Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required

Kurt Roeckx wrote: On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 07:47:17PM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: The immediate suspect is binutils, particularily ld. It might be interesting to do test compiles with an older binutils version (2.15 vs. 2.16?) and see if the problem is reproducible. The package in que

Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required

Thiemo Seufer wrote: Andreas Barth wrote: [snip] DEBIAN PACKAGE FROM REPOSITORY: 11 .rodata 000840cb 0021a180 0021a180 ... 21 .data 000233c0 003f1d60 003f1d60 ... MY OWN RECOMPILED DEBIAN PACKAGE: 11 .rodata 000a43ad 001f318

Re: Re: Debian shared libs use far more memory than required

Thiemo Seufer wrote: The whole thing sounds like the result of hiding _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ and _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ in newer binutils. I assume that you mean that the problem the problem is solved by using the latest binutils (and not that it was introduceed by them). Is there an ea