b: `./debian/hamm/binary-i386/oldlibs/lesstif-altdbg_0.82-1.deb'
is not a debian format archive
I have tried downloading them from a different mirror with the same
result. Are these packages really bogus, or am I just cursed? I don't
rely on these packages, but dselect compl
> ftp script)
Very bad idea. Some of us are behind a firewall that makes it
difficult to use standard ftp tools. Invoking ftp from an
installer script would only cause trouble. It should instead be done
like the nescape installer package where the software is downloaded
manually to
more partitions for Linux. Perhaps an tool like Partition Magic
could "shrink" your FAT partion, and you could thus get this setup
without touching NT.
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
re. The same problem applies to the site-lisp dirs in
/usr/lib. Maybe the Debian Policy should be extended to cover the
usage of these dirs.
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
The most important thing is that the shared directory issue is solved,
and this is best done by not compiling elisp files from packages
otherwise unrelated to emacsen.
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
st-inst scripts are
usefull for many purposes, but using them to execute a GNU emacs
and/or an XEmacs compilation on every package containing a single
elisp file is overkill.
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e functional even if
the .el's are uncompiled. (Maybe the program should also include an
option for cleaning .elc's if an emacsen is uninstalled?)
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
eloper stated this policy in one of the many
discussions in comp.os.linux.development.apps. Look for a thread with
the subject "Real reason why RedHat won't ship Qt" in DejaNews.
I think their main objective is that they want to include source code
for everything in the distribution
the packages "claim" to comply with (according to the maintainer).
Now you are at it, I suggest that you also scan the archive for packages
that fails to include a "Section" and/or "Priority" field. It is far
too many, and it is quite annoying.
- Sten Anderson
--
T
out as unclassified. This gives me the impression
of a low quality distribution (even Redhat can do this right).
- Sten Anderson
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
d with deity.
> >
>
>Not much experience yet, as the code is less than a day old and there
> are no HTTP accessible mirrors yet (prod prod).
There is a http mirror in Denmark at:
http://sunsite.auc.dk/ftp/pub/os/linux/debian/
(accessing this from Australia may require
11 matches
Mail list logo
