debian-user
next time (it's also off topic on debian-java).
--
Stefan Gybas
ckage to libgd1 (I personally don't think that this
was a good idea as it might cause problems during upgrades).
--
Stefan Gybas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[junit-freenet (#165504), orphaned 264 days ago]
When I look at the cvs, two classes have been commited 8 month ago, the
other 23 month ago!..
I will adopt this package but I won't upload a new version. I have asked
for its removal instead (#200949). Let's see which other us
Russell Coker wrote:
It sounds like we need a propolice enabled GCC.
I have talked to Matthias Klose, one of the GCC maintainers, about this.
He included the patch so he could built ProPolice-enables packages of
gcc and g++ but he's currently too busy with other things. He might
accept a patch t
endency on a virtual
machine (which is e.g. not needed for autobuilders). Could you first
file bug reports against all Java apckages that should provide
java1-runtime (like classpath)?
Regards,
Stefan Gybas
ntime*.
That's correct. I just changed this for tomcat4 yesterday: It now
depends on java-virtual-machine, java2-runtime, ... since I also thought
that javaX-runtime meant "core classes + JVM" in the past.
Regards,
Stefan Gybas
Hi!
I'm getting a lot of mails full of questions about my Linuxconf Debian
package so I've put together a little FAQ (attached).
I also want to further intergate Linuxconf into Debian but this requires
a lot of work. If you want to help me with this please contact me.
If you want to reply to thi
7 matches
Mail list logo
