mmendation/suggestion.
Dependencies that are actual dependencies and not recommendations or
suggestions, should not require this information for this same purpose but it
may be a good idea for different purposes that I'm not thinking about right
now.
Excellent week and fun at debconf!
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 22:57, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
> > I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
> > description,
>
> Why not? I think (briefly) explaining some of the most relevant
> recomme
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 18:34, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > * Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
> > > I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the pac
d version comes from: regular archive, security, volatile,
> external archive. Or, if there are no matches to show it as locally
> installed.
>
> If there are multiple potential sources some kind of ordering may be
> needed [1] as may handling of CD sets.
>
> Cheers,
> FJP
4 matches
Mail list logo
