Re: XFree86 4.0

I was wondering if we could pkg it alongside XF3.3.6 in potato (but then again, I wondered why we couldn't do this with the 2.2 kernel in slink). Federico Di Gregorio wrote: > > xfree86 4.0 released! we'll see it in woody? ciao, federico > > -- > Federico Di Gregorio > MIXAD LIVE System Program

Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

x27;t reccomend putting it on, but please /please/ PLEASE put potato out with a 2.4, or even pre-2.4 binary. -scott fenton

Re: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!

I have. In fact at one point I toyed with putting in a 2.3 kernel in. But I'm thinking of the people who don't want to compile a new kernel and listen to marketdroids for facts (eg. Debian is so out of date, it still has a 2.0 kernel). Jim Lynch wrote: > > If debian puts a 2.4 in, they will have

Re: realplayer installer and frozen

Calm down man. The men in the white coats will be here soon. Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 05:47:41PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > > The realplayer installer package in potato is broken and useless because > > Real has, in their infinite wisdom, removed version 6.x of the progr

X Packages?

, Scott Fenton

Re: X Packages?

Thanks. One more question (sorry!). Is there a way to do the equivilent of dpkg -L on an uninstalled package? Colin Watson wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (SCOTT FENTON) wrote: > >Greetings all. I am in the process of engeneering a tryout of XFree 4 > >and I need to know this

Re: YAPFSR: Yet Another Proposal For Speeding Releases.

The only problem would be if a package like util-linux or libc6 was auto-pulled because of this system. Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote: > > It's freeze time, and we are all discussing the same things, we would all > like to have a faster woody. I have a simple proposal for that: > > Let's keep the sy