, slow computers suck). I'm sure Herbert Xu knows
how to apply it. For those who don't:
apt-get source kernel-source-2.4.22
cd kernel-source-2.4.22-2.4.22
bzcat kernel-source-2.4.22+pax.diff.bz2 | patch -p1
Now that can't be too hard, can it?
Groetjes,
Peter Busser
--
The Adamanti
test to see for yourself.
So far I have heard a lot of talk and a number of opinions on why PaX is bad.
But no proof. I can reasonably proof any of the above. But I have seen no such
proof from those who propose exec-shield so far, only opinions and cheap talk.
Opinions are like assholes, everyone ha
Hi!
> [NB: When reponsding using the web archives, please get the References
> and In-Reply-To: correctly. You may also consider setting MFT:]
I can't post from the lists.debian.org site.
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2003, Peter Busser wrote:
> >> PaX would take much mor
ould be my hero if you succeeded in
improving on PaX. But in all honesty, exec-shield does not do that I'm afraid.
In fact, there is simply no technical reason whatsoever for exec-shield to
exist at all. None.
Groetjes,
Peter Busser
--
The Adamantix Project
Taking high-security Linux out o
. You so far gave the impression of a reasonable and balanced
> > person but this is as low as it gets. Shame on you.
Do you have the detailed specification of exec-shield somewhere? That would
make it easier to evaluate the completeness of the test suite. Feel free to
submit tests yourself, I&
time I checked we didn't have License fields, so this discussion is
pointless.
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://w
that the directories
holding libraries such as /lib can be safely maintained and kept from
growing out of hand.
Thanks to all open source developers for the work that has and continues
to be done.
Regards,
Peter :-}
e ago, or were never even in there in the first place.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm using debian unstable packages at the moment, and am trying to
compile my first... simple glade program. Using glade, I simply created
a window and then ran "write source code".
When I go to the projects directory and run ./autogen.sh I get the
following output, and can't get a make file
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sks
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : "Yaron M. Minsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/sks/
* License : GPL (parts are LGPL, BSD)
Description : Synchronizing OpenPGP Key Server
SKS is an
ml. -reas
Fabbione and I will use debian-sks. We will summarize and file a bug
against policy next week or so (being quite busy right now). Feel free
to beat us with submitting a problem description and summary :)
Peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian
uot;trusted Debian" name any more.
``They''? Who is ``they''? Does ``they'' include Debian developers who actively
contribute to Adamantix or not? You don't make any sense here Russell, let me
rephrase it again:
Peter can not use the "trusted Debian&quo
gt; > > Package is in good shape, no serious bugs. Very few work is needed
> > > > to maintain it as release cycle is quite long.
> > > >
> > > > The only one todo item is to package version 1.0, which requires
> > > > some changes to the wi
Package: wnpp
Version: 0.5
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: jamnntpd
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Johan Billing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.some.org/
* License : DFSG compliant
Description : NNTP server that allows newsreaders to access a J
er started to write a plan for putting Adamantix stuff in Debian. Then
we can discuss it and determine what needs to be done by whom. And then start
working on it.
Groetjes,
Peter Busser
Philipp Matthias Hahn wrote:
> What is consideres best practice when a package uses a SQL database
> (mysql, postgresql) and needs to create its own catalog and/or
> tables?
I say, create the tables when the package starts for the first time. As
an analogy, programs using Berkeley-type databases
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:32:19AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 05:52:39AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > > > Package: na
Marc Haber wrote:
> Do we have infrastructure to handle different answers for the same
> question? Maybe I'd like to have a different dbadmin password on my
> postgresql database than on mysql?
This discussion is about having a common set of chunks of text available
somewhere for use in the debco
martin f krafft wrote:
> What do you think of this proposal. Are there any string points
> *against* it?
I have written scripts that explicitly call xterm because other terminal
emulator programs under X (which I had preferred otherwise) couldn't
handle certain programs. So in those situations
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Is there any other reason why we would still need to use automake's
> dependency tracking anyway?
I don't think so. You may want to use it while working on the package,
but it seems like a fine idea to turn it off when finalizing the
package.
Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Perhaps we need a "read this before submitting bugs against my
> package" function in reportbugs :)
That already exists: /usr/share/bug/. "reportbug galeon" provides a
reasonable example run.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> Here's an idea I just had about apt-proxy/apt-cacher NG. Maybe this
> could be interesting, maybe it's just crap. Your call.
rapt proxy is an actuall http proxy that caches debian packages. It's
written in ruby and since all you have to do to use it
assphrase.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.
ory is issued in English, a message is
automatically sent out to the languages' announce lists, pointing to
where the original announcement can be found (either in the list
archives, or on the web), awaiting the translation.
--
\\//
Peter - I do not read or respond to mail with HTML
taller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 03:47:07 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rejected: no signature found in uucp_1.06.1+1.07beta1-patch2-2_powerpc.changes.
Rejected: no valid distribution.
Rejected: no source found f
lease.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palf
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am planning Debconf 3 to be held in Oslo, from Friday July 18th to
> Sunday July 20th.
Nice initiative.
--
Peter Makholm | I have something to say: It's better to burn in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
ad trouble?
I guess it is that line Matt was refering to.
--
Peter Makholm |I congratulate you. Happy goldfish bowl to you, to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | me, to everyone, and may each of you fry in hell
http://hacking.dk |
retitle them to RFP (request for package) rather than closing
them if you still think they'ld make a worthwhile addition to Debian.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. *
; respectively.
> #85612 mixmasterfiled: 560, changed 509
The changed date is clearly wrong. I suggest you redo your stats and
post an updated list.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and
ckage is listed in
it.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' O
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-htt
'ld like to work on and NMU. It's as simple as that. Your
suggestions sounds a bit like overengineering to me. Perhaps you can
setup an independant mailbot somewhere else? This need not necessarily
be directly in the BTS.
yours,
rks on satie.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/
their local language and use local keyboard layout, then we
indeed want's to have our software in english and us keyboard layout
with local as an switchable option, right?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 05:26:03PM +0200, Peter Mathiasson wrote:
> Because some admins, unlike the rest of us, thinks users want's to have
s/want's/wants
> software in their local language and use local keyboard layout, then we
> indeed want's to have our software in
ch I consider ontopic because the
packages are orphaned ATM).
If you only want to fix certain bugs without becoming their maintainer
that is apprechiated too. Just send a patch to the BTS. Perhaps you CC
debian-qa and ask for someone to apply, build and upload it.
oxy (and perhaps other tools
too).
Please don't.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/
would have been good, it wouldn't have made the
maintainer aware of the problem earlier (unless the NMU was delayed
until the maintainer had a time to fix it himself, of course).
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F
ol.
For you the NMU seems like a waste of time, but it was not a waste of
_your_ time, nor of the current maintainers (except for looking at a
diff which changed nothing but the build-depends field from what I can
tell, w/o looking at neither the package nor the NMU).
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mat
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:19:03PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> NMUer time is better spent on really unmaintained packages.
Amen.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpydQfe90SCO.
rectories belowe /var/cache/.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `.
er I think
> "debforge" has a better ring to it.
Please no.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : Th
ut the machine
> name.
I thought it was about the service name, the machine already got one.
Quoting Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The machine itself has a name already (quantz)."
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprin
the same time.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' : The universal
| `. `' Operating System
http://ww
wedish translation, where
Austria should sort *last*).
--
\\//
Peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
I do not read or respond to mail with HTML attachments.
houldn't be
> > shipping it in sarge if it's non-free.)
>
> Why not move it to non-free? Or you defining sarge as main only?
> We haven't voted to remove non-free yet.
I thought non-free wasn't part of Debian.
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, h
s.
> Thank you for your time, and you want to tell me I'm paranoid, don't
> bother, it is not worth your time :) Better tell me what I might have
> missed in the observing the subject.
I doesn't think any of the above counts as paranoia which obvious
doesn't mean that
ey can't handle running
unstable?
--
Peter Makholm | There are 10 kinds of people. Those who count in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |binary and those who don't
http://hacking.dk |
many messages).
> Pleased to meet you
>
> *plonk*
Nice entrance.
Let me predict the future. Within a month you have kill-filled anyone
in the project who matters more than just maintaining a few
packages. And most of us has has given up on you.
--
Peter Makholm |According
versions into the archive.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' :By professionals,
| `. `&
Mikael Hedin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone knows where the 1.3 source comes from? The content is totally
I think it originates from some ftp-server in .uk which had a lot of
different ispell dictionaries.
> different from the iswedish-1.x at sslug. Any advice on what to do?
Get the lat
phan can list packages from all section not just libraries (use -a).
Additionaly you can declare packages that deborphan should never show
(use editkeep).
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''
m, mosfet doesn't make sense to me - IIRC they only work like switches
I think you should use "Shotkey-diods" the largest one i know could pass
200 ampere - and they've less than ~0.4V voltage drop
:wq - until next mail B-), l8r
Peter
--
:~~ [EMAIL PR
MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian
> package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
> already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized?
Please read http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
Make
Wolfgang Sourdeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since ISO-8859-15 is basicall ISO-8859-1+euro+some other characters.
> Why is the "@euro" needed ?
A few often used chars has changed. So it is important to know which
cahrset is used. For example 1/2 and the french oe-ligature seems to
be on the sa
mho even more evil than cp.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' :By professionals,
| `. `' for professionals
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/
f 20+ Gig filesystems
took ages.
yours,
peter
--
PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
messages preferred.| : :' :By professionals,
| `. `' for professionals
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `-http://www.debian.org/
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 26, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Are there any problems I missed with cimply copying the files?
> Yes: people do not want to restart bind at every configuration changes.
good point.
> >Mount
Package: wnpp
Version: 0.96; reported 2001-09-27
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: links-lua-ssl
Version : 0.96p11
Upstream Author : links-lua team
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/links/
* License : GPL
Description : a fork of links supporting lua
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's not true. If it is possible to create game levels for it that are
> free, than it is considered free. It's not like you can't get anything
> but id's game data.
Are you sure?
I have sarien, a interpreter for old Sierra games, in contrib because
I
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's no reason why the engine itself can't be included in Debian, as
> far as I'm concerned. It doesn't absolutely *have* to have game data, to
But thats is an argument for putting all the stuff in contrib into
Debian main.
--
Når folk spørger mig
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Regarding packaging the Quake sources for educational benefit;
If the Quake sources could go into main without any free data then why
can't any other package in contrib go into main because the code could
potentially be educational. (Sarien for exanple
David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But with Quake2, you can be pretty damned sure that there will be at
> least dozens of people coming up with fully Free stuff that can be used
> as quake2-data.
When that day comes, then we could move quake2 to main.
--
Når folk spørger mig, om jeg e
Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At least the Source _is_ useful for novice programmers that are
> interested in 3d game programming.
How does Quake differ from any other projects in contrib in this way?
Contrib consists of free things where the source is available and
therefore can
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I wouldn't dream of trying to do such a thing without a game engine to
> test it on. How else to you test what you built? Why would you ever build
> a game without an engine to run it on?
How is preventing you from installing quake from contrib or in
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact, I would consider it acceptable in general to move everything in
> contrib to main as long as it each package was forced to be priority
All my messages in this thread have the premise that we want to keep a
distinction between contrib and mai
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The upstream code requires the administrator to introduce the user
> data (username, password, port, database, etc.) in the same Password.pm file,
> which looks horrible to me.
Ok, we've seen some solutions but the real problem remains: The perl
m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Bitkeeper is (as you note) not free. Not only the usage restrictions
> are a problem, but also the requirement that changes you make may be
> distributed by BitOwner "under any license".
Thats not non-free in any way. The Freedom DFSG describes
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please elaborate.
There is nothing in the DFSG saying the a licens can't require you to
give the original autor all rights to you changes. So that single
part of the license I refered to does not makes it even more or even
less non-free.
--
Når folk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> OK, perhaps the relicensing rule is not non-free; I'm less sure of
> that. But the outright prohibition of certain modifications certainly
> kills it.
I only talked about the relicensing issues. I'm sorry it wasn't clear
by my quoting (I can see
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 01:13:13PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>> OK, perhaps the relicensing rule is not non-free; I'm less sure of
>> that.
>
> I don't think it's obvious from a casual reading of the DFSG that such a
> requirement is non-free
Dominik Kubla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO that should be updated to nfs-utils-1.0 from upstream, if it
> only were for the psychological impact of the 1.x version number.
'psychological impact' isn't a valid argument for putting new versions
of software in stable.
--
Når folk spørger mig
://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
> >
> > But it exists here: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags
> > "help" is a tag, not a severity level.
>
> Well now I'm confused. I can now see help but in the severity section.
> So it is a
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, there *appears* to be one? You mean the one I sent this message to,
> and the one that I'm subscribed to? Right! Thanks for the information! I
> sent it to -devel because not all KDE users are subscribed to -devel.
And since when has users generally
original post said:
"and the EOF is ignored. The correction is to make the type of
variable c int."
I guess that's why it says "in OTHER contexts".
--
Peter Mathiasson | GPG Fingerprint:
E-Mail: peter(at)mathiasson(dot)nu | A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066
W
k down the individual
bugs. Char might be unsigned for a reason, like that it's faster to use
unsigned char on that arch, so the best solution is still to say signed char
where you mean it, use int with getchar, etc.
--
#define X(x,y) x##y
Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.c
t-cache`
apt: /usr/bin/apt-get
apt: /usr/bin/apt-cache
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpoSivUMfSFb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
7;t needed because not
many packages are updated in a day, and downloading a few extra package
descriptions is no problem.)
I think this all works :) The only hard part is finding the right offset
in a gzipped file given that you know how much of the begging of two
uncompressed files match.
--
ws XP, FreeBSD, etc on any of them.
Is it at all possible? Useable?
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgpyCBIaqXJdT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(plex86 development is a bit stalled at the moment). IMHO it's
> very usable, bochs is more stable but slower. For all supported
> systems read the documentation of the packages.
plex86 is Debian specific isn't it? Because, if it's not, I'm sure
plex86 got some mailing list
Peter S Galbraith:
> One of my packages disappeared from testing recently (not sure why)
Well, it was listed in the removal list that was posted on March 3rd:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2002/debian-devel-announce-200203/msg2.html
--
\\//
peter - h
atter of HOURS
(well, that didn't work for me, dunno why)."
--
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228
pgp3nT5ZfeSil.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes:
> IMO each package should at least once per release upload a status
> report. Also there was ample time for the transition of each package to
Disagreed. We should make package uploads just to make uploads.
If a package works, has no new upstream versions and
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And what makes you think there has been no new upstream versions for all
> those packages?
Nothing. I commented on you general opinion.
--
Emacs er det eneste moderne styresystem der ikke er multitrådet.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
x27;s proposal, he first raised
it at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/05/msg00970.html last
year.
Cheers,
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `'
hatsoever there's probably not a big
chance of us (as in DSA) hopping onto the openid hype any time soon.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `-http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
7;re willing to spend in order to get security.
For debtags I completely agree. But I was arguing against openid
because people were asking for ud-ldap/db.debian.org be turned into an
openid provider to be used for everything webish on debian.org,
including db.d.o.
--
| .&#x
anting console users access to
the netdev or powerdev groups through pam_groups, which is really really
annoying when you get your users from say ldap.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The univer
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm orphaning uucp, the unix to unix copy program.
I haven't had a UUCP setup it in a few years now, and I therefore
haven't had any chance to ensure stuff is continuing to work.
Apparently something in lenny broke in.uucpd (see #517726). I should
have noticed
g-multimedia would like/could take care of them? Or anybody else
> wants to adopt the pkg-xiph project? (I'm CC'ing Peter Samuelson, who
> expressed interest at some point.)
I am interested in these, but I will have to look at these packages
today or tomorrow, to see if I think I c
hardly be less secure than screen.
Well, if by "in /tmp" you mean "in /var/run/screen".
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
not
of sufficient help and no amount of proof by authority or handwaving
will change this.
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
BareFTP. It would be nice to have it
> packaged into Debian unstable.
>
> This application is available at:
> http://bareftp.org/
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www
I am trying to get ridge on the problem with lvm2. Therefore I have to
get some old packages from snapshot.debian.net. Unfortunately it seems
to be broken for some time now.
While the syntax you use doesn't seem to work anymore and /archive appears
empty it seems you can still browse directly t
ate Wikipedia article to link to, it would have
been a lot faster to just try it.
# ln /bin/ls /bin/ls2
# aptitude reinstall coreutils
# ls -l /bin/ls /bin/ls2
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debi
xine-dev libxml2-dev
--
| .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `-http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
presume dak will just ignore that binary, yes?
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
I think is probably the most sensible solution
I have seen so far.
> And yes, uploading a new source that builds a deb with the same
> version as the last source will cause DAK to reject the upload.
That's a problem, then.
--
Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/
--
901 - 1000 of 1910 matches
Mail list logo
