On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> "Erik Schanze (Debian)" wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>one of my packages (antiword) has an open bug in Ubuntu
>>https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/antiword/+bug/237918
>>that was fixed for a while in Debian
>>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
h enough headache :)
Can we get back to work now?
Thanks,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
You may indicate that your software works in
| conjunction with PHP by saying "Foo for PHP" instead of calling
| it "PHP Foo" or "phpfoo"
\
> Thomas
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C9
top of my head:
git/git, chromium/chromium, docker/docker, node/node
Those are all pretty big packages.
It'd be really annoying for a script to misuse a binary, which was
expecting node to be, well, node, or git to be git.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte |
rand (zigo)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
was discarded.
I didn't see this yet in the thread, so:
https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/libressls_prng_is_unsafe_on_linux
http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/07/only-a-few-days-old-openssl-fork-libressl-is-declared-unsafe-for-linux/
http://lwn.net/Articles/605509/
(Pick your news source)
Flame-
to ensure we're all Python 3 compatable,
but that's something distinct from changing /usr/bin/python to point at
/usr/bin/python3.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`
sible links
>1. https://gist.github.com/tmartinx/86adc8f33b12f163028b#file-nineteen-2-sh
>2.
> https://launchpad.net/~niko2040/+archive/ubuntu/e19?field.series_filter=trusty
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 0
mmon with
multiple versions of jQuery would reduce maintainer burden and avoid
filling the archive with tons of binaries if someone has a spare few hours.
For jessie+1 I guess.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7
evel. Until that changes, I think I'm with
plessy.
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Charles Plessy
> Debian Med packaging team,
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
> Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte | Proud Debian De
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:42 AM, olivier sallou
wrote:
>
> Le 27 mai 2012 03:12, "Jon Bernard" a écrit :
>
>
>>
>> * Charles Plessy wrote:
>> > Hello everybody,
>> >
>> > for one of the packages maintained by the pkg-eucalyptus team
>> > (euca2ools), the
>> > upstream source moved to GitHub, and
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Freitag, 1. Juni 2012, Steve Langasek wrote:
> [...]
>> This is very different from what some people mean when they use the word
>> hijack. In part, I think we have a terminological problem here; I don't
>> know if it's a matter of
SCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120722133128.ga6...@khazad-dum.debian.net
>
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian D
x27;s upstream, I'm guessing it'll get removed and sunk.
Let's kill off a namespace thing before we get there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:50:21AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On Tue Jul 24 2012 02:02:50 AM CST, Paul Tagliamonte
> wrote:
>
> > This seems an aweful lot like the nodejs / node situation.
>
> It's very different. Here the clash is at the
> package name le
-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/500e4080.40...@debian.org
>
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
from the
archive (see launchpad[1]).
It's deprecated upstream, and won't exist in Debian :)
Fondly,
Paul
[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/melange/+bug/1017609
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C
o, no, but it's present. Shouldn't take too much work to track this
down. This was something I was planning to do once the general feel was
that this was a good idea.
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> perl -E '$_=q;$/= @{[@_]};and s;\S+;;eg;say~~reverse'
Cheers,
Paul
--
27;m guessing) wouldn't be
receptive to such changes, and I don't think it's right to try to
enforce this on them.
I'm open to your opinions on this :)
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> Ben Hutchings
> It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:43:24PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> >> If a package fails to build with an alternate compiler (that is, it
> >> correctly *uses* the compiler, but the compiler reports a fatal
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:27:18PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> 2012/8/28 Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> >> Just curious, do you have a list of such packages?
> >
> > No, I've not built up such a list. I've seen it enough for me to recall
> > this edge-case. Most
gt; --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/caktje6etghodm7ye-scuv_vs1bgx165eipqqbulff8psjzm...@mail.gmail.com
>
Cheers,
Pau
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the
> prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and
> explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me.
>
> That's why I'm goi
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
fty to see what breaks with all sorts of UTF jamed down it's stdin.
That being said, I don't know anything about this.
>
> --
>
>
> Neil Williams
> =
> http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
>
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
show they've made
good decisions when uploading in the past, why not. It's easy to revoke
the commit bit.
My two cents :)
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
es -- I mean, we're using this tool to push stuff, it
seems sane to keep it all in one place, anyway.
Once the format is nailed down, I'll add this to dput-ng.
Right.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
m.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dputng.git
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 01:16:29AM +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I have signed Canonical's and Python Software Foundation's contributor
> agreements.
> But I have no intention to assign copyright to FSF at the moment,
> given it's past well documented bad practices at doing things for the
> sake
ing source data.
While treating .png files as prefered forms of modification is insane,
there are cases where crushing this will render them even worse.
I've been debating writing dh_pngcrush / dh_jpegoptim. I think it's a
good idea. Just don't expect graphic designers to want the
> The severity would be minor.
> Of course, I would do that only when the issue is upstream [2].
>
> Any comments ?
I am, of course, biased. I do, however think this would be a good move
for Debian on the whole, and will help with such an effort.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. P
errors are more strict readings of the spec, and relying on
gcc's quirks isn't a great idea.
If code can be fixed, it'd a good idea, since gcc may (and has, in the
past), changed non-standard behavior to be more correct.
minor severity sounds good to me :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.'
vices.
Let's see how the GSoC project turns out; I'm willing to bet even a
proof of concept would be useful to services that interdepend so
closely.
I mean, not to play the "UNIX" card, but one thing well, you know? Let's
just aid in the code talking to each other bette
hen it ran, it segfaulted, which is a bug,
yes.
However, it's not security, and to see the bug tagged 'security' was
troubling - what oversight do you have to prevent the security team to
get flooded with such bug reports (this bug is not a security risk.)
Thanks!
Paul
--
.'&
that `dcut(1)` uses to rm / cancel uploads), so, it's only
natural that it's usable with dcut :)
Currently, only dput-ng supports this, you can invoke `dcut` from
dput-ng in-place from the git repo.
Some examples from the man page:
$ dcut dm --uid "Paul Tagliamonte" --allow g
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:31:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>
> > Some examples from the man page:
> >
> > $ dcut dm --uid "Paul Tagliamonte" --allow glibc
> >$ dcut dm --uid 0x0DEFACED --all
A in this post-control world.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Again, why do you plan on removing free software from main due to a
change in license?
Cheers,
Paul
[1]:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GfEnd4xeEJs/UOxBvCCdgGI/BSU/PgL41SlEQ98/s1600/huh-what.gif
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 409
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 09:15:15AM -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Again, why do you plan on removing free software from main due to a
> change in license?
As algernon points out, it makes slightly more sense when you remember
that the AGPLv3 is not compatable with the GPLv2
I'm st
iction - if you're using my
Sure, but that doesn't make it DFSG free (hint: it's likely not)[1][2]
[1]: The Dissident test
[2]: The Desert Island test
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A
Perhaps you'd be interested in 20130105150458.ga6...@vasudev.homelinux.net
Cheers,
Paul
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Richard Hartmann
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> during my ongoing NM process, I have been asked to review several
> Debian documents and propose any changes I would like to see.
>
>
ility might have tricked folks who aren't carefully
reading into thinking it's not free.
Either way, there's a more general point about DFSG 10, which has been
brought up a few times (usually by folks who assume the DFSG is the letter
of the law, whereas they're actually guidel
hrow away
someone willing to do great work within Debian?
> but just because a GSoC student is working on OpenRC in Debian
> doesn't make it any more appealing or sensible in my eyes.
It gives us an option.
[...]
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :'
(On my phone, I hate this ui, sorry for the CC Russ)
On Jul 19, 2013 5:30 PM, "Russ Allbery" wrote:
>
> David Kalnischkies writes:
>
> > Of course, both analysis are obviously flawed as this popcon data can't
> > really be interpreted that way as its an apple to banana comparison and
> > way too
ose with breaking "NMUs" (PPA
Owner Uploads? POU?) of packages to help with integration, but I fear
there might be project backlash over that.
So, what do *you* think? How can we break more of Debian for fun and
profit?
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :&#x
n a little corner,
there's a good chance that this helps come up with a *real* transition
plan that prevents breakage on real machines.
Either way, semantics, IMHO,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gt; DDs by putting in a reasonable amount of effort to think about safer
> solutions.
I do agree, but I also think that allowing DDs to break things in a
small, contained section (e.g. PPAMAIN), we can help avoid bigger
breakage by testing out the plan in the real world, with real-world
conditi
to process NEW anymore).
This must mean many people who care deeply about this topic see this as an
issue.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.d
erials to discuss R's binary files ?
I would be happy to document what is and isn't OK with these files. I'll
have to seek a bit of consensus from the rest of the ftp-team, but I
think treating them as if they were any other data format should be
fine.
>
> Ian.
Thank
e time it takes to compile something and be able
> to test it is one way to increase your productivity. This is true
> whether you're compiling a simple C program or a complete distribution CD.
>
> --
> see shy jo
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :&
t
this will be the usual behavior.
I could see a *huge* load on this pool for this reason.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
BSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5224c106.50...@debian.org
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
IBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5225d6a7.3000...@free.fr
>
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that it is very
> important to have at least a clear separation between the blocking issues and
> the personal comments. In the case of pv-grub-menu, I am left with the
> questions "What else shall I do that I have not tried yet ? How many weeks or
> monthes shall I try before g
the upload.
However, doing this is frowned upon without the coordination of the
current maintainer - so that's a pretty needed first step!
Thank you so much for your work! Let's get your changes in the archive!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Dev
modification in the source.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 05:04:50PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> On 20/09/13 15:49, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:47:39PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> >>> It is also impossi
feel the need to use such a irrational tone?
Please don't upload stuff we wouldn't accept into the archive onto
debian machines. If it's not fit for the archive, I don't understand why
you think it's OK to distribute this on Debian machines.
C'mon. Really.
ile's for. They're not competing.
I would never use debile to build nightly debs, for instance. I'd just
jenkins. At best, I'd use jenkins and dput to a debile build setup.
>
> Best,
> Michael
Thanks for your interest, mt!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
change.org asking him to free the world from this evil license[2].
He just makes fun of such efforts. All the damn time. It's not worth
feeding the troll.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 09:32:15PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:
> On Monday, October 07, 2013 08:06:47 PM Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > > I met another piece of Software (JSHint [sic!])
> >
> > They did a rewrite that is no longer subject to his terms.
>
> I'
de this asbestos suit,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mode
> disappears.
What's the status of GNOME on BSDs? How do they get around this sytemd
stuff, if it's not ported? Do they just use chunks of systemd like
Ubuntu?
I know GNOME is fairly sane, I can't imagine they'd break *BSD like
that.
Cheers,
T
--
.''
erwise a major package is using another major package in an
unsupported configuration (or at least in a way that the maintainer
doesn't wish to support)
Since the project (on the whole) is fairly divided, I don't think we
should trivialize this to "actively developed" vs "cru
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:03:38PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer scientia.net> writes:
> Let’s GR it.
Let's tech committee it :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 02:27:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Paul Tagliamonte debian.org> writes:
>
> > > Let’s GR it.
> >
> > Let's tech committee it :)
>
> I’d ask them to solve the situation of gnome/xfce depending on systemd,
> or someth
o this
will result in lots of fragmentation, since the process in which a
daemon is brought up will depend on what DE you have installed (???)
> should go away since it’s also Poetteringware and thus not better),
This is FUD and ad hominem.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamon
don't trust the Debian tech committee to make good judgement
calls for Debian, we've got bigger problems.
This is seriously disturbing to read.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 03:02:55PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Paul Tagliamonte debian.org> writes:
>
> >Decide any technical matter where Developers' jurisdictions overlap.
>
> This is more or less a political question (and one of trust and one to
>
In addition, I find that developers care quite a bit (in both
directions), and dependencies / conflicts are only going to become more
common and serious for our users.
Thank you!
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:40:15PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
>
> >please vote on and decide on the default init system for Debian.
>
> It’s not (just) about the _default_ but also on whether we will
> force this default init system onto *all*
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 04:53:52PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Paul Tagliamonte dixit:
>
> >It may be, but it's not for the project. Let's let this bug be, and
> >have the tech cttie decide on *the* init system for Debian. If you want
>
> No, this must reall
l-formed and discussed
points, rather then the nonsense we have in these threads.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
round* the lack
of systemd, or patching software to use systemd)
I believe this is within the ctte's jurisdiction, given 6.1 section 2.
Thanks for your consideration,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:40:48PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
Yo, Holger!
> On Freitag, 25. Oktober 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Supporting two different init systems is something I don't think
> > *anyone* wants to get into.
>
> are you sure *so* man
st super tired of this thread. It keeps coming up time
after time after time after time.
I don't care if they decide something that I don't agree with -- at all --
I'd just prefer that we had *a* decision, backed with facts, that has a
Debian-ish argument behind it.
Much love,
Can this be taken off-list? I don't care either way, I'd still take his
points even if he wasn't.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 10/26/2013 09:17 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:02:00AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> >>> I'm fed up with repeat
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 07:01:05PM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Could this problem be explained. As long as they are in separate
> directories and called explicitly does that matter?
Please see the nodejs vs node thread(s).
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :&
a lack of respect to your peers on this list.
Change your tone.
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it tiresome to include it when you have done it
> before.
Perhaps a sign you've said all you need to.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
his is a Mozilla mark
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/licensing/ even says:
Our trademarks include, among others, the names Mozilla®, mozilla.org®,
Firefox®, Thunderbird®, Bugzilla™, Camino®, Sunbird®, SeaMonkey®, and
XUL™ [..]
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :'
progress is not possible"
-- Frank Zappa
I believe this is a purely technical issue, and one that is near 100%
invisible to the user. Let us not delay the decision or implementation.
I'm left with more questions than answers after reading this mail :)
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 03:14:14PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[snip]
Some good points made all around, more for the ctte to consider. As
Jonathan says, it's in ctte's hands now, let's agree to disagree and let
the poor souls on the commitee do their job
Cheers,
Paul
-
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 06:53:40PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
[...]
Again, good points, but ones we've discussed. Perhaps we should end this
thread?
Fondly,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte
* Package name: python-github2
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Ask Solem
* URL : http://packages.python.org/github2/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Library to expose
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte
* Package name: python-icalendar
Version : 2.2
Upstream Author : Rok Garbas
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/icalendar
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : parser/generator
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:45:58PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Marco Nenciarini writes:
>
> > Il giorno gio, 11/10/2012 alle 02.46 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer ha
> > scritto:
> >>
> >> On the other hand, some worries are there that this could imply some
> >> decline in Debian itself.
> >
.debian.org/bzr/
>
> Adrian
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive:
> http://lists.debian.org/bc4bd80d-1d13-4c4f-bf61-060e5d651...@physik
>
> Christoph
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871ugxgddd@mitoraj.siccegge.de
>
--
.'&#
on.
> > > Can I have my own LP, please?
> > https://dev.launchpad.net/Running should help you with that.
>
> With the danger of being sued if you put up the result onto the public
> interwebs.
Could you please expand on that? Logo / trademark reasons or license
issue
.
It maintains the same interface and is backwards compatible. The change
between dput and dupload was big enough where they were totally
different ways of solving the problem.
We support old arguments, and will make it a point to make sure old
setups are still compatable.
Cheers,
Paul
--
XS-Testsuite: autopkgtest
>
> It seems that #PACKAGE# lacks such a header.
> Can you please add it?
>
> Thanks for considering,
> Cheers.
>
>
> [1]: http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/autopkgtest.html
> [2]:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/au
her try? DPL, you're pretty
> eloquent and your voice may carry some extra weight? ;)
>
>
> Cheers
>
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2010/03/msg00064.html
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses
>
Cheers,
Paul
--
.'&#
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Neil McGovern , 2012-11-16, 15:46:
>
> These bugs aren't gonna get fixed in time - tagging ignore appropriately.
>>
>
> Excellent. Now Mr Crockford can say that his license is good enough for
> Debian.
I don't think our dear friend Mr. C
ugh to guess that CC and list email is
> > the same and will not duplicate it
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1353
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Tagliamonte
* Package name: gcc-python-plugin
Version : 0.11
Upstream Author : "David Malcolm"
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/gcc-python-plugin/
* License : GPLv3 (or later)
Programming Lang:
an.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html
[5] http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/dputng.git
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pport for stable in a branch, given we're
likely releasing soonish anyway. If there's an overwhelming demand, I'll
see about trying to fix master / unstable for a straight backport.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Michael
>
Advice on this is super welcome, I'm not up to date on m
heezy.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Michael
>
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
