+1 :)
On Jul 1, 2014 6:39 PM, "Norbert Preining" wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > I don't think so. I think it encourages to be more easy going, and have
> > fun, but never mind. Let's keep Debian boring^W^Wportland weird. :)
>
> +1
>
> Fun is missing, humour even more.
>
>
Unless its renamed AFAICT.
T
On Jul 7, 2014 4:19 AM, "The Wanderer" wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 07/07/2014 03:39 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> > On 07/01/2014 05:22 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >
> >> Unless I'm mistaken, the wording in the PHP license makes i
On my phone, excuse the Cc and (I'm guessing HTML mail)
Hi, Charles.
On Sep 1, 2013 10:59 PM, "Charles Plessy" wrote:
>
> Answering on a broader audience because I think that there is really a
drift
> from ensuring archive integrity to massive and arbitrary top-down
nitpicking.
>
> Le Mon, Sep 0
(On my phone)
The real question is it less *distributable*? If its GPL and contains
things *not* in preferred form, I'd say yes, that would be less
distributable, since its a GPL violation and results in breech of license -
which means we can't distribute.
My 2 cents (as a DD),
Paul
On Sep 21,
This has now been discussed ad nauseam. Can we please stop posting about
this on -devel and let the tech-ctte work?
Thanks,
Paul
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:30 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 11/08/2013 02:54 PM, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> > Additional
On Mar 6, 2013 8:09 AM, "Holger Levsen" wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 6. März 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Fwiw since it is backwards compatible, dput-ng works fine from git
in-place
>
> your point being?
If you don't want to, you don't have to purge the old dput, as you seemed
concerned about usi
Just as unstable has "sid", experimental is "rc-buggy", the rc car from toy
story.
Hilarious joke :)
T
On Mar 28, 2013 6:36 AM, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 11:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
>> rc-buggy is not a codename, it's a bad joke. D
Out of curiosity, how do you plan on solving it's six rc bugs?
On Nov 15, 2013 9:10 AM, "Mark Brown" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:02:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > * Package name: xemacs21
> > > Version
I've got some I drew up, I'll add them shortlyish
On Jan 30, 2014 1:10 AM, "Paul Wise" wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Sebastian Baltes wrote:
>
> > Any ideas where I can find sketches and diagrams that are related to the
> > development of Debian?
>
> I just created a page of links to
Sure. I'll show up. I've implemented oauth2 for stuff at work, and I
know a bit about consuming it.
If we had an oauth2 project in Python (3), I'd love to add support for
U2F keys too!
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:11:16AM
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 2:29 PM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> The reasons why the FTP masters might reject a package from the archive
> are public [0]. Nowhere on the list is there an entry that says
> "somebody doesn't like this package" or "it has stuff that might offend
> someone" as a valid rea
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 5:12 PM Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote:
> If you have a master key on your laptop, when a yubikey is in, while
> running gpg --edit-key your_main_key, you can use the "addcardkey" to
> create a subkey on the Yubikey directly.
>
Yeah, seconded for sure. This is the configuratio
There's also a very through exploration at https://github.com/amlweems/xzbot
Including, very interestingly, a discussion of format(s) of the
payload(s), and a mechanism to replace the backdoor key to play with
executing commands against a popped sshd, as well as some code to go
along with it.
p
I seemed to remember we retain actual outside council last i knew. Is that
still the case?
This request ought to come from the ftp team if we do do this, fwiw
Paul
On Tue, Feb 1, 2022, 4:12 AM Stephan Lachnit
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:47 AM Jonathan Carter wrote:
> >
> > As for get
IIRC it will, it stores seen signature hashes
On Oct 29, 2016 7:29 PM, "Ian Jackson"
wrote:
> Julien Cristau writes ("Re: Autogenerated -dbgsym packages made my package
> by REJECTed"):
> > Right, fasolo had jessie's lintian. Upgraded to jessie-backports now,
> > sorry for the inconvenience.
>
FWIW, I don't think any of the dput-ng hackers particularly mind if it
changes, changing API could just happen for both together, at the same
time. Or maybe just consolidate :)
Paul
On Dec 28, 2016 4:34 PM, "Ian Jackson"
wrote:
> Ben Finney writes ("dput: Call for feedback: What should change?
Conversely, if the patches are invasive and unmaintainable, its not on
Debian to merge them.
On Jan 3, 2018 9:09 AM, "Wouter Verhelst" wrote:
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:59:05PM +0100, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3 January 2018 at 13:12, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Package:
I had a similar bug on my machine that was due to a missing
systemd-timesyncd user. I didn't report it because I assumed it was user
error
Paul
On Jan 13, 2018 11:57 AM, "Simon McVittie" wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 13:50:00 +0100, André Verwijs wrote:
> > Debian 9: FAILED to start Netwo
Hey DPMT (BCC'ing -devel, let's keep conversaion on DPMT),
I see that Python 3.7 now raises a syntax error when you try to import
a module that is named `async`.
```
$ python3.6
Python 3.6.6 (default, Jun 27 2018, 14:44:17)
[GCC 8.1.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for
That's correct.
This is no different than saying the Python importable name is the package
name. And why we see stuff like:
python-foo.bar, since you import foo.bar.
You import that URL. The package name is just the import name. No different
than Python.
Cheers,
Paul
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/05/10/5 <-- link to
that discussion!
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:55 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Daniel Stender writes:
>
>> Distributed source control management/revision control system. Known as
>> being used for the Linux kernel development before Gi
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:14 PM Santiago Ruano Rincón
wrote:
> There are two numbers accompanying the source packages: the amount of
> currently open security issues in sid, and the number of security issues
> that have been present in Debian ever (as you mention).
>
I've been biting my tongue a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, 8:56 AM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> I agree that something like this effort is likely to reduce the
> occurence of that sort of thing. And, yes, CVE is probably not a great
> proxy. But Santiago has discussed this with quite a few of us on the LTS
> team at various points al
23 matches
Mail list logo
