Re: status of bzip

On Fri 12 Dec 1997, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Thu 11 Dec 1997, Guy Maor wrote: > > Andy Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > It is different becuase the lzw patent holders (HP?) have given a > > > general license for non-profit use of the patent. > > >

Re: ["Gonzalo A. Diethelm" ] Re: Moving topics from debian-private (was Re: SPI money out)

goes > >> into the "To:" header and list address (along with all other > >> thread participant's adresses) to "Cc:" header. > > James> So, umm, fix elm? > > Or use `Gnus'. :-) Or 'mutt'. That may be more fami

What happened to perl's strict.pm?

eferences it... Another thing: I first had perl_5.004.02-1 installed. Replacing this with perl-base_5.004.04-3 and perl_5.004.04-3 left me with a /usr/bin/perl which was still the old version, and a /usr/bin/perl5.00404 which is the new one. Why do I still have the old binary? Paul Slootman

Re: What happened to perl's strict.pm?

On Mon 29 Dec 1997, Paul Slootman wrote: > Investigation shows that strict.pm used to be part of the `perl' > package, but now has disappeared. However, Getopt/Long.pm still > references it... Amazing. I restored the 'bo' system, and restarted the upgrade process. Now tha

Re: Re[2]: cron jobs more often than daily

etc/cron.tab. Why not require packages that need this level of control over cron jobs to register a user, so that a user-specific crontab (in /var/spool/cron/crontabs) can be installed, e.g. with "crontab -u package file" ? Paul Slootman -- Can you get your operating system fixed w

Re: Re[2]: cron jobs more often than daily

On Tue 06 Jan 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Tue, Jan 06, 1998 at 10:57:48AM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote: > > Why not require packages that need this level of control over cron jobs > > to register a user, so that a user-specific crontab (in > > /var/spool/cron/crontabs)

Anyone working on new rxvt version?

rxvt 2.4.5 was announced on New Year's Day. As the current hamm package of rxvt is still 2.20, it would be great if the new version is available. There have been many improvements; I notice the difference immediately when I happen to use 2.20 instead of the 2.4.x versions. Paul Slootman --

Re: Is there a maintainer for the install doc?

... Things like the libc5-libc6 howto and the script that's being developed now should end up in there. Paul Slootman -- Can you get your operating system fixed when you need it? Linux - the supportable operating system. http://www.debian.org/support.html home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL

Re: base-files 1.6 (source all) uploaded to master

m all commented out. That way, when someone doesn't want the default, it's fairly trivial to change to something else. Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands Support Randal Schwartz! See

Re: does not support iso9660

might get a warning. Please, in the future, use debian-user for this type of question which doesn't have anything to do with the development of debian. Thanks. Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Ne

Re: Are we shipping 2.0 with ipmasq in the default kernel?

However, ipmasq simply does _not_ work when using (a) dialup access and (b) dynamic IP addresses. This was not clear when installing the package. In fact, it took me quite some digging to find out that bogus rules created by ipmasq were responsible. I ended up ripping it out and manually putt

Re: vim, help files and vimrc

27;ve already fixed some stuff, so it might be best if you simply upload your fixed version. After that, if the current maintainer doesn't object, I would be willing to take over. BTW: bug 16138 is no longer an issue with Vim 5.0, and should be closed (I've already followed up on the BTS)

Re: Anyone want to make a Debian XDM login screen?

, set the background black, and run xlock with a pretty anim in the background. You have to kill it when folks log in. Here's da code (apologies for volume): -- Paul Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Design Lead Partner Software, Inc.http:

Re: why not mingetty??

lines if you don't want terminal-type dependencies... Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands Support Randal Schwartz! See http://www.lightlink.com/fors/ or send empty email to [EMAIL PROT

Re: rescue1440.bin

cp /dev/fd0 rescue1440.bin' might also do it. Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands Support Randal Schwartz! See http://www.lightlink.com/fors/ or send empty email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UN

Re: why not mingetty??

, now I think about it; thanks for putting it more clearly :-) Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands Support Randal Schwartz! See http://www.lightlink.com/fors/ or send empty email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?

working on them, but unfortunately it's true; I myself am also to blame, I could have written up some docs myself in the meantime). So, I'm still undecided as to whether 2.0 should go out for Alpha. Anyone else have opinions? Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Lilo..

ies. I did that by hand "dd if=/boot/mbr.b of=/dev/sda bs=444" and after that I could boot from the disk. And yes, I did answer 'y' to the question "install a boot block" or whatever the exact message is. Note that this only happens on a virgin disk or a disk that ot

Re: installation report of hamm 26.4.

can get fixed (by the upstream maintainer, I'd assume). I still have the crashed disk, so I could test this if necessary (I copied the readable data to another disk before fsck'ing; amazing how much data you can recover when one of the 15 heads is dead). Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL P

Re: More on icons for packages

On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 19:35 -0500, Dale C. Scheetz wrote: > With regards to GNOME panel icons. The "add to panel" option now no > longer offers "launcher from menu" so now with the "custom launcer" > you have to hunt for your icon. well yes, here it does at least. also you can drag and drop it f

Re: More on icons for packages

On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 09:41 -0500, Dale Scheetz wrote: > The icon I would prefer to use on the desktop/panel is 114x154 pixels > and gives a smoother lookeing icon. I'll have to experiment with violating > the menu spec and seeing how it works... i would say that could sound too large for an ic

Re: Hamm for other architectures

issing packages aren't in the "essential" or "required" group, so not really that much of a problem. Work still needs to be done on the installation procedure, but that's the same everywhere, I guess. Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ht

Re: Move -dev files to libs?

sily. That last part sounds good. Go for it. Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl | Murphy Software, Enschede, the Netherlands -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)?

rocessed c code to be compiled into object code. So the source-code building widget is compiled remotely, run locally, and the results are sent to compile remotely. -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies

Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental?

inning) is: Set a target release, or it won't do what you expect. ^_^ Or at the very least, (if for example you use other archives that also claim to be unstable, and you only want to fall back on them if Debian/unstable doesn't have what you need:) Package: * Pin: release o=Debian,a=Unsta

Re: status of buildds?

I can happily provide two Sun SS20's , one or two U1's and an Acorn RiscPC to help build ARM and Sparc. I'd happily give them a basic install, provide broadband access to them and hand over control to the buildd team. -- Paul On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:43:40PM -0800, Thomas Bus

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

roblem with the package, it doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool (mbox in /var/mail) is read-only. (vanilla) Mutt can use it fine. -- --- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, MCSE 8th year CompSci/Asian Studies

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:39:04AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it > > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool > > (

Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo

s nothing to do with freedom. -- Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:33:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > What we have is source code (yes code that can be compiled) which is > > unencumbered, we can modify,compile, distribute etc... whether it is > > _ha

Bug#303307: ITP: freecycle -- a beat slicer

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: freecycle Version : 0.1alpha411 Upstream Author : Predrag Viceic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.nongnu.org/freecycle/ * License : GPLv2 Description

Bug#306290: ITP: ttf-mph-2b-damase -- font with ranges from the latest version of unicode

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: ttf-mph-2b-damase Version : 001.000 Upstream Author : Mark Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://fixedsys.org/~node_ue/fonts/ * License : Public Domain

Re: packages missing from sarge

Joey Hess wrote: [snip] > doctorj Seem to just be a SPARC buildd issue holding this out of sarge, as reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] previously. Can someone with access to a SPARC do a binary-NMU to get this into sarge, please? [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2005/04

distributed batch processing

something obvious. Is there a tool out there that i could use as a drop in replacement for queue? cheers, paul [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/queue/ [1] http://packages.debian.org/stable/admin/dqs [2] http://www.openpbs.org/ [3] http://distribulator.sourceforge.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#308433: ITP: helpdeco -- decompile Microsoft WinHelp files

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: helpdeco Version : 2.1.1 Upstream Author : Manfred Winterhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://sf.net/projects/helpdeco/ * License : GPL Description

Re: distributed batch processing

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:57:45AM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote: > > On 10 May 2005, at 1:05 am, Paul Brossier wrote: > >Now i feel like i have missed something obvious. Is there a tool > >out there that i could use as a drop in replacement for queue? > > This is not the right

Re: [WASTE-dev-public] Do not package WASTE! UNAUTHORIZED SOFTWARE [Was: Re: Questions about waste licence and code.]

This topic has been beat to death and is the cause for most of the devs bailing throughout the life of the project (legal concerns). There are a couple old articles on /. that should cover all the arguments (in the comments)...but I'm sure you'll find them all over. here's one: http://slashdot.o

Re: Upcoming removal of orphaned packages

ave released the NSS filesystem for Linux with SLES9, so an alternative "inspired by" NSS isn't really necessary now... -- Paul <http://paulgear.webhop.net> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Testing package installation, upgrading, and removal

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:15:08AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld and others have brought up the idea of automatically > testing installation, upgrading, and removal of packages. It struck me > that it should be pretty simple to implement at least basic versions of > this. The res

Re: Orphaning packages

On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 11:08:28PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote: > Hi, > > I'm orphaning these packages: > > alsaplayer (bug #314841) i will be interested in maintaining this one. i will propose comaintainance on the bts entry. cheers, piem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Bug#382796: ITP: python-alsaaudio -- Alsa bindings for Python

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-alsaaudio Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Casper Wilstrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.example.org/ * License : Python Software Founda

Re: Bug#382796: ITP: python-alsaaudio -- Alsa bindings for Python

On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 03:02:22PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.13.1418 +0100]: > > * Package name: python-alsaaudio > > Sweet. An ITP for a package already in unstable... moo :P at that time, the package was n

Bug#384693: Debian traduction team should work on Xt applications localization too

On Sat, 2006-08-26 at 10:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Why did you reassign this bug to xterm? I made a mistake, for which I apologise. > The real purpose of the bug is not to provide the xterm fr > translations, but to have the debian i18n team start the process of > translating all Xt app

[VAC] 3 months sailing through SE Asia

Hi all, [sent to debian-devel since I'm not yet a DD] I'll be away from the Internet for 3 months. I'll be on a research vessel[1,2] sailing from Cairns, Australia. We will be stopping in Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and I'll be getting off in Phuket, Thailand (or maybe Singapore) in December.

Re: Next Debian Release

On Tuesday 29 August 2006 11:02, Allen wrote: > To whom it may concern, I was wondering if you have schedule or roadmap for > the next available release version of Debian. Google finds it easily. http://www.debian.org/releases/ -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Tal

Re: Bug#385338: wish: dpkg-reconfigure localepurge to select when to run localepurge automatically

CC'ed debian-devel On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 04:49:11PM +0100, João Batista wrote: > > I'd like to propose a facility, configurable when running > dpkg-reconfigure localepurge , to allow the sysadmin to select when > localepurge should be run e.g.: > - everytime dpkg/apt is run (default) > - m

Re: Why not only support Sid and Testing?

products. You can already start to see the change being made: Windows Live OneCare is replacing Windows on WalMart shelves, for example. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpspzLoE8zsi.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Why not only support Sid and Testing?

at about 85%, and servers around 10%. My web stats put Windows at around 70%, presumably desktops. If the 95% figure was ever true, those days are ancient history now. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpaB0fVwKmo4.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Bug#390195: ethiop: Please package Type1 versions of the fonts

Frank Küster wrote: > We'd be glad to hear from you whether you want to continue maintaining > ethiop, and whether you plan to include the fonts in this or a separate > package, so that we can adjust our dependencies. In case you'd rather > give up the package (which we'd really regret), please al

aclocal patches

hi all, just wondering: is there a reason why those simple aclocal-1.8 patches haven't been applied yet? it would be nice to make autoreconf a little happier. i am not aware of any backward compatibility issue, so i can't see how this could hurt, but maybe i missed something. cc-ing to the corr

Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386)

Ove Kaaven wrote: ... > Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:39:30 -0500 > Source: wine ... > Version: 0.9.21-1 > Distribution: unstable ... > Changes: > wine (0.9.21-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* New upstream release 0.9.21. > Well, thank you! But... This version is already rather ancient according

Re: Accepted wine 0.9.21-1 (source i386)

Ove Kaaven wrote: > It's not news to me. You read what I wrote in the changelog, right? > >* This version was released Sep 13, 2006. > Packaged kind of late I guess, I've had disk space issues and stuff. > Yes, and this again made me wonder even more, culminating in my former message. Ac

Bug#398890: O: ethiop

Package: wnpp Severity: normal Unfortunately, i have no use anymore for this package and therefore won't keep maintaining it. A new maintainer is needed, preferably with an Ethiopian language background, if at all possible. Maybe it would even be better to completely remove the package from the D

Re: Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (4.0/etch)?

> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > But Hendrik Sattler is perfectly right and this knowledge has to be stored > at prominant places like: > > a) installation manual > b) apt-key.8 > c) perhaps somewhere else Should the apt-get warning message be changed to refer to apt-key.8?

Re: Elive requires donation to download

> Elive , based on Debian, > requires a donation, however small, to allow downloading. I wonder if > this legally sound. > > Ottavio >From the page you referred to above: "If you don't care about the future of Elive, and you really think its possibl

Re: exim configuration in master, and per-user DNSBLs

. I'd add them to the top, as I wouldn't even want postmaster mail from such systems. Paul Slootman -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dynamic linking to /usr/lib/xxxxx directory.

cerned, so can I ask a fairly basic question? How do I link the program so that the end-user does not have to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH? Is this a job for the "--rpath" ld parameter, or is there a better way? For information, the upstream Makefiles do _not_ use libtool. Thanks, Paul -- T

[ITH] eagle-usb

Debian-Devel, I intend to hijack the eagle-usb source package. The last maintainer upload was 2005-04-14 and the package has subsequently been removed from testing/etch and NMUd to fix FTBFS bugs. Other bugs have gone uncommented on even with patches in the BTS, upstream and with new upstream rel

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

people sending out these emails shouldn't be doing this, or that developers shouldn't be using @debian.org addresses for that purpose, but it's not quite as clear cut as not being able to reply means that you don't want to receive an email. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

someone can biologically change from one sex to another). Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: etch's upgrades during life cycle

release cycle does seem to be speeding up a bit, which is definitely a good thing. Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Best scheme for teams and Maintainer/Uploaders fields ?

> Christoph Berg wrote: >> Note that you can subscribe additional packages to any maintainer >> view. The GIS team does that: > > Is there a way to subscribe a mailing list to receive bug reports also, > without having the mailing list in the Maintainer field? > > Marcus On the PTS you can subscri

Re: Bruce Perens hosts party at OSCON Wednesday night

uild each other up instead of bickering over their preferred method and style of protocol? I'm not hopeful - human nature is overwhelmingly self-centered and self-absorbed. I'd love to be surprised. -- Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 21:08, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:41:52 -0800, Hex Star wrote: > > ah...russian spam...translated to english: > > [snip] > > Why bother? Gotta maximize the propagation of spam as much as possible. It's important, af

Re: We want to honestly apoligize to the whole Debian Community

ble. Sounds great, so long as that "you" is self-referencing and doesn't expect the rest of the group to take such veiled demands seriously, especially after your forgery stunt... -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's ti

Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:45, Henning Makholm wrote: > Listmasters have been trying to > identify the responsible subscriber with no luck Why not just 500 all posts from sites known to use challenge-response? -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Уникальные семинары!

On Thursday 23 March 2006 02:41, Henning Makholm wrote: > Scripsit Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 09:45, Henning Makholm wrote: > >> Listmasters have been trying to > >> identify the responsible subscriber with no luck >

Re: Уникальные семинары!

ISP that employs challenge-response, you are doing business with spammers. No loss to the net. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: idea for project machines

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 00:22 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Create a new custom chroot with the packages preinstalled on demand. Sounds like a use-case for combining pbuilder and cowdancer (or lvm snapshots). No time-consuming tarball extraction, disk usage is reduced and the original chroot

Bug#341344: ITP: python-urwid -- curses-based UI/widget library for Python

Package: wnpp Followup-For: Bug #341344 Owner: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I intend to package urwid for debian. I'm making packages now. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Installation is FANTASTIC!!!

On Wednesday 19 April 2006 01:37, Barry Drake wrote: > It is now far easier to install Debian than Windows XP - yes - really. And > I'm not a regular Linux user. And to all those who disagreed with me on this point about two years ago: I told you so... -- Paul Johnson Email a

Re: ip access pemit

On Wednesday 19 April 2006 12:06, Murilo Bernardes wrote: > i've got a email server and i'd like to permit access only to a few ip > numbers. can anyone help with this? Please don't ask to ask a question, just ask the question. What MTA do you use? What is the desired

Bug#351429: ITP: flasm -- command line assembler & disassembler of Flash ActionScript bytecode

retitle 351429 ITP: flasm -- command line assembler & disassembler of Flash ActionScript bytecode owner 351429 ! thanks I intend to package flasm for debian. I'll need a sponsor once I have packaged it. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: RFC: Better portability for package maintainers

On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 18:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Minimally, package maintainers and developers could take a look on our > > logs and see if there's anything wrong. If there is, in many cases the > > fix is obvious. > > You probably need to provide a view by maintainer in order to get >

free flash stuff WAS: Re: Sun Java available from non-free

On Mon, 2006-05-22 at 18:58 -0500, Anthony Towns wrote: > Java is one of the most important packages for which we don't have an > effective non-free replacement at present. The only one that I can think > of that would be more important would be flash. There is a gnash package destined for experi

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

dead fingers or I surrender it at the BC Ministry of Transportation and Highways (by that time, the backwater country that thinks Oregon and California shouldn't have an international boundary between them can kiss my ass). -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROT

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

ard, you have to surrender it to get a driver's license. You're only legally allowed one ID. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber pgpWNLJZwxsTn.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

rchased ID's > are acceptable in this community? That is a fact not in evidence with supplied information. As I gather, Martin was carrying a passport, his German ID and the quasi-fake Transnational Republic ID. If I had been presented with his TR ID, I would probably laugh and say, &qu

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

Please use reply-to-list instead of reply-to-all, I do read debian-devel. On Friday 26 May 2006 14:01, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > Given time, one can pay more atten

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

of how much you trust someone to thoroughly check identities before signing keys. OTOH, I haven't made it to a keysigning party since high school so I'm a little rusty on that part. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to m

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

new Oregon or California ones due to the lack of security features. OTOH, I live in a region with some of the highest meth consumption in the world, and I have had my identity stolen once. Damn you, social security administration... -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Friday 26 May 2006 15:20, Ron Johnson wrote: > Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:45:42PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > >> On Thursday 25 May 2006 15:26, Mike Hommey wrote: > > [snip] > > > [0] As long as he doesn't go

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Friday 26 May 2006 15:27, Ron Johnson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at > >> least two photo ID's issued by the government). > &

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

son why Cuba does the extra page on request. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber pgpi13qAzz2yi.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

llegal search to go home!" -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber pgpdW4ew8ZcdC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Friday 26 May 2006 18:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >> Given time, one can pay more attention to each document (I require at > >> least two photo ID's issue

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

eys of someone with an ID I don't recognize for the same reason I wouldn't sell alcohol to people with IDs I don't recognize when I worked for the Zoo: It's my reputation (and in the case of alcohol, my legal liability) on the line. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP &

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 11:34, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 07:03:27PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote: > >> Apparently the US makes it very clear that US Citizens are not to > >> be pestered at customs

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

ting machines to be opened separately in some other room. And if you still don't like it, you don't have to live here, everybody else already beat you to the punch. Oregon's full. -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber pgpukUZBWuxR7.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

t happens, it does apply to foreign nationals who are > under the jurisdiction of the United States. That's not what the courts have said during my lifetime, IIRC... -- Paul Johnson Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: Because it's time to move forward ht

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 13:41, Russ Allbery wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Friday 26 May 2006 18:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> You can get a passport. > > > > Yeah, if I really want to give a country I don't really have much of a

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:19, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I would be more inclined to do that to the people who signed his key > > based on the Transnational Republic ID. > > So, who are those people? Is Manoj one of th

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:12, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>> Oregon abolished the voting booth in 2000 > >> > >> Oh, so they get better counts and less fraud by doing away with ballot > &

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 15:28, Ron Johnson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Friday 26 May 2006 15:27, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> Paul Johnson wrote: > >>> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>>> Given time, one can pay

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 15:41, Ron Johnson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Friday 26 May 2006 13:40, Joe Smith wrote: > >> Apparently the US makes it very clear that US Citizens are not to be > >> pestered at customs > >> "OR ELSE". > > >

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 15:32, Ron Johnson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Friday 26 May 2006 18:34, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> On Thursday 25 May 2006 08:30, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > >>>> Given t

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 15:52, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If only that were true. The Americans give me hell. Canada > > practically waves me through. Last time I drove back to Oregon, US > > customs decided that it was

Re: Please revoke your signatures from MartinKraff's keys

a wrote: > >>>> On 27 May 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane stated: > > [snip] > > > That's precisely the issue. The standards of "reasonable" are > > different for minors than they are for 'normal' people. > > Minors are *normal*. They are n

Re: [Debconf-discuss] Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 16:12, Ron Johnson wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:12, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > >> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>>>> Oregon abolished the voting booth in 2000 > &g

Re: Please revoke your signatures from Martin Kraff's keys

On Saturday 27 May 2006 16:49, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The vote at champoeg was when the Oregon Territory voted to become > > Canadian. We're on the south side of the border exclusively due to > > the threat of mil

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >