If you read their downloads page they actually have some debs on their
own site, maybe instead of getting another lot of packages around the
world, convince them to get a sponsor and upload it to debian
directly...
Heres some links:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html - how
True I must say, it's not very user-friendly which we want debian to be.
On 30/05/05, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:53:24PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owne
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ipkungfu
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Rocco Stanzione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxkungfu.org/
* License : GPL
Description : iptables
Unless there is a related RC bug there, I don't think it's gonna
matter when the change is to get it in sarge (i personally have not
seen any RC bugs though...)
On 30/05/05, Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> People following the OpenLDAP packages might remember this change
http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php?ignore=sid&ignsec=on&fullcomment=on&new=7
thats a decent unoffical count...
On 30/05/05, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 11:57:52PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >...
> > Timeline
> >
> >...
> > 1 June 2005
> > ~1
I noticed that Adrian moved a bug report for a kernel in sid (2.6.10
(BIIRC) to the 2.6.8 kernel so it appeared as a Sarge RC Bug? I didn't
(Bsee anything that showed that it was a 2.6.8 problem, maybe it is, but
(Bit looked like second guessing to me...
(B
(BHow is this helping Sarge? If it
On 01/06/05, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IOW, it doesn't (directly) give meaningful predictions about the rate
> > at which a given piece of hardware becomes obsolete.
> >
> > It also has no capacity to predict an organization's *ability* to
> > replace hardware.
>
> ok, true
>
On 02/06/05, Thaddeus H. Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Langasek:
>
> > I challenge anyone to do volunteer release management
> > for a project with Debian's size and complexity ...
>
> No. After seeing what Steve does, I'd sooner volunteer
> to spar with Darth Maul than to manage a re
On 06/06/05, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ensuring that packages build and run properly on a wide variety of
> > architectures is _work_. I happen to think that it's worthwhile work,
>
> It is work, but it's up to the maintainer
On 06/06/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:13:50AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> > Matt Zimmerman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-06-05 12:55:
> > > I don't think there exists a bug tracking system which meets this need
> > > today, which is why Canonical is developin
On 06/06/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:45:59PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > On 06/06/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 02:13:50AM -0700, Stephen Birch wrote:
> > > > Is
I've just been reading on the wiki that someone things there should be
a pretesting branch for Debian, (good idea in my opinion), but why
don't we try and stop rouge packages at unstable. Some maintainers
obviously make mistakes every now and then while packaging "z",
sometimes (if not all the tim
It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use selinux,
so couldn't it be easier to have a coreutils-selinux package on the
side? just like how the kernel team maintain a couple different
branches of the kernel at the same time. There are people that
*REFUSE* to use selinux (persona
On 08/06/05, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Nigel Jones]
> > if "coreutils" is made absolutely dependant on libselinux1, then the
> > user gets no choice...
>
> One think is depending on the library, another is actually using
> selinux.
On 09/06/05, Manoj Srivastava va, manoj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:44:30 +1200, Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > It's been implied that people will be basicly *forced* to use
> > selinux,
>
> Where on earth did
On 17/06/05, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > gkdial -- PPP dial-up configuration and dialing tool [#287992]
> > * Orphaned 164 days ago
> > * 1 RC bugs.
>
> Does any graphical ppp frontend exist that can be used instead of this?
there is kppp (?) for KDE, and
On 19/06/05, Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm orphaning these packages:
>
> alsaplayer (bug #314841)
> dutch (bug #314839)
> dvorak7min (bug #314844)
I have interest in this, I really liked using this program
> libauthen-radius-perl (bug #314851)
> libarchive-zip-
ow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nigel Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 19/06/05, Ivo Timmermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm orphaning these packages:
> >>
> >> dvorak7min (bug #314844)
> &g
On 08/07/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
> through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
> last week.
>
> Total number of orphaned packages: 222 (new: 12)
> Total number of packages
On 08/07/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:57:25AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > I'm already seeing documentation referring to "Debian 3.2 (etch)".
>
> Where is this? It's certainly wrong for documentation to make assumptions
> about the release version n
On 08/07/05, Nikita V. Youshchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:03:09PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> Le Jeu 7 Juillet 2005 21:17, Josselin Mouette a ?crit :
> >> > If we don't start the multiarch effort now, it won't be good for
> >> > etch. Are we postponin
On 10/07/05, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:57:54 -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > I suggested "Debian IV"
>
> Are release numbers really needed? Why not do away with them altogether?
>
> --
> Thomas Hood
>
you mean, just stick with code names?
That wouldn't
On 7/10/06, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 09 July 2006 21:29, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > I've just poked around a bit in Alioth for a project I'm working on
> > and found a bug report with a bug number that has no resemblance to
> > anything in BTS, quite contrary to my initial a
> -Original Message-
> From: Loïc Minier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 24 July 2006 2:32 a.m.
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Getting rid of circular dependencies, stage 5
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le dimanche 23 juillet 2006 à 0
On 13/07/05, Anand Kumria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> I just read this article[1] in the SMH. I think there are a few points that
> you should keep when talking to the press in future:
>
> - don't "slag" them off / don't complain aobut the press
I don't see how his commen
On 15/07/05, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Anand Kumria:
> >
> > > [1]: > > http://smh.com.au/news/breaking/debian-debates-support-for-ports/2005/07/12/1120934228145.html>
> >
> > Apparently, this is subscription o
On 19/07/05, Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Nico Golde [2005-07-19 12:21 +0200]:
> > Heyho,
> > why is mentors.debian.net powered by Ubuntu?
>
> This gave me a good laugh, and it's certainly way better than "SuSE"
> or "Micro$$$ IIS" :-), but still a bit embarrasing...
>
I thin
On 20/07/05, Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:49:37AM +0100, Stuart Yeates wrote:
> > Maybe a good place to start would be to cross reference BTS with the
> > popularity-contest database. This doesn't measure annoyance, of
> > course, but it's a a great measure
On 21/07/05, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:31:48 +0200]:
>
> > If spam e-mail is going to start closing our Bugs in the BTS then we
> > should start thinking about implementing authentication checks in the
> > BTS... like for examp
On 22/07/05, Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> One of the oft-requested features for the BTS had been the ability to
> subscribe to bugs.
>
> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs in
> the Bug Tracking System. To do so, simply send an email
On 27/07/05, MaXeR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 July 2005 23:09, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > ti, 2005-07-26 kello 21:36 +0200, Moratti Claudio kirjoitti:
> > > Description : Vamps evaporates DVD compliant MPEG2 program streams
> > > by selectively copying audio and subpicture trac
On 27/07/05, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > Greylisting for Debian Hosts. Santiago Vila would like the project to
> > [5]consider using greylisting, a technique to delay mails, on Debian
> > hosts. Rich Walker [6]explained that some mail
On 02/08/05, Stepan Golosunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > Nothing. It was just a question, as Nikita sounds to be a female name,
> > but as I'm not sure about it, I was just interested. At least for me, a
> > Hungarian, it so
On 02/08/05, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:31:36PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > On 02/08/05, Stepan Golosunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > >
Has anyone considered that all these personal attacks/claims the
original is spam... is actually in itself spam, in exactly the same
way, actually Joe Bloggs down the street could subscribe by accident
and claim it's all spam because it's "un-wanted".
On 04/08/05, Anders Breindahl <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 09/08/05, Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>mini rant: what's the point in breaking important packages in
> unstable for significant periods (e.g. the bug above was filed
> 2005/07/13)? Isn't experimental more appropriate for stuff like this?
> Same for udev (requiring linux kernel 2.6
On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 08:15:13PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> > #320980: tetex-bin: Updmap error because a map file has not been found
> > Package: tetex-bin (tetex-bin 3.0-5.0.sarge1); Severity: serious; Reported
> > by...
> >
> > but 3.0-
On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 06:49:12PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > On 10/08/05, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Testing and BTS version tracking haven't been updated to play properly
> > &g
On 15/08/05, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> * Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 00:49]:
> > The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> > contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been
> > a bug since 2002, and most of thes
39 matches
Mail list logo
