>>>testing either. I am therefore surprised about the given answer to the
> >>
> >>"More than uncomfortable" does not mean "will not be included"
> >
> >Yes, it does.
> >
> >Someone will have to convince the security team someh
blogspot.com/2014/01/ffmpeg-and-thousand-fixes.html
> >
> > Well, that's... better than nothing. It's certainly part of an
> > overall strategy, although that number of issues still indicates to
> > me that there are style and architecture issues here that could
&g
^ ]'
Alexander Strasser (1):
Andreas Cadhalpun (1):
Andrew Wason (1):
Carl Eugen Hoyos (4):
Clément Bœsch (45):
Derek Buitenhuis (1):
Hendrik Leppkes (1):
James Almer (19):
Justin Ruggles (4):
Lou Logan (2):
Mans Rullgard (3):
Martin Storsjö (1):
Marton Balint (2):
Matt Oliver (2):
Michael Niederm
Hi
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 09:10:23AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
[...]
> > IMHO it's reasonable to expect core APIs to be upwards-compatible and keep
> > deprecated interfaces around for another release or two.
>
> This is exactly wh
sign
> the mail as he didn't consider himself an FFmpeg developer.
>
> At that time, we (we being root, ie Mans Rullgard, Diego Buirrun and me)
> explicitly tried not to involve MPlayer at all, because we thought of
> this as an FFmpeg internal issue. That's why mphq (th
other.
>
> I'd like to give here a short account on what happend before the split,
> even though this not the right place. I think i should write up something
> longer after my vacations and put it somewhere online.
>
> Before 2011 there were quite a few issues within FFmpeg
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 02:53:09PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 08/14/2014 11:59 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 08/14/2014 11:27 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/13/2014 07:53 AM, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/13/2014 06:30 AM, Michael
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 01:19:38AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Stefano Sabatini wrote:
[...]
>
> The list is quite long and debunking each of the statements could take a
> lot of time.
>
> I'm going to address two historical "misrepresentations":
>
>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:15:10AM +0200, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 09:14:47PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
> [...]
> > > Ive asked [1][2] back then what "policy in place" was broken
> >
> > - you tried to commit code that was blatantly below the already lax
> > quality requirem
Hi
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:16:50AM +0200, Attila Kinali wrote:
> Servus,
>
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:43:18 +0900
> Norbert Preining wrote:
>
> > By continuing old fights, inspite of the very clearly friendly and
> > open offers and suggestions byu Michael, you and others from AV continue
> >
Hi Vittorio
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:45:42AM -0400, Vittorio Giovara wrote:
> On 12/08/2014 18:30, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >Also ive offered my resignation in the past. I do still offer to
> >resign from the FFmpeg leader position, if it resolves this split
> >between
Hi Vittorio
also please dont remove ffmpeg-devel from the CC
I had missed that you removed it so my reply went just to debian-devel
full quote left below for ffmpeg-devel, no further inline comments
below
Thanks
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:17:55PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
