Package: portmap
Version: 5-5
Severity: serious
portmap should not silently switch to listening
to the localhost interface only.
This behaviour breaks things for every networked machine
that uses NFS for example.
This should not be the default behaviour.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3
On Wed, 28 May 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
>
> > We are running cvs.debian.org over an ISDN line. Currently the only
> > code under it is the Deity project.
> >
> > I can make other source trees and set up other users if others want to
> > do distributed development this way.
> >
> > Unfortunately,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 28 May 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW, psupdate is the only program I can think about using
> > System.map. Are there any other ?
>
> klogd
ksymoops
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset:
On 1 Jun 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Perhaps. Anybody have any serious arguments? I think the reason we
> > configure gcc as i486 is so it automatically optimizes for the 486; it's
> > a good middle ground.
>
> I think the only optimization gcc 2.7
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >I don't think it does any optimization at all for pentium.
>
> Correct. Of course, there's the experimental pgcc (http://www.goof.com/,
> if anybody wants to look).
>
> I'd like to pack this up and stuff it into experimental, if I had a
> little more t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I just had a look at ftp.xfree86.org.
They finally have 3.3 out.
Mike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM5J+gUAgIJ53sbT9AQEJ8gP/XaRFImH2den6zE5uMTct5YX4yrUKkxMS
LZyHcbgLQ+DyLIsxdhtykHja0IBeScc/gtpeKRu6Co6O5dBAdRlHMVw3i6TT
On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Michael Neuffer wrote:
>
> >This is not necessary. gcc 2.8 includes the pentium optimizations
> >from pgcc.
>
> All of it?
No not all, they took a stable subset.
Mike
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail t
On Fri, 6 Jun 1997, Philippe Troin wrote:
> What's the stability of hamm right now ? Is it usable ?
Yes it is. My machine here has been running on hamm for weeks.
A bunch of libs are still missing but otherwise it is quite functional.
Mike
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w
On 9 Jun 1997, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> > "GM" == Guy Maor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> GM: David Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> :: Must all new programs goint into unstable be linked with libc6?
>
> GM: Since Debian 2.0 is meant to be a libc6 system, the answer is yes.
>
>
This is from Linux kernel, and it sounds to me, that there might be
versions that we can distribute with Debian.
Mike
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 1997 20:05:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAI
On 15 May 1997, Rob Browning wrote:
> Pete Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > As my system is currently laid out, I'm not suffering from any shortage of
> > swap _space_ (240MB allocated, max seen in use is 33MB), I'm merely trying
> > to sneak out the best possible performance without spe
* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990923 16:15]:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 07:32:50AM -0500, Ashley Clark wrote:
> > Couldn't sash include a PAM module that would change the password to
> > match root's password whenever it was changed? Or am I oversimplifying
> > things?
>
> I don't have enough
* Ruud de Rooij ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990924 08:40]:
> Michael Neuffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990923 16:15]:
> > > On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 07:32:50AM -0500, Ashley Clark wrote:
> > > > Couldn't sash include
* Jason Gunthorpe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 08:45]:
>[...]
>ORBS - 314
> Comparing connections it is found that 3970 out of 40236 connection
> attempts would have been blocked. This can be roughly considered to be
> 3970 emails blocked.
>[...]
> ORBS deserves special mention because of
* Joseph Carter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000326 16:45]:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> > > Given every report I've heard to the contrary, I'm not sure I believe
> > > that. I've also been told that there are cases where their tests produce
> > > false positives.
> >
>
rs
Mike
--
-----
Michael NeufferPhone: +49 6131 540117
Zum Schiersteiner Grund 2 Fax: +49 6131 477288
55127 MainzMobile:+49 171 1406664
GermanyMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
- Start forwarded message -
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 14:19:09 +0100 (MET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
linux-security@redhat.com
Subject: Re: util-linux compromised
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender
* Douglas Bates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990523 03:30]:
> A friend recently bought a high-end Dell laptop computer. The model
> is the Inspiron 8000, if I recall correctly.
>From the graphics hardware it is an Inspiron 7000, there is no 8000
> Another problem we encountered is in the configuration
18 matches
Mail list logo
