What about simply decoupling mips/mipsel's version numbers so an out of
date package on mips(el) doesn't stall out the rest of the testing. Having
(somewhat) setup britney/update_out to generate testing for m68k, it
should just be a matter of adding of adding mips and mipsels, to the
proper li
I'm going to have to agree with this; I admin m68k buildds; I had to
preinstall most of the texex packages simply because it was taking hours
(and that is not an exaggeration) to install them all, and then remove
them all again. A trigger based system would help relieve this problem. I
had a si
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: devotee
Version : 0.1patch2
Upstream Author : Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.debian.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 31, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>> I doubt that I would be able to push this port through another release
>> in the current state. The consequence would by that the port dies
>> completely and with it the only free and released distribution
Maybe a check should be added to APT to flag a warning if there has been no
updates for a significant period of time? That way if a mirror ever does
that, its more detectable.
Michael
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 07:36:
Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFId//JpblTBJ2i2psRAu6uAJ48+knPTzxi1InA/Wg3AN4m2Rt8WwCfa/ES
rddl6+w/Kw+7UBVNQLjLplE=
=fGdJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:48:03AM -0400, Michael Ca
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like a pretty bad idea to NFU software
that can be compiled on an architecture even if it doesn't seem that useful.
I have the X11 libraries on my NSLU2, which lacks any graphical output, but
I use it as an X11 server.
That being said, I can see the point from
sbuild calls dpkg-buildpackage to build the package. It doesn't touch
the rules file directly.
On 8/8/08, Francisco Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believed buildd.debian.org was meant to build only binary-arch packages.
>
> But in recent build logs of the zeroc-ice package:
> http://b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not a DD so I can't add myself to the list; I'd like to see better
support for importing dsc files and binaries into the archive (aka to
importing an existing archives (import-archive now works though after
I gave it a lobotomy).
Database wise, t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a local mirror of m68k, and both kfreebsd ports, and they're
roughly 70-80GB including source. If ries has become so full that
space is becoming an issue, then dropping arm, hurd-i386, and m68k is
a stopgap move at best (your only going to recov
that list.
Michael
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Samuel Thibault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Casadevall wrote
>> kfreebsd-* is pretty close to releasable; they've got the archive
>> built in the high 80s, and are keeping up).
>
> BTW, it may be worth notin
I'll add my two cents.
I have some experience with radios. The FCC requires all radios to be
certified before they can be sold, and there is a requirement that you
must not make a device that is easily modifiable to operate outside
the limits put forth by the FCC. In this case, it would be illegal
The problem is you can't wave a magic wand, and fix the community.
It's a self-feeding cycle which goes on and on and on. Even if we had
a Code of Conduct for Debian, unless it was strongly enforced, its the
same problem.
Whether the ballot was valid or not was immaterial, the response to it
was c
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2008 17:55, "Paul Wise" wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Kjeldgaard Morten
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Another model that I think has not been discussed is never freezing
>> > stable.
>>
>> Freezing is the whole point
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 09:43 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Yes. Except that you don't have to go trying to find someone. You should
> > file a RFP bug against wnpp and wait until someone has sufficient
> > interest and sk
15 matches
Mail list logo
