Y+/luXjkLh5Byg6l
CzEiuOFnh+4=
=9l7l
-END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 31 Jul 96 09:22 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable stable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: lyx
Version: 0.10.0-1
Binary: lyx
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
lyx: High Level Word Processeor (BETA v
On Wed, 31 Jul 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 1996, Michael Gaertner wrote:
>
> > Ever heard of this "standard" for unix-package-management? How should we
> > deal with this?
> >
> How does one get a copy?
I can not help you - to get this you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 02 Aug 96 09:09 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: sudo
Version: 1.4.4-1
Binary: sudo
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
sudo: Provides limited super user privileges to sp
Package: xemacs, xemacs-support, xemacs-widget
Version 19.14-1
1) xemacs overwrites files from package emacs without having a 'replaces'
line.
2) xemacs is not configured because it depends on xemacs-support which
conflicts with emacs.
Michael
--
Mich
er.errorLogFile: /var/lib/xdm/xdm-errors"
Michael Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tel/Fax +49-761-32684
Emilio Lopes writes:
> EB> * added latin1.sty: Michael Meskens requested
>
> What is wrong with
>
> \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
Note that as my fault. I've been using latin1.sty for so long I didn't even
realize that this was a possibility. Sorry for
e centered, the second should be written in bold
face. Instead I get:
Test1
Test2
When looking for the problem I saw that richtext tries to read the "md"
sequence (available in /etc/termcap) but couldn't find it and thus removed
the bold feature. The same holds for center.
M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 06 Aug 96 08:16 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xforms
Version: 0.81-1
Binary: xforms
Architecture: i386
Description:
xforms: GUI Toolkit for X Window Systems
Changes:
Package: compress-package
Version: 1.2-1
Compiling and installing the compress source found on ftp.inria.fr I get a
file /usr/bin/zcat. However, gzip already install zcat in /bin. I cannot see
how it's useful to have both. :-)
Michael
--
Michael M
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.7.5-4
sendmail depends on deliver. However, in at least two common
configurations -- null client, and delivery by procmail -- it will run
perfectly without deliver. sendmail should only recommend it.
--
Shields, CrossLink.
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.7.5-4
This line in sendmail.mc:
FEATURE(local_procmail)
doesn't work, because it's looking in /usr/local/bin. This works:
FEATURE(local_procmail, `/usr/bin/procmail')
(assuming the procmail package is installed), but it shouldn't be
necessary to do this as
r emacs style since I don't use emacs.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ __
at, it also handles gzip files which the original
> zcat program cannot do. I think that we should have /bin/gzcat (or
But that means it can do more than the original one. So why not using this
name?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1996-08-07 09:57 +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>You (Michael Shields) wrote:
>> Package: sendmail
>> Version: 8.7.5-4
>>
>> sendmail depends on deliver. However, in at least two common
>> configurations -- null client, and delivery by procmail -- it will
Just wanted to let you all know that I'm working on a bug free release of
metamail. I'll take over maintaining it since noone else seems to do it.
If anyone else already works on it, please tell me.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL
ution: unstable stable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: lyx
Version: 0.10.0-1
Binary: lyx
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
lyx: High Level Word Processeor (BETA version)
Changes: lyx (0.10.0-1):
* New upstream ve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 08 Aug 96 07:25 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: modules
Version: 2.0.0-7
Binary: modules
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
modules: Linux module utilities.
Changes: m
I just found out that this bug is NOT in ncurses but in richtext. It
works
well with termcap but not with terminfo.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sorry, I send the last one too early. I reassigned the bug to metamail
already.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 4 Aug 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Sanders) wrote on 04.08.96 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Michael Gaertner wrote:
> >
> > > Package: xbase
> > > Version: 3.1.2-9
> > >
> > > FSSTND
Package: shadow
Version: 960530-1
with dpkg 1.2.13elf:
./shadow_960530-1_i386.deb
prints:
"dpkg-deb: 'shadow...' is not a debian format archive"
Michael Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tel/Fax +49-761-32684
Package: sendmail
Version: 8.7.5-4
After saying `/etc/init.d/sendmail stop', `/etc/init.d/sendmail start' will
not restart sendmail because it thinks it is already running. I think this
is because /var/run/sendmail.pid isn't unlinked for some reason.
This is a serious problem; if you edit /etc/m
ve. Since the Debian standard installation for floppy devices is
mode 660 with owner root and group floppy I propose to use the same
owner/group combination for fdmount.
Any comments before I create a new version?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __ _
At 1996-07-25 16:29 +, Guy Maor wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Jul 1996, Michael Shields wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't all non-cosmetic bugs [in buzz] be fixed?
>
>No, only serious bugs and security holes. Otherwise there would be no
>difference betweem rex and buzz. The definition of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 09 Aug 96 14:46 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: metamail
Version: 2.7-4
Binary: metamail
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
metamail: An implementation of MIME.
C
d.
> * /opt exists and is defined.
Sounds okay, too.
Couldn't we make only the changes we like?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 12 Aug 96 10:47 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: modules
Version: 2.0.0-8
Binary: modules
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
modules: Linux module utilities.
C
On Sat, 10 Aug 1996, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Michael Gaertner writes ("Bug#4076: shadow-package (not a
> deb-format-archive)"):
> > Package: shadow
> > Version: 960530-1
> >
> > with dpkg 1.2.13elf:
> >
> > ./shadow_960530-1_i386.deb
> &g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 12 Aug 96 10:49 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: metamail
Version: 2.7-5
Binary: metamail
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
metamail: An implementation of MIME.
C
LyX should be an official part of Debian.
What happens if I recompile it statically? Would it go into the standard
tree then?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
Package: uucp
Version: 1.06.1-2
uucp has several references to /usr/spool/uucp and /usr/spool/uucppublic.
These should be in /var/spool.
--
Shields, CrossLink.
Package: base
Version: 1.1.0-14
/tmp/base-1.1.0/prototype/etc$ grep majordom passwd
majordom:*:30:30:majordomo:/var/majordomo:/bin/sh
/tmp/base-1.1.0/prototype/etc$ grep majordom group
majordom:*:31:
--
Shields, CrossLink.
8_i386.deb and the directory in which the source is stored IMO
should be modules_2.0.0.
Comments anyone?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL
sing packages more easily.
> I'm all for having LyX packaged for Debian, and XForms too, but we aren't
> helping the user by putting it into the main distribution.
I understand your reasoning. But I think it's sort of discriminatory because
it's not under rex.
Mich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 14 Aug 96 11:01 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: lyx
Version: 0.10.1-1
Binary: lyx
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
lyx: High Level Word Processeor (BETA version)
C
At 1996-08-12 03:48 +, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
>Second, the lock file names *have* to be world visible, in order for
>locking to actually work among users... hmm, your suggestion of a
>one-way hash make sense, I'll pass it upstream and see if it goes
>anywhere (xemacs has built in md5 support, bu
contrib, too. And how
about the netscape installer?
> I forgot to ask about m68k, sparc, mips, and ppc. :-)
> (But I guess everyone got the point, anyway.)
I did.
> It may be just a matter of opinion. I don't think I have any further
> arguments, so it seems I can't convin
o? The only difference I'm aware of
is /usr/share/i18n instead of /usr/share/nls. But then this already holds
for libc5 starting with 5.4.0
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \_
5 Aug 96 14:15 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: symlinks
Version: 1.0-3
Binary: symlinks
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
symlinks: scan/change symbolic links
Changes:
symlinks (1.0-3) misc; urgency=LOW
.
rmation on
> your distribution specific fixes for the upcoming Linux Security FAQ
> Update...
So who's going to answer this report officially?
Note, that the RedHat fix was already announced.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
m-pid ???
BTW I won't discuss the mandated location per FSSTND or FHS - I don't know
the history. I also don't understand why you (here I don't mean YOU
personally) should use "xdm-pid" as it is clearly stated in both
"standards" you should use "packagename.pid".
Michael Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tel/Fax +49-761-32684
This one has to go into both releases as it fixes a security bug.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Aug 96 12:44 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: stable unstable
Urgency: High
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: sudo
Version: 1.4.4-2
Binary: sudo
Architecture:
-- 1 root root 1458 Feb 28 1991 suncmd.termcap
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
[EMAIL PROTECTED
hadow (vipw/vigr). Should I
add these to the shadow package, too?
4) Finally, how do I correctly set up the control file? I take it the
'Breaks:' option isn't implemented yet. But shadow breaks older version of
all packages that check t
o their next release.
> Perhaps now is a good time to look if we should consider using that too,
> or if we think that shadow is good enough for now.
If we can get PAM, too, I'm all for integrating it. What has to be done?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
s to keep the old one.
Should we create a second login package? Also should we try to package the
shadow su, too (and divert teh shellutils one)?
I'm going to changes jobs next month and I'd really like to finish my work
on this problem until then. I don't know if
Bruce Perens writes:
>
> Let's plan on having "shadow" be part of the base for 1.2 . We should thus
> have the default "login" be aware of it, etc.
But the question remains, which login? The standard one patched, or the
shadow one, or both and the user dec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Aug 96 13:58 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: metamail
Version: 2.7-6
Binary: metamail
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
metamail: An implementation of MIME.
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 19 Aug 96 09:34 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: sudo
Version: 1.4.5-1
Binary: sudo
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
sudo: Provides limited super user privileges to sp
ven worse, it's a
> `4750' binary in /bin -- so users are getting "permission denied"
> errors for something in their path.
Okay, I changed that. I will upload a new version once I'm back in the
office (Wednesday).
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
O the PAM framework is
> superior, as it supports shadow password files among others (give or
> take maybe a few options particular to the shadow package actually
> used).
What exactly does it offer that shadow doesn't?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 21 Aug 96 07:36 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: fdutils
Version: 4.3-4
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
fdutils: Floppy utitlities
Changes:
fdutils
ch is thought to replace passwd
2) shadow-login which replaces the standard login
3) shadow-su which diverts the GNU su binary.
Comments welcome.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROT
ded once as a PAM module to be
> available to all applications.
> ...
It seems it does not contain shadow completely, though.
Since the shadow transition is almost completed I wonder what we shoudl do
now.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_
which has no own file to install.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
[EMAIL
o wet my feet and to gain some
> insight about how simple or complex things are. After all, it's not a
> black or white thing, but we can PAMify application by application.
Sounds good to me.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ ___
files? In
particular a file with s.bit should be as secure as possible IMHO.
> I'm going to reopen this bug report. Sorry, Michael Meskes (but you
> should have heeded my warning).
No problem Ian. But then I'm not so sure if it's a bug
ite a lot of packages I never
read an announcement of. I usually read debian-{devel,changes,user,private}
so I take it I should have found this announcements. But I never have. Did I
just miss them? Or is there a problem with the announcements?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ _
a
^^^
> Debian distribution.
That's exactly the point. I cannot recompile any package that uses Motif
since I don't have it. But I can recompile LyX since we have an xforms
package available.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
apd Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Are there more? I recommend the maintainers have a look at
ftp://ftp.icm.edu.pl//mnt/340/shadow/src for help.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
le
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: shadow
Version: 960810-1
Binary: shadow-passwd shadow-su shadow-login
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
shadow-passwd: Manage shadow password and group files
shadow-su: su binary from the shadow password sui
I just needed this one:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 23 Aug 96 13:40 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: html2latex
Version: 0.9c-1
Binary: html2latex
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
html2latex: C
Package: bash
Version: 1.14.6-4
I've confirmed that this is a problem on i386.
>Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 1996 05:42:28 +1000
>Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 15:35:51 -0400 (EDT)
>From: Brian Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Best of Security <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version:
s at their option. It really isn't
> necessary.
IC
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/
Non-free is not part of the Debian distribution (in the
> most technical use of the term) and programs that depend on them belong in
> contrib (or non-free if they have distribution restrictions).
But with xforms belonging into contrib LyX i
st that's what I was told). A simple getpwnam doesn't
have the password "x" in the structure.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \
able. :-)
> source distribution restriction is what makes Xforms' proper location to
> be non-free.
It was once decided that binary-only packages belong into contrib.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \__
perior, so I
> think we should stick with it.
No problem with me. But just in case I let the group check in (since it's in
the upstream source anyway).
I'm preparing a new version.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 25 Aug 96 19:47 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: fdutils
Version: 4.3-5
Binary: fdutils
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
fdutils: Floppy utitlities
Changes:
fdutils
Package: ircd
Version: 2.8.21-1
In the postinst hostname is called with option -fqdn. However, there is no
option 'q' nor an option 'n'.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ ___
May 2 1994 irc.1
-rw--- 1 999 meskes 5559 May 2 1994 ircd.8
-rw--- 1 999 meskes 2191 May 2 1994 m4macros
-rw--- 1 999 meskes 2196 Dec 2 1994 rules
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED
cular I think I the
dependency between shadow-passwd and shadow-login have to be reversed. So
please make sure you don't install passwd without login.
Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 26 Aug 96 11:08 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: Michael Mesk
ctive slip
connection. If that is true, however, I cannot see any reason for it.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | \__ \/ /_ / // /_/ /_/ / _ \/ ___/ ___/
[EMAIL
Package: bind
Version: 4.9.3-P1-3
If you say yes at the appropriate prompt, bindconfig will create zones
called `localhost' and `0.0.127.in-addr.arpa'. This is correct, but it
could go further -- all of 127.0.0.0/8 is loopback, so it could provide the
`127.in-addr.arpa' zone with one entry, `1.0.
Ian Jackson writes:
> Can we please have a statement on what we should do ?
>
> I think we should post the release announcements to debian-changes as
> well has having the summary postings.
>
> If people want just the summaries we should provide a separate list.
I second all
similar case could be
> made for xosview as we now have procmeter.
>
> Opinions?
Remove them.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
Susan G. Kleinmann writes:
>
> Package: metamail
> Version: 2.7-6
Oops, wrong depends line. Please upgrade your mime-support package.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMAIL
good state. In fact
there's only one outstanding bug report and I'm currently compiling a new
upload to close that one.
The packages are:
adjtimex
fdutils
hkgerman
html2latex
joe
lshell
lyx
metamail
modules
mtools
perforate
quota
shadow
sudo
symlinks
xautolock
xcolors
xforms
xsysi
Is there a reason why dpkg-parsechangelog is so picky about the number of
blanks used? Does it really matter if I have one or two blanks between my
email address and the date? I think it could be a bit more user friendly.
Please keep in mind that not everyone uses emacs.
Michael
--
Michael
he
> executable. This is only likely to lead to confusion.
I think I understand what you mean. But is it really that bad?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
Sven Rudolph writes:
>
> I created an LPRng package for Debian. LPRng is an enhanced BSD-like
> print spooler and is nearly compatible. (It is available at
> ftp://iona.ie/pub/plp/LPRng/ ).
Is it's call compatible? Or does the user have to learn a new syntax?
Michael
-
ve to read
the manuals once again. Anyway, here's the .dsc and .changes file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Source: metamail
Version: 2.7-7
Binary: metamail
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: any
Standards-Version: 0.2.1.1
Files:
3401751ef93bd141f0179d3
Susan G. Kleinmann writes:
>
> Package: metamail
> Version: 2.7-6
> ...
A new version is underways.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | / ___// / // / / __ \___ __
[EMA
Package: xntp
Version: 3.5c-1
xntp's postinst only lets you input one timeserver. It would be easy to
have it allow you to enter multiple space-seperated timeservers, and output
multiple `server' lines into /etc/ntp.conf.
--
Shields, CrossLink.
Package: lclint
Version: 2.1b-1
While installing lclint, it says
grep: /etc/site-start.el: No such file or directory
This may or may not be cosmetic.
--
Shields, CrossLink.
o priorities.
> [...]
> This seems to be a problem with install-mime; or perhaps I did
Yes, that's right. My metamail package just calls install-mime.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
At 1996-08-28 21:59 +, Brian C. White wrote:
>I know that at one point the dselect/dpkg combination had fairly serious
>problems if the same package name existed with multiple versions. I learned
>this the hard way when I installed from a mirror that had not run to
>completion and thus had not
Package: trn
Version: 3.6-5
trn should provide the virutal package `news-reader'.
--
Shields, CrossLink.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 17:11:43 +0200
Source: metamail
Binary: metamail
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.7-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
metamail - An implementation o
/0BcJf+xVbPy5TAQjeLEhScFRxKC4K
VeeZlqnrBnfIz6h68Y22RtdKonNR5el7LaXcXatqZe+ygLeXRtIPo2RgcQ+IXsL5
4C7iuqsG/YvE8p0pvFTeA6qut547z4MY6FqrWy2Nc+0nPTBtkmSVa2wxLABATiv9
C11cDiP6QUY=
=VKND
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PRO
ainer: Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
metamail - An implementation of MIME.
Changes:
metamail (2.7-8) unstable; urgency=LOW
.
* Corrected font name in postinst
* Corrected rules file to not install /usr/doc/copyright/README
Files:
37fdef4f6625e4b0156b16055cec18
Package: emacs
Version: 19.31-2
movemail complains about not being able to write a temp file in
/var/spool/mail.
One fix might be to make it setgid mail, iff the code is written to be
sufficiently paranoid.
--
Shields, CrossLink.
Package: lesstif-dev
Version: 0.50-1
The header files are placed under /usr/include/X11/Xm. However, thex shoudl
go in /usr/include/Xm since they include others with:
#include
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ __
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Followup indicates that this will be fixed in NetKit-B 0.08, so we
should update to that ASAP.
--- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) ---
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from brimstone.netspace.org ([128.148.157.143]) by
nessie.crosslink.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESM
> Michael Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Package: emacs
> > Version: 19.31-2
> >
> > movemail complains about not being able to write a temp file in
> > /var/spool/mail.
> >
> > One fix might be to make it setgid mail, iff the code
bols, some even with
debugging sysmbols (at least strip -g is able to reduce the library size).
If these symbols are not needed I'd like to ask all libraries to be stripped
since it saves an awful lot of disk space. If for some reasons the symbols
are needed could anyone tell me why my libc wor
Ian Jackson writes:
> Well, how hard is it to compile out ? It's not the most awful thing
> that could happen to a program to have this unnecessary check, but I
> do think it will add confusion.
It's not that difficult. I'll take care of it when I release a new versio
Ian Jackson writes:
> When a package is uploaded an announcement should be posted to
> package name and version number, and a very short summary of the
> changes, in the PGP-signed be added before the start of the
Okay IMO.
> If a package is released with announcement should be posted to
have are:
adjtimex1.2-4
fdutils 4.3-5
gccbeta 2.7.2.l.3
hkgerman2-5
html2latex 0.9c-1
lyx 0.10.1
metamail2.7-8
modules 2.0.0-8
perforate 1.0-3
quota 1.55-3
xautolock pl10-2
xforms
501 - 600 of 4523 matches
Mail list logo
