[APT repo] Provide a binary-all/Packages only, no primary arch list

2023-12-02 Thread MichaIng
Hey guys, while checking how to best enable riscv64 support for Webmin's own APT repository, we recognised that APT falls back to/uses "binary-all/Packages" packages, but still complains with a warning if no "binary-riscv64/Packages" is present and declared in the Release file of the APT repo

Re: [APT repo] Provide a binary-all/Packages only, no primary arch list

2024-03-01 Thread MichaIng
Best regards, Micha Am 03.12.2023 um 15:27 schrieb David Kalnischkies: Hi, (I think this isn't a good mailing list for apt vs. third-party repo config… users@ probably could have answered that already, deity@ if you wanted full APT background which I will provide here now… reordered q