Bug#1003267: ITP: rocm-cmake -- AMD ROCm cmake modules

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: ROCm Team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: rocm-cmake Version : 4.5.2 Upstream Author : AMD * URL : https://github.com/radeonopencompute/rocm-cmake * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: CMake

Bug#1003270: ITP: rocm-smi-lib -- ROCm System Management Interface (ROCm SMI) Library

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: ROCm Team X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: rocm-smi-lib Version : 4.5.2 Upstream Author : AMD * URL : https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/rocm_smi_lib * License : NCSA Programming Lang: C++,

Fwd: ROCm installation [layout]

P.S. There was an issue on deb-devel and deb-mentors whose attachment limit is 100kB, sending again to avoid confusion... you can find the image at: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ai/2022/01/png1edBgW0YQi.png ROCm is AMD compute software stack, a competitor to nvidia CUDA. I have asked several

Re: ROCm installation

On 1/12/22 20:17, M. Zhou wrote: Hi, Thanks for the updates. On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 18:14 +0100, Maxime Chambonnet wrote: "Native" Debian packages are starting to cover a significant portion of the stack [2], and it would be great to figure out the installation topic The word &

Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue

On 1/31/22 10:35, Pirate Praveen wrote: On തി, ജനു 31 2022 at 10:07:32 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 8:35 PM Russ Allbery wrote: I do think that the amount of effort that the project puts into this pre-screening is of sufficiently high magnitude that

Re: Embedded buildpath via rpath using cmake

I don't know really where to add this bit of information in the discussion, so I am taking the latest leaf. The rpath trend, with or without cmake, is likely to continue as it is being reborn by spack, nix and guix. The points made by smcv about arbitrary code execution and reproducibility are inte