Re: Bug#762194: Summary:Re: Bug#762194: Proposal for upgrades to jessie (lendows 1)

2014-11-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2014-11-29 22:25 GMT+01:00 Svante Signell : > On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 22:01 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: >> On 2014-11-29 21:30, Steve Langasek wrote: >> > Debian releases when it's ready. If large numbers of our users are >> > going to >> > have a bad experience with jessie as a result of being switc

Re: length of a package extended description

2015-01-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-01-10 4:31 GMT+01:00 Russ Allbery : > Don Armstrong writes: > >> It would probably be ideal if there was a better way of indicating which >> latex modules were in each texlive package than currently, but until a >> better method is found, this is probably the best of bad options. > > +1. I c

Re: how to remove libsystemd0 from a live-running debian desktop system

2015-02-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-02-16 16:26 GMT+01:00 Alastair McKinstry : > [...] > An an example, i've been a long-term linux developer, DD; i've developed > and promoted Linux not just on the desktop but both in embedded systems > and in HPC systems. In all these I've been comfortable that I've been > able to adapt Linux,

Re: how to remove libsystemd0 from a live-running debian desktop system

2015-02-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-02-17 13:57 GMT+01:00 Alastair McKinstry : > [...] > > Examination after the fact showed that if I'd had the correct packages > installed, it would have worked. > So from a Debian perspective this was 'notabug'. > (modules that were not needed day-to-day had been deleted by hand to > make spac

Bug#779383: ITP: limba -- 3rd-party software manager

2015-02-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthias Klumpp * Package name: limba Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Matthias Klumpp * URL : http://people.freedesktop.org/~mak/limba/ * License : LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : 3rd

Re: aptitude has Priority: standard, why?

2015-03-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-03-31 15:18 GMT+02:00 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh : > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:14, Fabian Greffrath wrote: >> I am curious why the aptitude package still has Priority: standard, i.e. >> why it is installed next to apt in each and every Debian installation? >> >> Aptitude isn't recommended f

Re: Bug#791857: ITP: daemonize -- tool to run a command as a daemon

2015-07-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-07-09 19:25 GMT+02:00 Clint Byrum : > Excerpts from md's message of 2015-07-09 10:18:50 -0700: >> On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> >> > I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you >> > need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which >> > i

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
This is a feature of systemd and PackageKit. See http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/SystemUpdates/ The only thing which makes use of this feature is GNOME through GNOME-Software, so if you don't want this, removing GNOME-Software will be enough. Nothing else in Debian uses this[1].

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-08-25 23:53 GMT+02:00 Simon McVittie : > On 25/08/15 16:18, Michael Meskes wrote: > > And for the second time it > > destroyed my system by deinstalling a lot of packages, instead of > putting the > > conflicting packages on hold. > > That's the major issue here: packagekit and/or gnome-softw

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Calm down, people... A few more clarifications: 1) This feature is not enabled by default. It only gets triggered if a frontend tool makes use of it, and will not be activated automatically. So, you will only see it when you use GNOME with GNOME-Software or any other tool which triggers the funct

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-08-26 14:27 GMT+02:00 Michael Meskes : > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:26:13PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > 1) This feature is not enabled by default. It only gets triggered if a > > frontend tool makes use of it, and will not be activated automatically. > So, > > y

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-08-26 14:40 GMT+02:00 Matthias Klumpp : > 2015-08-26 14:27 GMT+02:00 Michael Meskes : > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 01:26:13PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> > 1) This feature is not enabled by default. It only gets triggered if a >> > frontend tool ma

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-08-26 15:17 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : > Am 26.08.2015 um 14:48 schrieb Matthias Klumpp: > > Actually, this query: > > > http://codesearch.debian.net/perpackage-results/trigger-offline-update%20-package%3Apackagekit%20-package%3Aaptdaemon/2/page_0 > > is more complet

Re: system upgrade by systemd

2015-08-28 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-08-28 6:03 GMT+02:00 Michael Meskes : > > Having just read this entire thread, and been affected by this once, it > > occurs to me that the likely answer has been offered, but I suspect you > > may have thought Matthias' reference to “GNOME Software” to be a generic > > answer (apologies if I

Re: system upgrade by GNOME (was: system upgrade by systemd)

2015-08-31 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-08-31 17:45 GMT+02:00 Russ Allbery : > Philip Hands writes: > > > Is it not the case that we're actually witnessing is: > > > Option e): get updates applied only at reboot, with no prior > > notification that they are available, such that people who always > > suspend, or simply leave

Re: Polkit: prompt for root password

2015-09-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-09-01 19:49 GMT+02:00 Jayson Willson : > I have also tried creating > /usr/share/polkit-1/rules.d/49-rootpw_global.rules with the same contents, > [...] The problem with that is simply that the PolicyKit in Debian Unstable/Testing/Stable does not read the JavaScript rules files. Only the ve

Re: [CTTE #741573] Debian Menu System

2015-09-04 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-09-05 3:49 GMT+02:00 Osamu Aoki : > [...] > >2. In addition to those changes, the Technical Committee resolves > > that packages providing a .desktop file shall not also provide a > > menu file for the same application. > > That's good idea in general. I hope lintian warning

Re: Our build system may be broken: /bin vs /usr/bin

2018-11-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:52 Uhr schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel : > > > Hi Ian, > > Thanks for the follow-up. > > On 19 November 2018 at 15:45, Ian Jackson wrote: > | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Our build system may be broken: /bin vs > /usr/bin"): > | > tl;dr: We may be messing up /bin and /usr/bin

Re: usrmerge -- plan B?

2018-11-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 21. Nov. 2018 um 22:51 Uhr schrieb Marco d'Itri : > > On Nov 21, Michael Stone wrote: > > > How many long-running production systems do you think people have run > > usrmerge on? I'd guess close to zero, since there is no advantage whatsoever > Actually I have quite a lot personally, with

Re: usrmerge -- plan B?

2018-11-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 23. Nov. 2018 um 13:45 Uhr schrieb Ian Jackson : > Russ Allbery writes ("Re: usrmerge -- plan B?"): > > This is a much better summary of the thread, and I wish that you would > > have said this instead of claiming incorrectly that those same people are > > the ones advocating for a full mer

Re: usrmerge -- plan B?

2018-11-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Fr., 23. Nov. 2018 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Stephan Seitz : > > On Fr, Nov 23, 2018 at 02:04:05 +0100, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > >If there are actual issues encountered, we can always revert a change > > And how do you revert this change? As far as I have understand you can’t >

Re: package management symlink

2019-02-05 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 5. Feb. 2019 um 12:03 Uhr schrieb Ansgar : > > Sören Reinecke writes: > >> I'm not convinced that having to remember different package manager > >> names is a significant problem for new people adopting a Linux > >> distribution. The name is a very small part of the > >> differences between

Re: Debian Buster will only be 54% reproducible (while we could be at >90%)

2019-03-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 6. März 2019 um 10:40 Uhr schrieb peter green : > > > Because of their design, binNMUs are unreproducible, see #894441 [3] for > > the details (in short: binNMUs are not what they are ment to be: the source > > is changed and thrown away) > To be specific, the source tree is extracted, then

Re: Question about Debian build infrastructure

2019-06-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 6. Juni 2019 um 20:33 Uhr schrieb Kyle Edwards : > > Hello all, > > I have been preparing Ubuntu releases for CMake on our own APT > repository for several months now. We did this by preparing our own > repository infrastructure - we have a machine that builds packages, and > a machine that

Re: Re: Content Rating System in Debian

2019-06-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 25. Juni 2019 um 10:15 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 09:31:44 +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > > Also, it seems clear to me that the same game in all Linux disros is > > very likely to get the same rating, so this would be better done as a > > distribution agnostic lev

Re: Re: Re: Content Rating System in Debian

2019-06-25 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 25. Juni 2019 um 11:51 Uhr schrieb Bagas Sanjaya : > > Simon McVittie: > > Appstream metadata, which is canonically provided by upstreams and is > distro- and package-type-agnostic (available in at least apt and Flatpak), > has this as an optional field for self-rating: > > https://www.free

Re: Content Rating System in Debian

2019-06-26 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mi., 26. Juni 2019 um 10:40 Uhr schrieb Bagas Sanjaya : > > On 25/06/19 20.19, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > [...] > > So APT need to do what you mention, that is determining age rating not > only based on AppStream metadata, but also on system locale? Yes. Since the thin

Re: mandatory source uploads (was: Bits from the Release Team: ride like the wind, Bullseye!)

2019-07-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 8. Juli 2019 um 09:14 Uhr schrieb Thomas Goirand : > > On 7/8/19 12:34 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > As long as your build-depends are properly versioned, why can't you just > > upload all the source and let wanna-build sort it out? > > > > Scott K > > This means that I have to baby-sit th

Re: Is it the job of Lintian to push an agenda?

2019-07-13 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 13. Juli 2019 um 22:04 Uhr schrieb Vincent Bernat : > > ❦ 13 juillet 2019 11:52 -07, Russ Allbery : > > >> Previously, we had a sort of agreement (through the TC decision) that > >> such scripts should be maintained by people caring about them and we > >> should only act on bug reports wit

Re: CITL Releasing 7000 defects/vulnerabilities

2020-11-01 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am So., 1. Nov. 2020 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Xavier : > > Hi, > > Ubuntu is based on testing and does not import our fixes after its release > (except a few list), then it's normal to find a lot of vulnerabilities. See > https://lemonldap-ng.org/documentation for exemple > > > Le 1 novembre 2020 14:

Re: Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2020-12-29 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 17:39 Uhr schrieb Marco d'Itri : > > On Dec 29, Ansgar wrote: > > > as suggested in [1], I would like to see Debian to move to support > > only the merged-usr filesystem layout. This would simplfy things for > > the future and also address the problem with installing file

Re: Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only?

2021-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Di., 29. Dez. 2020 um 23:13 Uhr schrieb Marco d'Itri : > > On Dec 29, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > > For package upgrades, we can already perform so-called "offline > > upgrades", where the system reboots into a smaller systemd target, > > applies a

Re: Appstream + Gnome

2020-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi everyone! Sorry for the delayed reply, I was busy with traveling around during the new year. For that matter: Happy new year! :-) I am the upstream maintainer of AppStream as well as in Debian. Am Mi., 1. Jan. 2020 um 13:17 Uhr schrieb Jeff : > > Firstly - apologies for sending this to -devel.

Re: opentmpfiles & opensysusers, and its use in the Debian policy

2020-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 2. Jan. 2020 um 17:28 Uhr schrieb Ansgar : > > Thomas Goirand writes: > > [...] > > I'm not sure why > > there's both /bin/systemd-sysusers and /usr/bin/systemd-sysusers, and > > which one should be used. > > For the same reason there is /bin/bash and /usr/bin/bash probably? I don't have b

Re: opentmpfiles & opensysusers, and its use in the Debian policy

2020-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 2. Jan. 2020 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Simon McVittie : > [...] > I seem to remember a systemd upstream developer being asked during > recent discussions whether they were willing to guarantee that > systemd-tmpfiles and systemd-sysusers will continue to work when used on > non-systemd-booted sy

Re: Appstream + Gnome

2020-01-02 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 2. Jan. 2020 um 21:58 Uhr schrieb Jeff : > > On 02/01/2020 16:53, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > > @Jeff Did your changes include adding a launchable tag? If not, adding > > one may already fix this issue. > > Yes, I had. > > > When transitioning: > > 1)

Re: opentmpfiles & opensysusers, and its use in the Debian policy

2020-01-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Sa., 4. Jan. 2020 um 00:16 Uhr schrieb Russ Allbery : > > The Wanderer writes: > > > What I'm concerned about is dbus socket activation, or similar, leading > > to e.g. logind getting activated by logging in at the text console. > > > I thought I understood that socket activation via dbus was o

Re: Heads up: persistent journal has been enabled in systemd

2020-02-06 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Do., 6. Feb. 2020 um 17:12 Uhr schrieb Simon Richter : > > Hi Marco, > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:08:28PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > > There are still a large number of > > > Debian users opting away from using systemd (and still use Debian, not > > > derivatives). And what about non-lin

Re: DEP-14: renaming master to main?

2020-06-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 22. Juni 2020 um 23:30 Uhr schrieb Colin Watson : > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 05:50:02PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > there has been a lot of talk recently about how master is a loaded term > > that should be avoided. > > If I read the news correctly, github and others are going to chang

Re: no-strong-digests-in-dsc MBF

2017-01-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-01-18 0:14 GMT+01:00 Stuart Prescott : > Hi Adrian, > >> I want to do a MBF for all packages without a SHA256 checksum field >> in the .dsc [1] - only SHA1 as hash would not be good in stretch. > > I missed two details here: > > * why is this worth going at all > > * why is this important enou

Bug#886238: Please introduce official nosystemd build profile

2018-01-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2018-01-07 20:00 GMT+01:00 Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com>: > On 1/6/18, Chris Lamb wrote: >>> > (accusing Debian to "vandalize" open source by supporting systemd) >> […] >>> 1) Proofs please. DDG & Google find only your words. >> >> I was accused of this on the "dng" mailing list. It should be e

Re: no{thing} build profiles

2018-10-21 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am So., 21. Okt. 2018 um 18:13 Uhr schrieb Marvin Renich : > > * Sune Vuorela [181021 06:05]: > > On 2018-10-21, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > I disagree that libgpgme11 should depend/recommend/suggest gnupg at all: > > > As a library it cannot possibly declare how tight a relationship to > > > d

Re: no{thing} build profiles

2018-10-22 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Am Mo., 22. Okt. 2018 um 17:32 Uhr schrieb Marvin Renich : > > * Matthias Klumpp [181021 14:04]: > > libgpgme is communicating with gnupg in the background - having > > libgpgme without gnupg itself will render the library completely > > unusable and break existing users

Re: Debian packaging with meson

2017-02-17 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-02-18 0:29 GMT+01:00 Simon McVittie : > On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 at 18:08:01 -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> GNOME 3.24 modules have begun including meson build scripts. > > It looks as though Meson approximately follows the Autotools-like > build pipeline that dh assumes, so something like this shou

Re: AppStream Re: Depends/Recommends from libraries

2017-03-10 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-03-10 9:05 GMT+01:00 Rebecca N. Palmer : > On 10/03/17 00:10, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> >> I think a lot of those appstream installs are from KDE and GNOME which >> install plasma-discover and gnome-software by default. > > Do those things display AppStream "packages related to this hardware" by

Re: Graphical package installers & debconf (was: What's a safe way to have extensions in chromium in Debian?)

2017-03-23 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-03-23 22:04 GMT+01:00 Sean Whitton : > Hello Jeremy, > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:14:35AM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> It is also useless for someone who will install Chromium from the >> Software app (gnome-software) included in 'gnome-core' since the >> Software app does not display debco

Packaging of libraries with unstable ABI (D, Rust, Go, ...)

2017-05-18 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hi! Recently, I have been packaging some libraries written in the D programming language[1]. Since the D team didn't have many libraries packaged, there was no policy on how to package libraries, so I packaged them like C/C++ libraries: Make a shared lib package and have the software requiring it d

Re: Packaging of libraries with unstable ABI (D, Rust, Go, ...)

2017-05-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-05-18 19:52 GMT+02:00 Sean Whitton : > Hello Matthias, > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 04:37:58PM +0200, Matthias Klumpp wrote: >> Looking at what other languages with the same problem have done, there >> are basically two ways to deal with the issue: >> >> 1) Re

Re: Packaging of libraries with unstable ABI (D, Rust, Go, ...)

2017-05-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-05-19 2:35 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Matthias Klumpp wrote: > >> Unfortunately though, the D language ABI isn't stable, so any future >> compiler update might break the software in weird ways unless all D >> software is reco

Re: Please add lzip support in the repository

2017-07-03 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2017-07-03 14:42 GMT+02:00 Maria Bisen : > [...] > 4- As a result, lzip is almost never used alone (without xz), and Debian can > justify forever the lack of lzip support > > You need to consider all four points to understand the issue. No, please read again the mails previous developers wrote. Lz

Re: binNMU or reproducible builds (choose only one)

2015-09-27 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-09-27 17:54 GMT+02:00 Paul Wise : > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >> Let's answer that one, and if the answer is "lets drop binNMUs", then we can >> work towards source-based auto-NMUs being at least as easy to use/trigger as >> binNMUs currently are. >

Re: Future of the Linux upstream tracker

2015-12-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-12-06 22:54 GMT+01:00 Ponomarenko Andrey : > [...] > But ... Good news everyone! I've spent about a half-year to implement an > open-source alternative of the tool from scratch and I'm glad to inform you > that it's finally ready and available at: https://github.com/lvc/abi-tracker > > So ev

Re: AppStream / DEP-11 support now available in the Debian archive

2015-12-16 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2015-12-15 1:45 GMT+01:00 Charles Plessy : > Hi Matthias, > > congratulation for this release ! > > In the upstream-metadata project (https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata) we > document some information, some of which is redundant with what is now found > in > AppStream, and some of which is n

Re: overlayfs (was: Re: support for merged /usr in Debian)

2016-01-07 Thread Matthias Klumpp
I am using overlayFS in Limba[1], and it works well (and is really fast!) for read-only filesystems, read-write sometimes has issues if you are using multiple OverlayFS layers (which made me adjust the code so this doesn't happen anymore). 2016-01-06 17:29 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Dowland : > I wish I c

Re: Going ahead with non-free-firmware

2016-01-09 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2016-01-09 21:15 GMT+01:00 Marco d'Itri : > On Jan 09, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:51:08AM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> > I think there was consensus to introduce the non-free-firmware section >> > and move the non-free firmware blobs there. I'm wondering what w

Re: Before I send a bug report to change DebTags please do some sanity check

2016-02-08 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2016-02-08 15:14 GMT+01:00 Ben Hutchings : > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 15:10 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> [Ben Hutchings] >> > I don't think it's there yet, but AppStream will get some support from >> > upstream developers (including through existing .desktop files) >> > whereas debtags presuma

Re: opinions of snappy packages

2016-06-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
2016-06-19 21:51 GMT+02:00 Zlatan Todoric : > > On 06/19/2016 09:12 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> >> [...] >> This is an annoying habit for many of their projects and it might be a >> part of the reason why many of their interesting projects do not really >> take off. >> >> $ apt search snapcraft >

<    1   2