On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 01:24:54AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Somehow, you managed to miss the point entirely in your first line,
> *even though* you restated it later.
I don't miss the point at all.
> You have assumed that it is ok to break the user system and warn
> people about it.
> It
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 02:56:30PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> OK, so basically you think ftpmaster people should spend review each ITP for
> such global rejection reasons, then? You can't expect this to happen in any
> remotely timely fashion, at least not with this many ftpmasters and this
> man
On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 05:22:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Nobody said that ftpmaster must see all problems from ITP. But - every
> problem that is seen at ITP time saves volunteer time for more usefull
> things.
That actually appeared to be exactly what Marc was asking for when he
started
Has anyone investigated what would be necessary to get a non-root syslogd
working under Debian? It seems like this would be a good thing, but obviously
there have to be some tricky bits, else it would have happened already. :)
It seems like the steps would be:
Add a user for syslog to run as.
c
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-08
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: t38modem
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Vyacheslav Frolov
* URL : http://www.openh323.org
* License : MPL
Description : T.38 Fax over IP
/*
* $Id: README,v 1.7
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:49:46AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >gphone (#161708), orphaned 293 days ago
> > Description: X/GTK-based internet telephone.
> I'd thought there'd be more people interested in this kind of thing...
There's newer, vastly more widely implemented stan
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Jochen Voss wrote:
> I was surprised to see this, because I never got a notification for
> this bug via email (despite the fact that I'm the package maintainer).
I've had this happen to me a few times in the past. I'd always ascribed
it to my personal e-
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:52:20AM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> IMHO, the DAM wait is only one part of the problem. A lot of would-be
> developers are already pleased to find a mentor/uploader. To my personal
> experience, RFS in debian-mentors gives only a limited response and even
I can't speak
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 12:31:41PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The "What, Debian 3.1 ships 10 CDs but this common program I need for my
> work that was in Debian 3.0 is not included?" would do much harm to the
> reputation of Debian.
Have you actually looked at the list of buggy packages? I do
Karl M. Hegbloom said on Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:01:19AM -0700:
> http://www.infrastructures.org/papers/bootstrap/bootstrap.html
While this is a good paper, and there are lots of interesting ideas contained
within it that map well to Debian (I've got 50 or so Debian boxes in a
configuration inspir
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:17:37PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> actually i don't because i have no access to any arch except x86 and
> alpha. but that is only true for non-DDs like me and (i presume) you,
> DDs have access to all those architectures.
Although even with access to machines dependi
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:43:52PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Okay, so when somebody is not able to set their EDITOR variable, isn't
> it quite safe to assume that they are not the people who are satisfied
> with vi as their editor?
It could also be that they are people who only ever uses vi
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:47:38PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Because it is fixed in upstream CVS and I have not merged the patch into
> > the Debian package,
> If it's fixed in the next upstream release I would also set the Upstream
> tag.
The upstream tag do
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 03:05:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 02:52:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The upstream tag doesn't help with filtering out uninteresting bugs from
> > the default bug list.
> Add '&exclude=upstream' to
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 05:02:53PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Yeah, I know, but let's pretend I mean 'fixed-upstream' or some
> yet-to-be-added tag.
What, you mean like the way the pending tag often seems to get used :) .
> > Besides, that doesn't help the default bug list :) .
> I'm not *ove
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 06:01:44PM +0200, Cédric Delfosse wrote:
> I don't understand why a cpufreq patch is needed for kernel. With a
> recent ACPI (like in 2.4.22), you can change CPU performance (for a P4,
> I don't know for PPC) like this:
Well, quite apart from anything else ACPI isn't going
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 02:49:59PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Do we actually need a default print service at all? Mail is much more
> fundamental, for example, but lots of computers these days don't have a
> printer attached at all.
We needn't install a print service by default but if someone
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:32:19PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > About the same as finding a sponsor, then, with about the same ease of
> > maintenance afterwards (i.e. you still have to run your changes past
> > someone, not upload them directly).
> E
Joe Wreschnig said on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 04:39:10PM -0500:
> > And is a much better choice than expecting every user to locally
> > configure smtp settings in the MUA. Lack of direct-SMTP support in mutt
> > is a good thing.
>
> SSMTP is not acceptable for those of us that use SMTP AUTH+TLS, un
Joe Wreschnig said on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:43:49PM -0500:
> Interesting. I'm running unstable, but I can't find instructions on
> enabling TLS anywhere (nor does SSMTP seem to link to any TLS
> libraries). I see mention of it in the README (specifically, only a
> credit for it), but not the manu
Joe Wreschnig said on Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:32:14PM -0500:
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 18:04, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > I'm not sure why ssmtp has TLS disabled by default; perhaps a bug should be
> > filed? It seems like it would provide all of the needed outgoing MTA
>
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch .
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, li
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:02:20PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Also aren't mails between AM, DAM, Advocate and NM archived somewhere?
This is not the case for at least the AM<->NM mails. Also, advocating
someone is basically just a virtual tick in a box.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 11:34:05AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Consider printers, for instance. The home user wants to see printers
> without configuring them. The large-office admin, on the other hand, might
> want the reverse, i.e. to have printers NOT show up when they're NOT
> there. ZC c
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:08:52PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> Well, either you were lucky, or you use good and well configurated mail
> tools. But if my language did need a funky encoding, I would not let my work
> depend of such conditions. Don't get me wrong. I mean that in such
> condition,
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:22:03PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> With the former (and still widely used) method for translating debconf
Is anyone maintaining statistics on how widely used the original Debconf
scheme is?
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fev
applying the separate
sections idea to the whole of Debian)
Does anybody have any additions for thses ideas, or any ideas for other
changes to aid sarge+1 development?
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://www.tildemh.com
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ight
be a useful QA metric.
Please keep galeon specific replies to debian-gtk-gnome, generic replies
here.
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://www.tildemh.com
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:35:59AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Packages entering sid should be checked for uninstallability (caused by
> depends on outdated libs) and a rebuild should probabily triggered in
> some sane way (i.e. wait for the arch to get uptodate on the failed
> lib and th
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 10:25:24AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> So speak up Mark, what do you mean with changed?
I meant identifying that bug X was fixed in version Y; packages in
experimental contain the fix but sid and testing packages do not (yet).
I think this feature would be e
t useful.
I don't think I like the idea of automatic propagation from experimental
to sid as suggested in some replies - it's easy enough for package
maintainers to upload/copy to sid when the time is right. They are the
people who can judge this timing the best.
--
.''`. Mark
That's why I wanted a decision to include galeon to be made on
debian-gtk-gnome rather than taking all the responsibility myself :)
(I was also concerned about releasing a developmental version in stable
- this is my first Debian release after all)
--
.''`. Mark Howard
:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 01:35:12PM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> with is that the C-R system in question ignores the fact that SMTP
> headers are trivially (and regulary) forged. I believe this is deliberate,
> and that TMDA does not attempt to verify that the recipient of the
> challenge tru
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 04:07:58PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You do realise that all parts of SMTP are generally completely
> > unauthenticated and can be trivially forged? A system like this has no
> > option but to wor
ombody would look at
it and hopefully work in it. Submitting patches also have the wonderful
effect of motivating developers to spend more time on the project.
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://www.tildemh.com
`- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 05:16:40PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Most MTAs support rejecting unknown destinations at the SMTP level.
> They don't generate bounce messages in such cases.
> It's a pity if Postfix can't do this. So far, I assumed only qmail
> had this weird property.
Postfix supp
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 08:21:22AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:35:25PM +0100, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > - TMDA should carry a warning to the user about possible consequences
> > of activating the C-R mechanism, including sending spam, risking
> Sorry, but no. I
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:24:37AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 10:41:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That doesn't help all that much - it's also important see why the bug
> > has been closed.
> Because it is fixed...
The trick is wo
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 07:37:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > to fix the bug. As a submitter, would you feel satisified that you had just
> > gotten such a mail?
> Probably yes because the mail would start with
> This is an automatic notification re
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:38:48AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> Debian is not in the habit of editing its history (mailing list
> archives). Don't start down that slope.
Spam is routinely removed from the BTS.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 08:22:33AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Obviously this option leads into a conflict with some subsequent
> packages relying upon a working EMail configuration within the
> same installation session.
> My suggestion would be to use debconf only.
The packages are using deb
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:17:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Krzyzaniak wrote:
> W li?cie z pon, 08-09-2003, godz. 06:41, Matthew Palmer pisze:
> > Is there a page somewhere that I can point people to for all translation
> > work relating to Debian (DDTS, po-debconf, etc)? Just trying to make the
> > deb
Zygo Blaxell wrote:
I have exim configured in daemon mode and I use xinetd instead of inetd.
The last two security updates left me with no running exim daemon and
nothing listening in port 25. The latest one was nice enough to create
an /etc/inetd.conf that was empty except for this line:
smtp
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:05:46PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.21.1644 +0200]:
> > effects (better hardware support, more features, better
> > performance or what have we) are generally seen to be worthwhile.
> ...
Steve Kemp said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 10:45:11PM +0100:
> > While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> > I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> > Any suggestions ?
>
> /etc/cron.weekly/sysklogd
>
> This script rotates all the files which are output
Matt Zimmerman said on Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 07:43:04PM -0400:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:59:02PM -0700, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
>
> > Please do this instead. I'm not sure why sysklogd does it's own
> > rotation[...]
>
> Because sysklogd doesn't have a
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:13:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> There is no point for me working on those bugs if the patches will
> just rod in the bts or be thrown out so as not to differ from
> upstream. As I said before I won't work on the debian package again
> without an assurance by
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:01:52AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Well-written C++ using well tested class libraries tend to do a pretty
> good job, security-wise.
I often find that well written code does a good job.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asterisk-sounds
Version : 1.0.9
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
http://www.asterisk.org/html/downloads/asterisk-sounds-1.0.9.tar.gz
* License
,
Yes I discovered this as I completed the package and tried to installed.
No I believe these are spoken by Allison, with the exception of the monkey
sounds. :-) I'll include a comment in the description.
Thanks,
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asterisk-sounds-moh
Version : 20050715
Upstream Author : Enjoy Elena Kuschnerova and Lev Guelbard
* URL : http://www.signate.com/moh.php
* License : Public
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asterisk-prompt-it
Version : 20041110
Upstream Author : Marco Menardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
ftp://213.156.62.146/pub/linux/asterisk/sounds/it/it_mm_sounds_200
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libccscript3
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : David Sugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/ccscript/
* License : GPL
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libccaudio2
Version : 0.7.6
Upstream Author : David Sugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/ccaudio
* License : GPL
Description :
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:44:14PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> if you ask me any bug is worth fixing, also if only a single user complained
> about the problem. So why spending effort in "rating" bugs?
Some of the relevant Bugzilla developers have articulated a couple of
reasons for their voti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Purcell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kiax
Version : 0.8.4
Upstream Author : (c) 2004 - 2005, Emil Stoyanov and the Kiax Team
* URL : http://kiax.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Description : IAX
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:41:10PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Is this acceptable to everyone? Suggestions on how to do this better?
Hi Lars,
by all means, proceed! Who say FLOSS lacks 'innovation'! Debian devs
seem to comeup with good ideas all the time! Also, have you determined
if any pattern
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 01:13:04PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> It's trivial to add uids to a GPG key, and headers aren't actually
> signed anyway, so you could replay signed messages to the server.
A global, confirmed "by default subscribe me to all my bugs" might do
the trick, though.
--
"You
It seems most of the 6.8.2.dfsg.1-4 packages,
while listed in Packages are not in the pool.
Well not on mirrors.kernel.org anyway.
Is there a better/more up to date mirror?
Thanks, mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:56:26PM +0200, Mathis Dirksen-Thedens wrote:
> Hi,
> Ryan Murray did not answer my email which I sent some months ago, so I propose
> someone helps him with his work and takes over the "at" package. Most of the
> bugs are very old, and usernames longer than 8 chars are ST
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 07:13:43PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> What happens if a package maintainer ignores upstream's
> version number (either on purpose, or by accident, e.g.
> a typo)? Is this allowed?
It depends on the situation - for example, nis ignores the upstream
version number complet
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:19:46PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >>> I'm not sure if any additional AMs are necessary -- there is a
> >>> sufficient quantity of them
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:31:36PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On 02/08/05, Stepan Golosunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > Nothing. It was just a question, as Nikita sounds to be a female name,
> > > but as I'm not sure abo
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 10:42:17PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have been in the whole NM process for more than 13 months now. I
> > spent around 6 months with my AM, around another 6 to be a
inter on where I can get
> instructions
> on creating and using driver update disks?
>
> Or are they simply a collection of .deb files for device drivers?
>
> Thank you
>
> Mark Allyn
Hi Mark,
In the windows words, 'Devices' need 'Device drivers' (maybe dll
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 06:46:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Since so many packages need to be fixed, I may resort to additional
> private mails (or d-d-a mail) before I begin filing bug reports. The
A mail to d-d-a would probably be a good idea in any case - I can't be
the only person who's neve
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:04:34PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> I suggest using a bigger mailbox for your d-d-a subscription if one
> mail a week is considering «flooding». Even when said mail is 4500
> lines long.
One of the things with d-d-a is that it's not a list where you want to
have pe
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:29:51PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Wouter Verhelst]
> >b) the three beforementioned teams could already refuse to
> >support a port anyhow, simply by not doing the work.
> This is not really a valid argument. If a team in debian refuses to
> accept de
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 11:24:48PM +0200, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > well, if the package is bogus from the language usage, than that's not
> > the porters problem (but how often did that hit exactly one arch?). If
> I have seen multiple examples of builds failing because the testsuite or
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 01:42:18AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> one day (as the buildds do) is certainly acceptable. OTOH, lagging
> behind for several weeks (which is not unreasonable for folks without
> a phat pipe) is certainly not, especially if you are in a period of
> massive transitions.
Du
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:22:32PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2005 20:12, martin f krafft wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=pkg&data=openvpn&archive=no&version=&dist=stable
> What is "Unclassified" all about?
No tags that it chooses to use for classifi
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:50:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> What do others think of the new, extended subdivision of bugs?
In general more control of the sorting would be nicer. Right now
there's an awful lot of categories which I'm finding makes bug listings
a lot more cluttered without adding
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 05:55:28PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> The following is a list by maintainer of the 497 packages that still
> contain code in their postinst to create links in /usr/doc/. That's been
> a bug since 2002, and most of these packages have probably not been
> updated since then, si
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:08:58PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Package: lists.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to have a debian-planet list that would receive blog postings
> from planet.debian.org.
>
Hi Chris,
I'd second that. I was just trying to find a post on planet ab
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Debian unstable & testing still carry around libc5, and some associated
> > packages like altgcc, libdb1, ld.so and a few others.
> Hmm, i386 only?
Yes, the
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 03:46:34AM +, The Fungi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 11:18:01PM -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
> [...]
> > I was told on #debian-devel that, yes it is in-precise, so I am just
> > wondering why would it *not* list all the files? What defines if a file
> > is included
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:02:41PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> FWIW, this bug has only been reported once (and reassigned to portmap)
> see #261484 so its seems Debian users don't get beaten by this too often.
There's at least two people who have reported this against nis too.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:44:49PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Well, my idea is to fix only the rpc servers which cause trouble (ie.
> started early). and if this is only ypbind it needs to be modified to use a
> fixed port and register itself with pmap_set.
Most of the NIS services (includin
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:27:14PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> dependencies won't help for this problem. The only real option is to
> change libc/portmap/all RPC services to consult a blacklist of ports
> shipped in libc/portmap.
Given that none of the upstream libc maintainers who I've seen
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:50:52PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> In the past, there were important blog entries by Martin Joey
> Schulze on security, by Branden Robinson on Debian trademark
> issues, and some interesting thoughts on the upload process by
> Martin F. Krafft to name just a few. I'm pr
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:17:53PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> IIRC leafnode complains about "localhost.localdomain" refusing to suck
> news unless you manually specify a domainname in its configuration file.
> Maybe you remember that trouble?
> Still, I've ever considered that an issue wi
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:02:55PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Or am I getting confused and d-i uses localhost.localdomain as the default
> hostname, and say, if I had told it that my machine is named "twerk", domain
> "foo.bar" I would get a
> 127.0.0.1 twerk.foo.bar twerk localh
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 10:41:13PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 09:38:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It's complaining because upstream wishes to strongly encourage users to
> > configure things so that they have a globally unique hostname par
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:34:21PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:32:35PM +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:10:22PM -0600, Arthur H. Edwards wrote:
> > > I work at a government laboratory where computer g
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:41:09PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 22:00 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > The main things that this thread shows me, is that it is *not* immediately
> > clear to people not too familiar with Debian that the removal of the 'gnome'
> > pack
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #195948
Owner: Mark Nipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just in case someone gets to the end here like I did and
is wondering where the workaround list is, the URL is:
---
http://workaround.org/pipermail/dspam-debian/
Hopefully that is okay to give out. Wasn
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 12:16:35PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> You know, here SPF could help us. There is no reason at all for people to
> complain that they cannot send email from bugs.debian.org, db.debian.org and
> some other special *subdomains* of debian.org. This does not im
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 03:32:57PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Saturday 22 October 2005 12:08, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Rudolf Weeber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: dspam
> > Version : x.y.z
> > Upstream Author : Dee
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 03:33:21PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sunday 23 October 2005 03:10, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ...and hope that nobody wants forward e-mail from those domains using a
> > virtual table or equivalent to somewhere doing SPF checks.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 11:44:50AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The next upload (which is in NEW already) adds libeid and the eidviewer;
> the former allows a programmer to read out identity information and
> pictures from the card; the latter provides a GUI to interactively view
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Ernesto Mora
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm very interested in using the Debian Linux operating system but it's very
> difficult to me download the iso image cause my internet access is very
> limited by now, and the local connections are too s
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:09:46PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I will then merge mainline into my branch, do any conflict resolution
> necessary, and give it a quick test to make sure nothing seems to have
> been broken in the meantime. Then merging my branch back into
> mainline is, as you say,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:55:56PM +, Hector Oron wrote:
> 2008/2/25, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > What? You don't have a set of Toy Story Action Figures yet?
>
> As i see on news today, sudafrica has an openning to hunt elephants
> again because they have so much, but some
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/02/08 at 00:42 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > Google are running their Summer of Code programme again this year[1],
> > and if we want to take part again we need to apply between March 3rd
> > and March 12
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:51:41PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Does this not also suffer from the problem that branches made from my
> > triggers branch become unuseable or difficult to merge ?
> git merge --squash is more or less equivalent to appl
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:11:17PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> But Guillem wants to review and understand the code. In this process,
> he will rearrange the changes in smaller logical chunks.
Ah, the impression that has been created on the lists is more that the
patches were being NACKed and
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:12:41PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * John Goerzen:
> >> Some of the official, published GIT trees are constantly rebased.
> >> Apparently, the rule is not set in stone.
> > Which ones?
> The pu and (less often) the next branches in the main GIT repository.
Right,
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 04:26:56PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Question: how do I get the newer, correct version of the
> .orig.tar.gz into the archives (replacing the earlier version
> uploaded previously that does not match upstream's)?
You need to give it a new version number - it is not poss
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:48:40PM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Is there available data about the overhead of enforcing various SELinux
> policies?
>
> Quantitatively,
> Pierre
Is this in comparison to 'having SELinux support' which is what I
understand was the case for Etch.
-k
--
| .''`. ==
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:43:47PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Could you *please* give me the bug number,
If you can't find a relevant bug you should report a new one (anyone can
do so). See:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
for instructions on how to do this manually or ther
501 - 600 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
