that tried all combinations within the 8 char limit, it'd be pretty
easy to at least do that. I've tested other distributions like
slackware, slack7 allows a 126 character password at max which is a
really good thing. Just a recommendation.
-Mark
eady and
uploaded. At that time I'll post an announcement to debian-devel.
Cheers,
Mark
and
associated data. You can then drop that partition image onto a new/blank
disk, that does not have anything in the MBR, and once Clonezilla restores
the image to the new partition, will put the MBR in place and the machine
boots on its own the next time, with no extra work (I just did this last
week with a new hard drive). This has been my experience with using
Clonezilla and Lenny, at least. So it may help in your case.
Mark
personas, todo incluido. Y la posibilidad de salir como billonario.
Una calidad de comida perfecta, un servicio genial y además ... precios
normales.
Mas información etc. en www.alicantetimes.com
Les esperamos.
Mark
Restaurante El Flamenco
www.Alicantetimes.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I tried turning off bluetooth via the icon in the upper toolbar in Gnome 3 in
Wheezy oldstable, which I run WITH hardware acceleration on PowerMac G5 Quad, a
feature I obtained easily without troubleshooting kernel recompiles in Stable.
It's n
Package: general
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
It seemed after I installed 8.8-Jessie-upgraded packages on my 8.7.1 Jessie on
my PowerMac G5 the graphics were reset.
However, UNFORTUNATELY :..I needed to use an ATI graphics card to get
my screen working prior to the upgrade. So wh
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 11:54:05AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Could you elaborate on that? Why is it so painful?
> Probably because you need maintain packages for both unstable and
> testing at the same time.
This is exactly what happened
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 08:56:45AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh, it would be easy for me to break the tetex-packages (and cause lots
> > of FTBFS bugs) just by applying all the great ideas about improved
> > packaging that I have in mind. No upstrea
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:35:19AM +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> On Saturday 23 October 2004 05:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Your ability to
> > ask for features in the software programs that you use is one of the
> > advantages of libre/free software.
>
> Errm, can&#x
Hi DD folks,
just a simple question.
Is there a policy for /var/backup and
what is it for or how should it be used?
If there is a URL, google didnt show anything.
TIA
-Kev
--
(__)
(oo)
/--\/
/ |||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
"Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
D
Hello,
I've just installed aide for woody but it was required to
move /etc/aide/aide.conf to /usr/local/etc/aide.conf.
Can someone reproduce this if it's a bug or not ?
--
Best Regards,
Mark
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:14:57PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> But that could as well be achieved by parsing the configuration files:
That is exactly what packages were the Debconf configuration winds up in
a configuration file have to do. However, Debconf answers will not
always wind up in con
Hi DD folks,
i made a diagram in xfig of what I think is the debian development
model. Could folks give me a few comments on what's not correct.
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.png
TIA
-Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
(__)
(oo)
/--\
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:55:45PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Kevin Mark [u] wrote on 09/11/2004 18:29:
>
> >i made a diagram in xfig of what I think is the debian development
> >model. Could folks give me a few comments on what's not correct.
> >http://kmark
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:07:36PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> Please stop following up to this ITP and telling me you don't understand
> the description unless you have prior experience of L2TP in an ISP
> environment. If you don't know what L2TP is or how an LNS fits into the
> picture, th
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:57:56PM +0100, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:17:37PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > However, I'd be *highly* agitated if someone gave my daughter a
> > CD-ROM with *any* nudy cartoons.
>
> I'd rather live with this risk than with less freedom.
only
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:04:15PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think that the best solution to many of the worlds problems would be to
> > provide really cheap laptops and good net access (including satellite net
> > access). The idea is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:45:25AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 07:53:41 +0100, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Quoting Fernanda Giroleti Weiden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> Hi all, I read all the thread and I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:36:56AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:54 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:57:56PM +0100, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 06:17:37PM -0600,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:04:06PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> On Thursday 02 December 2004 10.36, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:04:15PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> >
Hi fellow debianista,
the package in question has not yet been accepted.
For a pacakge to be accepted, here is conditions some have mentioned:
1) dfsg-free
2) can not be sexist
3) has to be able to be mirrored by all mirrors based on the laws of the
location of the server
4) can not offend someone'
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 05:19:44PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >Would country/region-specific jigdo files be a reasonable
> >solution?
> >
> >
> I don't think we've enumerated all of the data paths that can generate
> problems. I guess jigdo means the general category of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 10:07:59PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Bruce Perens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It shows that sexual harassment in the workplace is one of their big
> > concerns. And rightly so. Awards have been as large as $30
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:24:19AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 22:08 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > A legal opinion on this matter would be a good idea...
> >
> > Keep in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 06:51:23PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 03 December 2004 16:19, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > 2) can not be sexist
>
> Bad idea. We should avoid subjective criteria.
>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 04:09:04AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Is a bit of flash or rom that much bigger than ram? Isn't most of the
> space in the dongle air or filling material?
Space is space on the board (not to mention the complexity of the board)
as well as three dimenisonal space.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 04:54:14PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> - why is dmesg 0644? This is not really a problem, but do users
> need access to the boot messages?
The log buffer can normally be read using the dmesg utility (or similar
code) as well as via the log file.
--
"You grabbed
Hi Folks,
I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
appreciated!
Also, the source is *.fig. Can anyone point to a similar
.deb of a graphic document so that I can see what documents a graphics
file needs so that I can make a GPL & DFSG compliant package. I exported
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:47:02AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi Folks,
> > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
> > appreciated!
>
> It's "volatile", not "
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:30:21PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> hi,
> * Frederik Dannemare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-05 12:43]:
> > On Wednesday 05 January 2005 09:50, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > what about an RFS tag for ITPs or and RFS bug report for
> > > wnpp. So debian developers who li
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 11:16:44PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:04:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:08:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> >> Ken Bloom wrote:
> >> > http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the
> >> > ReleaseProposals topic
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:56:13AM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Hi Kevin!
>
> * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050103 07:08]:
>
> > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
> > appreciated!
>
> What is the target grou
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:38:46PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Kevin Mark dijo [Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:49AM -0500]:
> > Hi Folks,
> > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
> > appreciated!
>
> Very nice! I expect to use it at s
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 07:52:22PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050107 19:46]:
>
> > Yes, a legend for the acronyms would be fine.
>
> Oh, I just saw, that your diagramm has a legend. I'm wondering, why I
> didn't noticed it the other day..
>
>
> Y
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> || On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500
> || Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> km> Hi Folks,
> km> I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments
> km> appre
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 02:26:51PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Mark Brown: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> x86info: x86info.1.gz
This isn't Debian-specific since I contributed it back upstream. I've
contacted upstream about relicensing it under the GP
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 10:47:50AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on
> > non-critical
> > systems..."
> > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:46:19PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> With the proviso that static linking against libc6 is more likely to
> introduce ABI problems via nss than just dynamically linking against an old
> libc6 ABI (i.e., GLIBC_2.0 or GLIBC_2.1).
Not to mention the LGPL too. Static lin
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 06:46:03PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:17:07PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2005-02-03 03:15:41, schrieb Sam Watkins:
> >
> > > 1. People (including children) will get a nasty surprise when they
> > >choose to download all the comics
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 04:47:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Based on the work of Kevin Mark (URL not available, sorry), I have
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.png
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/debian.fig
> made a graph of the life cycle of a Debian packa
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 07:08:49PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * martin f. krafft:
>
> > Based on the work of Kevin Mark (URL not available, sorry), I have
> > made a graph of the life cycle of a Debian package for inclusion in
> > my forthcoming book (http://debianbook
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:25:15PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> However, now we've suddenly discovered that _other_ programs get confused by
> this! In particular, if you use an NFSv4-patched mount, it does a
> gethostname() and resolves that, which returns 127.0.0.1, which in turn makes
>
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 11:21:09AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Mark Brown writes:
> > ...NIS needs to hand out the IP address of the machine...
> Machines don't have IP numbers. Interfaces have IP numbers. Every machine
Actually, that's not quite the case (as a number o
Hi debianista,
after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a totally new
concept. any comment appreciated.
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.png
http://kmark.home.pipeline.com/newdebian.dia
cherio,
Kev
ps.
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Hi Kev, list!
>
> On Tuesday 15 February 2005 08:27, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagram to produce a to
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 11:24:18AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Great work! I am glad to see you got down with dia; I love that
> tool. Here are some comments:
Its cool that it exports to xfig as a way to use both tools.
>
> a. I am not sure what the "process realm" is.
ACK. r
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:11:33PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > h. There are more rules as to when packages migrate from unstable to
> >testing.
> > i. You use both meanings of "priority" (changelog and control)
> >without making it clear wh
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 05:34:38PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 02:27 -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > Hi debianista,
> >
> > after my initial work on a diagram, and the comments and the work of
> > madduck, I had some time to redo my diagr
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 07:34:27AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Kevin Mark [Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:09:03 -0500]:
>
> > > And I've never read "ITO" as a tag for orphaning bug. Either one mails
> > > to -devel (or wherever) saying that they intend to give
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 08:04:21AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
Hi Martin,
>
> source package: dsc + (diff) + orig.tar.gz
> binary package: deb
> source upload: changes + list of files therein
I added some of this to my diagram. not 100% yet.
> nah, we turn software into debian packages by
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:53:28AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > although, now I am getting confused about the difference between a
> > debian developer and a debian maintainer. I labeled most items with 'DD'
>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:33:24AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:57:47PM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >> Clint Byrum spamaps.org> writes:
> >> > Now, can someone please tell me how messages like the one below,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 04:30:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:53:44PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > >> Hypothetical daily KDE builds would also insanely incr
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:35:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:13:42PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >
> > > Do the buildd people read this list? How do we get this cleaned up?
> >
> > As far as I can t
Hi tired and overworked folks,
I recently got some help from a fellow in cuba(Maykel Moya) to translate
my diagram into spanish. I have added some bits about the autobuild
network but have not reconciled it with my original bits. On the far
right is the unincorperated bits. Its now at:
http://deb
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:57:25PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Considered that ftbfs bugs for scc architectures are not going to be
> RC any more, people will stop fixing them, thus the scc architectures
Some may, but some would continue to be helpful. My experience doing
porting work was that pr
effect change. For example, I'd be willing to run for a position on the OASIS
Board of Directors the next time there is an election.
Hope that helps...
Cheers,
Mark
{1} http://perens.com/Articles/OASIS.html
Claire
[1] http://lwn.net/Articles/124548/
[2] Lawrence Rosen, Bruce Peren
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 09:35:38PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> That suggests that FTBFS bugs for SCC archs will be ignored just as
> long, 1/2 - 3/4 of the planed release cycle. Now imagine a bug in fsck
> that destroys data being left open for so long.
In my experience doing this sort o
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:50:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> What that actually means is that when porters want to stabilise, they'll
> be able to simply stop autobuilding unstable, fix any remaining problems
> that are a major concern, and request a snapshot be done. That'll result
...
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:54:24AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> If you wanted to make the decision _with_ the input of developers, why
> did all the powers that be vehemently deny that the number of
> architectures was a problem for the release schedule, right until
> everyone turned on a platt
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:26:33AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> >Would it also be possible for porters to update the snapshots in some
> >manner beyond having an apt source equivalent to the security archive
> >added by d-i?
> It'd be possi
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:01:06PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On some mirrors?
> -> Not all mirrors have to mirror all ports.
The mirroring part of the proposal is effectively just a proposal to
rearrange the archive in order to make this easy for mirror admins.
--
"You grabbed my hand and we
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 06:30:00PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> The need for gcc-2.95 usually means the source code is broken (in C99
> terms) and should be fixed. Do you have an example of an use case where
> this is unfeasible, and which is important enough to justify continued
> maintenance of
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 12:27:33PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> impediments (like licensing problems), do people generally think that
> it's reasonable to do this even if the other packages aren't really
> part of the upstream package? If so, are there usual mechanisms for
> doing this? What a
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 06:53:47AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:21:46PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> >> I can do the analyzing, but what should I do with the results?
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to be a black
I'm moving house and am told it could be 15 days before I
have broadband on at the new location.
So I maybe offline for the duration.
Please NMU as necessary, but include the details in the BTS.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 08:10:03PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> It turns out that there is no need for them to be hurt at all. Lone
> can carry on working as before and find a co-maintainer who won't get
> in his way. But when Lone falls off his horse he'll be glad that Tonto
> is nearby.
...
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 03:07:10PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 December 2005 12.23, Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> > I don't think that it is ridiculous to require that every package have a
> > team behind it---i.e., at least two maintainers. First, if someone can't
> > find ONE oth
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:40:22AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> The other side, and we've seen some people say this in this thread already,
> is that even if a maintainer asks for help, he may not get any - IIRC nis
> was one such package, and I claim that its still used by quite a few, so
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:26:10PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> For architectures that are not release candidates, we are going to need
> another way to track "release critical" bugs. The whole point of having
> architecture criteria is so the project can give higher priority to i
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 01:03:21AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 10:11:57AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > > The difference is who does the work.
> > I a well-team-maintained package, the work is actually done by "the
> > team", and decisions are made after finding a consen
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 01:39:01PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> To prepare for the eventual removal of makedev, I propose that packages
> currently depending on it will add an alternative dependency to udev.
> Also, policy should be amended accordingly.
It might be useful to tell the maintainers
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 04:12:23PM +0100, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> I have noticed that directory
> debian/dists/experimental/main/binary-i386 is empty.
> Where is new "experimental" repository?
Unless there is a problem with the mirror you are using that directory
should contain a Release and P
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 07:11:26PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> I suspect a similar system for Debian might increase visibility and
> commitment from a large set of users.
With the exception of the web forums and most of the commercial stuff
that does sound rather like debian.org.
--
"Yo
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:59:12PM +0100, Andi Drebes wrote:
> Hi there!
> I'm currently developing an application for library management (real books,
> CDs, etc). I'd like to distribute it over the internet, because I think it
> could be useful to other users. As I'm using debian and like it prett
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:20:07PM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> > we need to promote the easy entry points to contributing to debian
> > more prominently and should hide the "how to become a DD" in
> > comparison.
>
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > What on earth for?
>
> And
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:03:24PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Having said that, I'd also like to have non-ubuntu-specific patches be
> fed to our BTS; that would really make me feel there's a strong policy
> of giving back. While my relationship with people at ubuntu working on
> gksu is
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:03:14PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 1/13/06, Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Please stop trying to twist my words around. Canonical didn't contribute
> > > back. An individual who happened to work for
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:03:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> However, to the degree that the Ubuntu patches have these sorts of
> gratuitous changes that shouldn't be merged with Debian, the patch
> database quickly becomes useless. The current patch system is only useful
> if a maintainer can
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:34:33PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I can't agree. From the sound of this and other threads, there are a number
> > of folks who are unlikely to be satisfied with any behavior on the part of
> > the Ubuntu project
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 09:42:22AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Um, I have said nothing against crediting maintainers in the
> > packages. I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label
> > which is the Debian maintainer and which
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:36:43PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > would it be usefull if the Ubuntu Maintainer would add a
> > 'ubuntu-specific' usertag to those bugs in the Ubuntu BTS as a way of
> > telli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:47:15PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On 1/17/06, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As it is, to me, Ubuntu is just a group of people, some of which might
> > have names[1]. I find it hard to work with such a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:26:05AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 10:01 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-17 11:36]:
> > > Kennedy wasn't a citizen of Berlin, either, not literally. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 05:58:20PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:47:18PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 09:23:30PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > * Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-1
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 06:56:56PM +0100, Amaya wrote:
#include
and thanks for your time to write such a useful note about how you and
others are keeping Debian great!
>
> It leads me to think Debian accounts should expire in a year of no
> activity and packages be automatically orphaned, but it
en the developer is unable to reproduce because of the
differences between a derivative and Debian
3. complaining in #debian when they should be asking on an irc
channel of the derivative (eg. #knoppix)
At some point in the future Debian may have similar discussion with other
derivi
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> As said bvefore, if you activate this mode manually, this should be an
> easy feature to add on. How do you want to configure it?
>
> Eduard.
Hi Eduard,
I was just struck by your choice of phrase. It, in a way, expresses
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 11:08:57AM +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > I think you're overly optimistic :-) Most of the simple RC bugs
> > (related to the xlibs-dev transition) have been fixed; there aren't 90
> > more like those. Those left are:
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 05:58:54PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 02 février 2006 à 09:10 -0700, dann frazier a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 03:05 -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > > [dann frazier]
> > > > * Package name: slimscrobbler
> > > > Description : SlimServer plug
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 06:16:29AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 09:41:55PM -0500, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Josselin,
> > I have read many descriptions that made no sense to me and it was
> > mentioned that you either
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:58:09PM +, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How to I contribute an application to Debian?
>
> I am the developer of the application and it is released under GPL
>
> Regards,
> Michael Rasmussen
>
Hi Michael,
there is documentation on the debian.org website f
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:14:04PM +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 13-02-2006 15:38:16, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >there is documentation on the debian.org website for developers under
> >the developers sections. The basic thing is to read about the 'ITP
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:25:07PM +0300, =?UTF-8?Q?
=D0=9F=D0=BE=D1=80=D1=82=D0=BE=D0=BD_?=
=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9B=D1=8C=D0=B2=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=87 ?= wrote:
> First, I suggested .zip just for an example. There are other similar
> archivers with bigger compression ratio.
>
>
> One
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:13:04AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Xavier Roche dijo [Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 10:55:57AM +0100]:
> > > > Fonts or documentations are not softwares, for god's sake!
> > > everything that is not hardware is software
> >
> > So a cat is a software, or a hardware ? Do I have t
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:55:22PM +0100, Guerkan Senguen wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: freebsd-manpages
> > Version : 6.0
> Wouldn't this package conflict with
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:42:19AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 03:30:38AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:02:57AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 11:55:22PM +010
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:29:52AM -0800, Peter Khwatenge wrote:
> Do you have a program that can change .rm to mp3 or wave files? If yes, how
> can I get one?
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Peter,
there is software to do this but your questions should be asked on the
de
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 02:11:30AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> No, the point of Java is to allow users to run Java software, which
> they may or may not have written themselves, and which may or may not
> be free software. Examples of all permutations of the above are really
> easy to find. C
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:42:55PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
> >> The availability to do this is enough even if there are other
> >> (possibly better) ways to do the same. One fr
1 - 100 of 1222 matches
Mail list logo
