> [EMAIL PROTECTED] reads debian-devel . He's made noises about working
> together before.
Yup, I'm here (but I don't necessarily read debian-devel very closely).
We are about to embark (well, sometime in the next few months) on the
design for RPM 2.0. Would it make sense for us to set up a maili
> We have a list at Pixar that could serve the purpose - debian-dpkg
> isn't used for anything much at the moment.
...
> I think it would be good for the Red Hat people to have their own list
> - that way we can choose to crosspost or not to crosspost. I expect
> that most of our messages would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
> Right now, you can't expect it to be trouble-free, because there is no
> package conflict mechanism on redhat
True, we don't yet have a mechanism whereby you can indicate that
package X conflicts with package Y, but if package X would overwrite
any files
"Alexander O. Yuriev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I trust you are all aware of the information released to
> bugtraq/linux-security and linux-alert mailing lists about the vulnerability
> of mount/umount utilities in Linux.
> I'd really appreciate if you provide some official informa
4 matches
Mail list logo
