Around 14 o'clock on Mar 10, Joey Hess wrote:
> Back history: I added xprt-xprintorg to the desktop task at the end of
> January after receiving bug #226605 which stated that
>
> More and more applications like Firebird, Thunderbird, Mozilla, Java,
> Openoffice and more need it so the
> de
Around 12 o'clock on Mar 11, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Keith said Xprint is increasingly irrelevant, but I'm not aware how this
> language issue can be satisfactorily solved without Xprint.
Mozilla is currently integrating Pango support for complex text layout
issues; using that for printing would
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 23:27 +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> The only *listed* offers for Oregon are:
>
> OR, Bend: Nick Rusnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> OR, Medford: Sam Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> but I'm not familiar enough with US geography to know if that's close
> enough.
Those are quite a
I'd like to apologize to the systemd maintainer team, and to Tollef in
particular for my TC vote on the libpam-systemd bug.
The discussion on this issue was an excellent model of the Debian
community at work:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746578
Josh Triplett (who is
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> Keith, welcome to our Technical Committee!
Thanks, Lucas, and all of the rest of the Debian Tech Committee for your
support. I look forward to serving the Debian project in this additional
role to the best of my ability.
--
keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpWC0RklOgW2.pgp
D
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 11:54:53 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> It is with excitement and trepidation that I write to you today about the
> status of multiarch support in Debian.
Thanks for the update. I'm afraid I haven't been paying close attention,
but a cursory se
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:04:23 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The convention I've adopted so far for udeb-building packages has been to
> install libraries in /usr/lib instead of to /usr/lib/$arch.
Ok, that makes sense to me. Of course, it's also harder for me to manage
in the package as I'm insta
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:14:07 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yep, looks almost identical to my patch here, with only one difference: the
> runtime support packages need to be marked Multi-Arch: foreign in order to
> satisfy the dependencies of the multiarch libraries. Attached. (This is
> also b
Steve Langasek writes:
> Long ago I heard rumors of development work on mesa that would allow it to
> function as a proxy library, so that apps would link against libGL as needed
> and the GL implementation would use a hardware-accelerated GLES driver where
> possible, falling back to software GL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Keith Packard
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers
* Package name: ruby-prawn-templates
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Gregory Brown
* URL : https://github.com/prawnpdf/prawn
Simon McVittie writes:
> One thing that the ftp team clarified somewhat recently is that in
> most cases, we must track all the copyright notices that exist in the
> upstream source, and copy them into d/copyright.
As an example, I've got a package in the new queue with a 5077 line
copyright fil
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Keith Packard
* Package name: cmark-gfm
Version : 0.28.3.gfm.12
Upstream Author : John MacFarlane
* URL : https://ithub.com/github/cmark
* License : BSD, MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description : GitHub enhanced
Alexandre Viau writes:
> On 2018-05-31 12:33 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> [11] https://wiki.debian.org/MemberBenefits
> Oh, this reminds me of something.
>
> Has anyone gotten replies to their requests sent to
> debian-st...@collabora.com for the Steam subscriptions mentioned in the
> MemberBenefits
Phil Wyett writes:
> Any thoughts and how suil should be better packaged welcome.
Any reason you couldn't create a binary package (suil-binaries) and then
two virtual packages (suil-qt and suil-gtk) which had the appropriate
dependencies on the necessary toolkit? Presumably suil would need to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
