Re: udev event completion order (was: Re: Debian Installer team monthly meeting minutes (20051214 meeting))

2005-12-18 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:52:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Dec 18, Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > An alternative appears to be to process events in series... or maybe > > delaying > This was the precedent approach, and it's much slower (also, it cannot > be implemented anymo

Re: overriding udev rules

2013-09-09 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 09.09.2013 20:50, schrieb Lennart Poettering: >> It's now a Debianism to stick to the persistant names, all support for >> it has been removed upstream. From upstream we hope DEbian eventually >> drops support for the old persistant names

Re: overriding udev rules

2013-09-09 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 08:50:48PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > [...] >> As a side note, also note that the MAC address range definitions are all >> blurred these days, MAC addresses are reused by manufacturers and most >> parsable mean

Re: overriding udev rules

2013-09-09 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 09.09.2013 23:53, schrieb Kay Sievers: >> Hmm, why would upgrades break? > > See [1], there are several cases where 75-persistent-net-generator.rules > doesn't generate a persistent name (mostly VM related). In t