>It would be interesting to change name Debian Multimedia to prevent
> confusion with Debian-Multimedia site[1]?
Piping in as a user, I can say this has caused me a bit of confusion on more
than one occasion. Given that there are versions of the same packages which
are alternately hosted by
> Most of this packages are xmms plugins. Maintainers will need to port
> them to xmms2 or bmpx, or they should be removed.
>
> Other packages just depend on xmms as a mere multimedia player, and
> therefore we recommend the maintainers to adjust their dependencies to
> bmpx, xmms2 or audacious.
>
> Hi
>
> Could you get audacious + audacious-plugins-extra from unstable and tell
> us which formats are supported by xmms but not by audacious ?
>
Is there is a wiki page for this?
Just at a glance, here is what I see. I've pasted the package descriptions for
what I suspect are the most obs
> > Well, my reasoning was, that we just try to wild guess about
> > user capabilities. I have just learned that user behave very
> > unexpected and exactly these users happen to be quite vocal
> > how broken Debian is. I just would like to give them lesser
> > chances to be correct when they cla
What we do to combat that is All patches going into FFmpeg are
> reviewed with security in mind
>
> The codebase was repeatledly tested with fuzzed files to uncover all
> kinds of anomalies, all such found anomalies where fixed. Also
> independant of googles fuzzing efforts, some of our users ha
Can we please keep accessibility for the disabled in mind too?
Unless Debian wants to be completely ableist, Gnome and KDE are the only
two viable options.
I worked in adaptive technology for years training blind users to use
JAWS under windows. I think it's great that similar technology now
6 matches
Mail list logo
