Hi,
> The consensus seems to be that people should enable email notifications in
> salsa and open a bug when filing a merge request.
That's indeed the best way to make the bridge between the BTS and the
merge requests on Salsa.
Note that you can enable the notification programmatically globally
> “My concern is that newcomers will have their merge requests ignored when
> maintainers are not emailed. I see no workable solution as yet, so I’ll have
> to look more into this and come back to this thread when I find one.”
I wonder if we should have a custom integration enabled like we do fo
Hi Ian,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:51 AM Ian Jackson
wrote:
> If people don't like the emails it generates, this should be "fixed"
> by disabling MRs rather than by disabling the email bridge.
>
> Do you know how to write such a thing ? Where would it be
> configured ? (Eg, what if I want to add
Hi guys,
I was reviewing Tobias' updates on the use of dbg packages vs dbgsym
in dev ref and was wondering if there was any other know use cases
where we cannot use dbgsym over dbg packages for building debugging
symbols.
As far as I remember the Python extensions where the ones that were
not wor
Cool, thanks for your answers Matthias and Colin! :)
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 11:07 AM Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 15:00:03 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> [...]
>
> >> that at least a MR is something I should have expected as a package
> >> maintainer, not just commits to master?
> cu And- plan for t
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 6:32 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> It was not my choice to have him spammed by his friends, that was his
> choice when he decided to ignore the emails he admitted to have ignored;
> he could have clicked that button and all he could have seen would have
> been a couple of
>
>
> > However this worries me. During the setup there is no Debian
> involvement, and that means anyone can do the same trick to pretend to own
> my Debian address.
> >
>
That's also a reason why it's better to gpg-sign important email (aside
from the fact that anybody can have a setup that send
Hi guys,
Trying to make sure I understand clearly this long thread here.
Basically you would like to build an architecture equivalent to Ubuntu's
PPA that users could add to their apt sources to get newer versions faster
instead of dealing with their apt preferences?
I personally like the curren
Hi guys,
With one of my package (cmph), when I added debci tests, locally
running autopkgtests using --run-autopkgtests in gbh that uses sbuild,
I have no problem but when it runs on debci, it seems to miss packages
(gcc at fist, now stdlibs, etc) or my local schroot has too many. I
recreate my sc
Hi Nicholas,
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:11 PM Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Have you tried an LXC autopkgtest instance? I've noticed that
> sometimes packages whose tests pass 100% of the time with a schroot
> (buildd profile) will fail on debci, and the only way I've been able
> to reproduce the fa
Hi Bastian,
Full disclaimer: I probably don't contribute often enough inside
Debian to be a reference on it but thinking about it I'm wondering if
it wouldn't be easier to do it another way.
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 8:06 PM Bastian Blank wrote:
> There is "gbp dch", which ignores merge commits (s
Hi,
I'm currently maintaining a few packages and am looking for one or two
DD around Berkeley/Oakland/San Francisco in California that would be
willing to meet in order to sign my gpg key so I can go ahead and
start the DM process.
I haven't seen any Debian event around here to meet more Debian p
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 2:56 PM Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers#US
>
> There are three Debian Developers listed as offering to sign keys in San
> Francisco. That should get you started.
Awesome. Thanks a lot! :)
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 7:43 PM Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'll be at PostgresOpen in San Francisco during the first week of
> September (I'm actually running it, and it's the US Community PostgreSQL
> Conference, run under the United States PostgreSQL Association, and so I
> encourage any
Hi,
I'm having issues sending my updated key to keyring.debian.org:
$ gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-keys
E823DA111E22D7857E1D865863F7800A23D7B252
gpg: sending key 63F7800A23D7B252 to hkp://keyring.debian.org
gpg: keyserver send failed: No keyserver available
gpg: keyserver send failed
Hi,
Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/) and
noticed that it's still referencing alioth for the hosting of VCS
repositories.
I couldn't find in which repo the template for this email was hosted.
Could you point me to the right repo so I can do a MR for this please?
Th
Hi guys,
Wondering if anybody here succeeded to configure your debian email in
the "Send mail as" configuration in gmail (for the gmail users). If so
do you have tips on how you didi it?
My main problem seems to be that gmail forces the authentication and
master.debian.org doesn't allow it. It re
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:10 PM Seth Arnold wrote:
> Two thoughts: first, give it another try. I was able to refresh my
> keyring using the debian keyserver a few seconds ago:
>
> $ gpg --refresh-keys --keyserver keyring.debian.org
> gpg: refreshing 229 keys from hkp://keyring.debian.org
> ..
Hi! :)
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:04 PM Alexandre Viau wrote:
> It looks like you are trying to use Debian smtp servers. I just use
> smtp.gmail.com.
>
> There is a Gmail trick where you can add one send-as email and provide
> smtp.gmail.com credentials.
>
> You might have to create an app password
> I'll add that to the wiki page in case somebody else gets the issue.
FYI: updated https://wiki.debian.org/MigrateToDDAccount with the details.
Not sure if that would be an issue to mention gmail specifically there
as it's vendor-specific. Feel free to remove it if it's a problem.
Joseph
Thank you both for your replies.
I went ahead and pushed a MR:
https://salsa.debian.org/aerostitch/userdir-ldap/merge_requests/1
> Are there discussions about updating welcome email in Debian RT already?
I notified the DSA team on #debian-admin as Mattia was saying in #910057
We'll see the follow
Hi guys,
Sorry I was out yesterday, slammed by work & life! :)
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:19 AM Chris Knadle wrote:
> Which Debian branch of GnuPG is this error happening with?
> (I assume it's Sid/Unstable).
Yes, it's unstable.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:23 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Have you su
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM Simon Quigley wrote:
> Ubuntu has some very detailed Gmail-specific documentation, I would
> recommend that you grab relevant information from that as well:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuEmail
Thanks for the link pretty well explained. I added a note ab
Hi guys,
As announces a while ago in #895462, the asciidoc package which only
support python2 is officially EOL.
Notes:
* The python 2 implementation of asciidoc which, for now, lives at
https://github.com/asciidoc/asciidoc won't receive any new updates
* The python 3 implementation that lives at
Hi guys,
Thanks for you answers.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 5:04 AM Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Why would a user want the old python2 asciidoc ? AFAICT from the
> outside of the program the implementation language is a hidden
> detail.
Haha! I've seen people strictly against the upgrade from python 2 to
26 matches
Mail list logo