Python2 idiosyncrasies in Python3 scripts

2024-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, is there a reliable way to isolate Python2 idiosyncrasies in Python3 scripts ? I guess that I am looking for Python scripts what checkbashisms(1) is for shell scripts. Cheers, Jerone

Re: Python2 idiosyncrasies in Python3 scripts

2024-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Andrey, thanks for your reply. On 15/08/2024 12:56, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 12:11:55PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: is there a reliable way to isolate Python2 idiosyncrasies in Python3 scripts ? Do you mean code that still works in Python 3 but can be

Re: Debian Live Lenny Beta1

2008-08-31 Thread Jerome BENOIT
have just tried the Standard one o my (old) Black MacBook: because of the keyboard freezing issue, I could not start it :-) Cheers, Jerome Regards, Daniel -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Bug#755493: ITP: apophenia -- open source C scientific library for statistical computing

2014-07-21 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: apophenia Version : 0.999 Upstream Author : Ben Klemens * URL : http://apophenia.info/ * License : GPL2 with modifications Programming Lang: C Description : open source C scientific

daemon user naming scheme

2014-08-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, is there for Debian a daemon user naming scheme or custom ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53fb3392.9040...@r

Re: daemon user naming scheme

2014-08-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the prompt reply. On 25/08/14 16:53, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 25/08/14 14:01, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> is there for Debian a daemon user naming scheme or custom ? > > Several :-( > > The ones I've seen suggested are (assuming a package, daemon or user &

Re: daemon user naming scheme

2014-08-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 25/08/14 17:20, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Thanks for the prompt reply. > > On 25/08/14 16:53, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On 25/08/14 14:01, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >>> is there for Debian a daemon user naming scheme or custom ? >> >> Several :-( >> >&

rename source package

2014-09-06 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I filled an ITA for guava [1]. Because it is rather a GAP package then a stand alone software, it would make more sense to rename it gap-guava: how can I rename its source from guava to gap-guava ? Note that the deb ball associated to it is already named gap-guava. Thanks in advance

Bug#762583: ITP: gap-grape -- GRaph Algorithms using PErmutation groups for GAP

2014-09-23 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: gap-grape Version : 4.6.1 Upstream Author : Leonard H. Soicher * URL : http://www.gap-system.org/Packages/grape.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: GAP Description : GRaph

binary data file and endianness and multiarch

2014-09-26 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I am currently refresh the Debian package for sympow [1]. In the README file, we read: The mesh files are stored in binary form, and thus endian-ness is a worry when moving from one platform to another. The executable that generates these data file is a binary exectable (C sourc

Re: binary data file and endianness and multiarch

2014-09-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello All, thanks for your answer. On 27/09/14 23:37, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>> Standardising on big-endian is a good idea [...] > >> Except that the endianness war has been won by little-endian > > That's not what my mail was about. My point is that the issue with the > software should be

Bug#764475: ITP: singular -- commutative algebra system

2014-10-08 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: singular Version : 4.0.1 Upstream Author : SINGULAR Team * URL : http://www.singular.uni-kl.de * License : GPL-2+, GPL-3+, adhoc Programming Lang: C, C++, ... Description

Re: post-jessie: header only C++ library package (static?)

2014-10-19 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 19/10/14 16:07, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:30:17PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Osamu Aoki wrote: >>> This is about packaging around a header only C++ library package. >> IIRC, we already have one in the archive. I vaguely recall it >> from m68k

Bug#767050: ITP: tachyon-doc-extra -- Parallel/Multiprocessor Ray Tracing Software -- extra documents

2014-10-27 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: tachyon-doc-extra Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Jerome Benoit * URL : none * License : Public Domain Programming Lang: raw data Description : Parallel/Multiprocessor Ray Tracing

Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)

2014-11-08 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 08/11/14 19:00, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 06:13:31PM +0100, Javier Barroso wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:56:49PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: The release team is pleased to announce that Debian 8.0 "Jessie" is frozen. >> >>> I thought usually this typ

Re: Jessie Freeze -> What is the next release name? (jessie+1)

2014-11-08 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 08/11/14 21:04, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 07:46:09PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> On 08/11/14 19:00, Adam Borowski wrote: >>> To prevent such problems in the future, what about choosing the names for >>> both zurg and zurg+1? This way, the c

Bug#769997: ITP: 4ti2 -- algebraic, geometric and combinatorial problems on linear spaces

2014-11-17 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: 4ti2 Version : 1.6.2 Upstream Author : 4ti2 team * URL : http://www.4ti2.de/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C, C++, swig Description : algebraic, geometric and combinatorial

Re: gnome is completely f^Mmessed up

2012-06-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: On 09/06/12 19:54, Stephen Allen wrote: On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:26:23PM +0200, Florian Reitmeir wrote: Norbert Preining wrote: is this only me or do I have the feeling that we are going down the trench with Gnome? Repeatedly: - first login: nautilus segfaults in libnautilus-file

Bug#681162: ITP: scscp -- Symbolic Computation Software Composibility Protocol (SCSCP) library

2012-07-10 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: scscp Version : 0.6.4 Upstream Author : Mickael Gastineau * URL : http://www.imcce.fr/trip/scscp * License : (CeCILL-C (close to GNU GPL) or CeCILL v2.0 (compatible with GNU GPL

adopting a recently removed package

2012-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: I would like to adopt a recently removed package: The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more maintainer; but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage. How may I proceed to adopt it ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-deve

Re: adopting a recently removed package

2012-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi: On 16/08/12 00:54, Julián Moreno Patiño wrote: Hi, Just read this: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq I read it before sending my previous email. what is not clear to me is the status of the Package, hence my email: is it orphaned ? is it still maintained ? is it considered as a new

Re: adopting a recently removed package

2012-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi: On 16/08/12 01:12, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I would like to adopt a recently removed package: The package have still a Sid webpage, but accordingly there is no more maintainer; but there is a maintainer in its Squeeze webpage. How may I

Re: adopting a recently removed package

2012-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 16/08/12 01:40, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: libpam-ssh http://packages.debian.org/sid/libpam-ssh The removal information is here: http://bugs.debian.org/650644 In addition to what I mentioned, you should unarchive and reopen any bugs that

Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys

2012-08-15 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: libpam-ssh Version : 1.97 Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer * URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net/ * License : BSD Programming Lang: C Description : Authenticate using SSH keys

Re: adopting a recently removed package

2012-08-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Again: On 16/08/12 02:20, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Is there a simple and efficient way to do so ? Sorry, I do not get how to figure out the ones closed by the removal: can you put it in other words ? When closing bugs, we can mark them as

Re: Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys

2012-08-16 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: On 16/08/12 10:39, Jon Dowland wrote: It would be nice if your initial upload would resolve the multiple issues that were the cause for the package removal, rather than simply reintroduce them. I am totally agree with you, and I am working on it. I guess that you understand that I wante

Re: Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys

2012-08-16 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: On 16/08/12 11:29, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 08/16/2012 09:01 AM, Jerome Benoit wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: libpam-ssh Version : 1.97 Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer * URL : http://pam-ssh.sourceforge.net

Re: Bug#685042: ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys

2012-08-16 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: On 16/08/12 08:40, Neil Williams wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 03:01:33 +0200 Jerome Benoit wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: libpam-ssh Version : 1.97 Upstream Author : Akorty Rosenauer * URL : http://pam

Re: Gnome classic mode

2012-09-12 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 12/09/12 12:16, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 11:03 +0100, Darac Marjal a écrit : Isn't the whole concept of "default desktop" just a matter of "which desktop is included on CD1"? Are you proposing that Debian switches to a series of "CD1s" (Debian Ghome Edition, D

Re: Gnome classic mode

2012-09-12 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 12/09/12 13:38, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 12 septembre 2012 à 12:40 +0200, Jerome BENOIT a écrit : What does it happen when no internet connection is available (no access to internet, no supported driver for the net card) ? This case is certainly as anecdotic as CD1, but somehow

Re: Gnome classic mode

2012-09-12 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi: On 12/09/12 16:36, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote: On 12/09/2012 15:53, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Claiming that ``What is on CD1 is really anecdotic, since most people use (or should use) the netinst'' really sounds as claim of a newbie who has never installed Debian on a computer.

Bug#710296: ITP: maple-latex -- LaTeX packages, environments and macros distributed by Maple

2013-05-29 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: maple-latex Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Waterloo Maple Inc. * URL : http://www.maplesoft.com * License : ad hoc Waterloo Maple Inc. license Programming Lang: TeX/LaTeX Description

Bug#710349: ITP: maple-package -- utility for creating Maple Debian packages

2013-05-29 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: maple-package Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Jerome Benoit * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: bash, make Description : utility for creating Maple Debian packages Maple is a commercial

docbook-xsl: why only one version ?

2013-06-01 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I have to deal with docbook-xsl for one of my package. I am not familiar with docbook-xsl stuff, so my question may sound naive. It appears that the upstream stuff play with docbook-xsl version 1.75.2 , but not 1.76.1 : only the last one is available on Wheezy, so why only one version

Re: docbook-xsl: why only one version ?

2013-06-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Paul, thanks for your reply. On 02/06/13 08:57, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Jerome, > > On 02-06-13 06:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> I have to deal with docbook-xsl for one of my package. >> I am not familiar with docbook-xsl stuff, so my question may sound naive. &

Re: docbook-xsl: why only one version ?

2013-06-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, On 02/06/13 18:54, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Jérome, > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > [...] >> In short, the initial question may be rephrase: >> what there is no `catalog' policy for docbook-xsl on Debian ? > > I believe

DH way to set SONAME

2013-06-08 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, because of backward incompatibility I have to add a suffix to my library package name. But lintian keep noticing the mismatch. I know the the soname of a library can be specify by passing appropriate options to the gcc tools: is a DH way to do so ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To U

Re: DH way to set SONAME

2013-06-08 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thank you both for your quick answer. On 09/06/13 08:29, Chow Loong Jin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:00:39AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> because of backward incompatibility I have to add a suffix to >> my library package name. But lintian

Re: DH way to set SONAME

2013-06-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 09/06/13 12:53, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/06/13 08:00, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> because of backward incompatibility I have to add a suffix to >> my library package name. But lintian keep noticing the mismatch. >> I know the the s

How to bump the SONAME of a library ? [WAS: DH way to set SONAME]

2013-06-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I am not so sure what I must understand by `bump the SONAME': given that libtool machinery is employed, does is mean that `current' must be increased by one ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

setgid bit and TMPDIR

2013-06-30 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I want to pass TMPDIR to an executable with setgid bit: I know that TMPDIR then discarded by glibc; but I also noticed that TMPDIR can be passed provided that the group is forced to be the grout of the executable. Is there other tricks in the same vein ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -

SONAME migration: from liblambda0 to liblambda1

2013-07-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: When the SONAME increments the associated binary library package has a new name, so the SONAME suffix has to increment as well accordingly: for a library package lambda, the binary library package could be renamed from liblambda0 to liblambda1. I thought that I could manage all of the

Bug#723704: ITP: mplapack -- multiple precision arithmetic BLAS and LAPACK

2013-09-18 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: mplapack Version : 0.8.0 Upstream Author : Nakata Maho * URL : http://mplapack.sourceforge.net * License : GPL Programming Lang: C/C++ Description : multiple precision arithmetic

Bug#723839: ITP: mpfrc++ -- C++ wrapper for the GNU MPFR C library

2013-09-20 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: mpfrc++ Version : 2013-09-02 Upstream Author : Pavel Holoborodko * URL : http://www.holoborodko.com/pavel/mpfr * License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : C++ wrapper for

how to deal with DOS eol in C++ header ?

2013-09-26 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I am packaging a C++ wrapper which basically contains a long header file. This header file contains DOS end-of-line: may I clean them before to package it ? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?

2013-10-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, I am packaging a versionless library software maintained via a mercurial repository. Is there any custom for this case ? If not, can we use the version format 'hgMMDD' ? Best regards, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?

2013-10-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi Nik, thanks for your quick reply. On 02/10/13 15:49, Dominik George wrote: > > > Jerome BENOIT schrieb: >> Hello, > >> I am packaging a versionless library software maintained via a >> mercurial repository. >> Is there any custom for this case ? >

Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?

2013-10-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, On 02/10/13 16:05, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > >> What does 'XX' stand for ? > > The short commit hash, as proposed in your initial mail. In my first email, what you read as a commit hash was meant to be the date. To summarise: 0~MMDD should be fine. Thanks, Jerome > >> Y

Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?

2013-10-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello All, I did not expected to initial such a thread: thanks a lot for all the messages On 02/10/13 20:24, David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > >> Wookey (2013-10-02): > >>> It would be good if this 0~ trick >>> was mentioned there too > > Already in the New Maintainers' Guide: > > http://www.debia

Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?

2013-10-04 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, On 04/10/13 13:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2013-10-04 13:40:29 +0200, Dominik George wrote: >> My argument for keeping the VCS hash is to ease identifying the code >> in the package. > > Does it need to be in the version string? > Why not somewhere else? > > The goal of the Version fi

Re: how do deal with versionless mercurial software ?

2013-10-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks ! On 15/10/13 22:32, Benjamin Drung wrote: > On Fr, 2013-10-04 at 13:40 +0200, Dominik George wrote: >> Vincent Lefevre schrieb: >>> Then, do you mean that VCS hashes are sortable? >> >> Of course not. One would have to do something like 0~MMDDnn >> +git in that rare case. >> >> My

Re: Work-needing packages report for Feb 3, 2012

2012-02-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Lists: May I add that there are also packages waiting for a sponsor for uploading ? Cheers, Jerome On 03/02/12 01:26, w...@debian.org wrote: The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the las

Re: Doesn't contain source for waf binary code

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: what is the status of an orphaned package but that is waiting for an sponsor to be uploaded ? Thanks, Jerome On 03/02/12 20:33, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi, as this issue affects quite a few packages, I'd like to bring this up for wider discussion. The issue basically is, that the w

Re: Doesn't contain source for waf binary code

2012-02-07 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Sorry, this message was meant for an other threat. On 07/02/12 17:33, Jerome BENOIT wrote: Hello List: what is the status of an orphaned package but that is waiting for an sponsor to be uploaded ? Thanks, Jerome On 03/02/12 20:33, Michael Biebl wrote: Hi, as this issue affects quite a few

Re: Copyright format 1.0 (developed as DEP-5) now available

2012-02-26 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 26/02/12 19:17, gregor herrmann wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 20:20:16 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: Version 1.0 of the machine-readable format for debian/copyright files (the culmination of the DEP-5 process) has now been published. The canonical URL (and also the URL to use in the Format fiel

Re: Enabling hardened build flags for Wheezy

2012-02-29 Thread Jerome BENOIT
I've written conversion documentation in the Debian Wiki to provide central step-by-step documentation: http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough In this wiki, we read: ``If you upgrade to compat level 9'' How can we safely upgrade from 8 to 9 ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSC

Re: Enabling hardened build flags for Wheezy

2012-02-29 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 01/03/12 03:09, Jerome BENOIT wrote: I've written conversion documentation in the Debian Wiki to provide central step-by-step documentation: http://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough In this wiki, we read: ``If you upgrade to compat level 9'' How can we safely upgr

Re: EFI support is not ready

2012-10-19 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: grub support for EFI is clearly a WIP: you may specify the grub version and test with a recent one, On 19/10/12 19:42, HacKurx wrote: Hi, I tested with 2 pc efi and the first gives me a kernel panic during the launch of the second installation when it crashes to the installation of gru

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2012-10-30)

2012-10-30 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, does it make sense to establish a list of candidates for reintroduction to testing ? I have in mind packages that were discarded too quickly because an easy to fix a RC appeared a some point while it was unofficially orphaned. Jerome On 30/10/12 14:32, Niels Thykier wrote: -B

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2012-10-30)

2012-10-30 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 30/10/12 17:36, Jon Dowland wrote: On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:53:24PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: does it make sense to establish a list of candidates for reintroduction to testing ? Is this not something best managed on a case-by-case basis? my experience as potential sponsoree for

Re: Candidates for removal from testing (2012-11-14)

2012-11-14 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 15/11/12 04:20, Paul Wise wrote: On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Niels Thykier wrote: We are considering removing the following packages from testing as they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be found in the attached dd-list. ... Alexander Wirt ferm Um, DSA

Bug#702945: ITP: sanewall -- Easy to use but powerful iptables stateful firewall

2013-03-13 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: sanewall Version : 0.9.5 Upstream Author : Phil Whineray * URL : http://www.sanewall.org * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: bash Description : Easy to use but powerful iptables

reportbug outside the reporbug channel

2013-05-05 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I have just get a bug report for one of my packages via a the direct channel: the report bug was directly sent to me: I politely replied and I forwarded to the mainstream maintainer. May I, and how, forward it to the reportbug debian machinery to share it ? Thanks in advance, Jerome

Bug#729221: ITP: 3dldf -- three-dimensional drawing with MetaPost output

2013-11-10 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: 3dldf Version : 2.0 Upstream Author : Laurence D. Finston * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/3dldf * License : GPL3+ Programming Lang: CWeb, C++ Description : three-dimensional

any news about Alioth ?

2013-11-18 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, is there any schedule about Alioth come back ? Thanks, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5289d9e5.40...@rezozer.net

best way upgrade optimization in dh debian/rules

2013-11-23 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, what is the best way to upgrade the optimization option in dh debian/rules file ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.

privacy-breach-google-adsense: how to get rid of it ?

2013-12-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, is there a proper way to get rid of the recent privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ? Thnaks inadvance, Jerome [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/privacy-breach-google-adsense.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: privacy-breach-google-adsense: how to get rid of it ?

2013-12-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, On 25/12/13 22:04, Dominik George wrote: > Hi, > >> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent >> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ? > > obviously, remove all Adsense and related spyware fetching code from > your package. Obviously, but the problem is tha

Re: privacy-breach-google-adsense: how to get rid of it ?

2013-12-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the hints and the scripts. I am on my way to update my package. On 25/12/13 22:46, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jerome BENOIT >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> &

Re: privacy-breach-google-adsense: how to get rid of it ?

2013-12-25 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, On 26/12/13 00:26, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> is there a proper way to get rid of the recent >> privacy-breach-google-adsense Lintian violation/error report [1] ? > > Same as with every issue in upstream code, r

Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of my predecessor. Meanwhile, kfreebsd support emerged. As FireHOL is meant to manage iptables, it is de facto meant for linux: http://qa.debian.org/de

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, thanks for the reply. On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, > >> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically >> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2013-12-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Again, On 27/12/13 21:17, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:02:49PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> thanks for the reply. > >> On 27/12/13 20:45, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 07:53:32PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: &g

Re: Architecture: all versus linux-any

2014-01-02 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, On 02/01/14 19:57, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jerome BENOIT , 2013-12-27, 21:02: >>>> I am maintaining a package, FireHOL not to name it, which basically >>>> contains bash sources. So it Architecture was set up to all by one of my >>>> predecess

Bug#734316: ITP: gap-float -- multi-precision floating-point computation for GAP

2014-01-05 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: gap-float Version : 0.5.16 Upstream Author : Laurent Bartholdi * URL : http://www.gap-system.org/Packages/float.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: GAP, C, C++ Description

Bug#734418: ITP: gap-io -- low level C library IO bindings for GAP

2014-01-06 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: gap-io Version : 4.2 Upstream Author : Max Neunhoeffer * URL : http://www-circa.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~neunhoef/Computer/Software/Gap/io.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: C, GAP

Bug#737696: ITP: mpria -- multi-precision rational interval arithmetic library

2014-02-04 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: mpria Upstream Author : Jerome Benoit * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/mpria/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : multi-precision rational interval arithmetic library GNU

Bug#738008: ITP: gap-openmath -- OpenMath phrasebook for GAP

2014-02-07 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: gap-openmath Version : 11.2.0 Upstream Author : Alexander Konovalov * URL : http://www.gap-system.org/Packages/openmath.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: GAP Description

Bug#738011: ITP: gap-scscp -- SCSCP protocol in GAP

2014-02-07 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: gap-scscp Version : 2.1.4 Upstream Author : Alexander Konovalov Steve Linton * URL : http://www.gap-system.org/Packages/scscp.html * License : GPL Programming

OpenRC for Jessie ?

2014-02-13 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, I have jsut noticed that OpenRC is in expimental: will it be ready for Jessie ? Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52fc90a8.9060...@r

repacked source ball upgrade

2014-02-28 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, for some of my packages, I would like to update the repacking of the upstream source ball: what is the versionning debian custom ? Let assume the following name: pi_3.14+ds.orig.tar.xz May I name the upgrade version something as pi_3.14+ds1.orig.tar.xz ? Thanks in advance, best regards,

is sarovar.org dead ?

2014-04-14 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: Today I realised that sarovar.org cannot be reached: is it temporary ? is it definitely dead ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https:/

Re: is sarovar.org dead ?

2014-04-14 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks for the confirmation, Jerome On 14/04/14 16:19, Pirate Praveen wrote: > 2014-04-14 19:26 GMT+05:30, Jerome BENOIT : >> Hello List: >> >> Today I realised that sarovar.org cannot be reached: >> is it temporary ? is it definitely dead ? > > unfortunately,

Re: Bug#746158: RFH: csv2latex -- a CSV to LaTeX file converter

2014-04-27 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Benoit, On 27/04/14 15:49, Benoît Rouits wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I request assistance with maintaining the csv2latex package. > > Due to insufficient rights for uploading csv2latex to > ftp-master i would like a kind mentor to review and > eventually upload csv2late

position independent executable issue

2014-05-14 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, for one of the Debian package that I maintained, bibtool to name it, it appears that the added option -pie (aka --pic-executable) caused some issue: #747519 While the upstream source is not subject to the reported bug, adding the hardening options renders the upstream source subject

Re: position independent executable issue

2014-05-14 Thread Jerome BENOIT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Andrey, thanks for your reply. On 14/05/14 19:51, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:12:09PM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> for one of the Debian package that I maintained, bibt

Bug#749466: ITP: 3dldf-doc -- 3D drawing with MetaPost output -- documentation

2014-05-27 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: 3dldf-doc Version : 2.0.3 Upstream Author : Laurence D. Finston * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/3dldf * License : GFDL Programming Lang: TeXinfo Description : 3D drawing with

Bug#776019: ITP: normaliz -- math tool for computations in affine monoids, and rational polytopes and cones

2015-01-22 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: normaliz Version : 2.12.2 Upstream Author : Winfried Bruns, Bogdan Ichim, Tim R\"omer and Christof S\"oger * URL : http://www.home.uni-osnabrueck.de/wbruns/normaliz/ * License

Bug#777132: ITP: surf-alggeo -- tool to visualize some real algebraic geometry

2015-02-05 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jerome Benoit * Package name: surf-alggeo Version : 1.0.6 Upstream Author : Stephan Endrass * URL : http://surf.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C, C++ Description : tool to visualize some

manual in sgml

2015-03-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, the manual of my package is written in SGML language. I guess that it may be translate into a more readable format: What is the best Debian way to convert it in HTML and/or PDF (via LaTeX) ? Thanks in advance, Jerome -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: manual in sgml

2015-03-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hi, it appears that it is LinuxDoc document: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/x277.html Sorry for the noise, Jerome On 09/03/15 20:17, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello List, > > the manual of my package is written in SGML language. > I guess that it may be translate

Re: manual in sgml

2015-03-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Riley, thanks for your prompt reply. Meanwhile I realized that it is a linuxdoc document: what I need can be found in the following page: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/x277.html On 09/03/15 20:49, Riley Baird wrote: >> the manual of my package is written in SGML language. >

Re: manual in sgml

2015-03-09 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 09/03/15 21:00, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello Riley, thanks for your prompt reply. > > Meanwhile I realized that it is a linuxdoc document: > what I need can be found in the following page: > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/sgml-howto/x277.html which contains ob

Re: manual in sgml

2015-03-12 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Osamu, thanks for the hint: I have just midified accordingly the `debian/control' file. On 10/03/15 16:40, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> the manual of my package is writ

automake : include

2015-04-03 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List, does anyone have in mind a working sample for the automake include feature [1] ? Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Include.html#Include -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: automake : include

2015-04-03 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Thanks, On 03/04/15 18:30, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Quoting Jerome BENOIT (2015-04-03 17:57:38) >> does anyone have in mind a working sample for the automake include >> feature [1] ? I have particularly in mind the %reldir% and %canon_reldir% feature . Jerome > &g

Re: automake : include

2015-04-03 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 03/04/15 20:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Jerome BENOIT (2015-04-03): >> Hello List, >> >> does anyone have in mind a working sample for the automake include feature >> [1] ? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Jerome >> >> [1] >> http

UsrMerge: building issue

2018-11-13 Thread Jerome BENOIT
non-usr-merg-ed environment at build time when we build from source ? Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B

Is PyPi down ?

2019-01-12 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello, apparently https://pypi.debian.net/ is down ? When will it come back ? Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

pbuilder: create: how to set specific UID for some system user (e.g., _apt)

2019-04-13 Thread Jerome BENOIT
advance, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   >