-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hi,
I hope this is the right mailinglist for this.
I always had the problem, that if I removed a package via apt-get
remove, that there were still other packages that only were installed
because of that package.
I wrote a little perl-script:
N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Michal Čihař wrote:
> deborphan looks simmilar to what you describe.
yeah, similar, also it finds only the leaves, while apt-findremovable
checks which depends have no other rdepends than the specified one
> Anyway if you use
> aptitude instead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Some of us are partial to apt-get and would appreciate
> apt-findremovable.
cool :)
I just released v0.2:
http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
.. it's getting slower (takes about 1min to complete),
but now it re-checks, if apt-cache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> have fun trying it.
>
> Thanks. Is a single perl script worth packaging, though?
since v0.4 its even seems to be working correctly :)
http://prevalent-digest.de/apt-findremovable/
I guess that's also the final version (a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> aptitude has this
> apt has that
> aptitude can't do that
> apt can't do this
> [...]
.. is this always here like this?
Isn't it just that some prefer apt and some aptitude, and that of course
those that prefer aptitude think that apt-findremo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Brian May wrote:
>>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kechel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Jan> I wrote a little perl-script:
>
> How does this compare with deborphan?
>
deborphan show
Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Ever tried the simulate button in the orphaner frontend? I don't know
> apt-findremovable's UI but I very much like orphaner's. But then I
> might be just slightly biased. :)
don't care about apt-findremovable anymore, debfoster does it's job much
better :)
> Peter
Jan
7 matches
Mail list logo
