Bug#348625: ITP: puppet -- centralised configuration management for networks

2006-01-17 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: puppet Version : 0.11.1 Upstream Author : Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/ * License : GPL

Bug#304270: ITP: libfishsound -- simple programming interface that wraps Xiph.Org audio codecs

2005-04-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libfishsound Version : 0.6.3 Upstream Author : Conrad Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Silvia Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Zentar

Bug#364976: ITP: facter -- a library for retrieving facts from operating systems

2006-04-26 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: facter Version : 1.1.4 Upstream Author : Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://reductivelabs.com/projects/facter * License : GPL Programmin

Re: Very uneven distribution of packages per maintainer

2003-05-25 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >Packages Developers Looks like a normal distribution curve in gnuplot. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq

Re: Debian Weekly News - June 3rd, 2003

2003-06-04 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Martin Schulze wrote: >Flaming with Jamie Zawinski. Slow news day, Joey? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq

Re: package name change (moviemate -> mediamate)

2003-07-31 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: >you should Conflict, Replace, and provide MovieMate. This will ensure a >smooth transition. You instead (may) want to upload a package called >moviemate which is a dummy package that depends on MediaMate. You should do both, with the Con

Re: Searching for Angus Lees

2003-08-19 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Colin Walters wrote: >If someone here knows an alternate email address for Angus, could you >resend this message there? Thanks. Done. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.debian.org/~jaq

Re: configure web proxy via DHCP server

2003-08-30 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker wrote: >The ideal solution however would be an addition to the DHCP standard for a >field to specify this information. My solution only works AFTER I have >figured out the correct data for each network by some other means and >customised my script. SR

Re: "non-free" software included in contrib

2003-09-01 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Bruce Sass wrote: >Exactly. What if a generalised DFSG-free software installer used a >separate config file to download, debianize (using dh_make templates), >then install the resulting package (most of it non-free because such a >scheme should not be necessary for fre

Re: Bug#324179: ITP: quake3 -- a famous first person shooter by ID-Software

2005-09-07 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Hi! I only just found this ITP; I've been working on a debian/ dir for icculus.org's quake3 branch for a few weeks. Also in the pipeline is a quake3-data that doesn't suck as much as quake2-data... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact

Bug#609625: ITP: nsscache -- asynchronously synchronise local NSS databases with remote directory services

2011-01-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson * Package name: nsscache Version : 0.19 Upstream Author : Jamie Wilkinson * URL : http://code.google.com/p/nsscache * License : GPL Programming Lang: Python Description : asynchronously

Bug#609626: ITP: libnss-cache -- NSS module for using local cache files as a naming service

2011-01-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson * Package name: libnss-cache Version : 0.10 Upstream Author : Jamie Wilkinson * URL : http://code.google.com/p/nsscache * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : NSS module for using

Re: status of Progeny projects

2003-11-04 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Ian Murdock wrote: >We have ported Red Hat's Anaconda installer to Debian; This rocks. I have an extensive PXE+kickstart based server build system at work and I was considering hacking d-i to read a kickstart configuration file, this looks like it's saved me the troub

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Eduard Bloch wrote: >The fact of the too generic package name was mentioned before within >other arguments against your "linux" package. IIRC you prefered not to >answer to it but refered to an URL which did not contain the answers. 'linux' is a perfect name for the pa

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Eduard Bloch wrote: >You repeat this again and again and got answers from me and others to >such an ultimate argument. But did you ask yourself why Herbert does not >participiate this discussion to help you? Why does the lack of response from Herbert prove that this pa

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Garrett wrote: >Robert Millan wrote: > >>But someone claimed there are critical problems with System.map in the way >>my package is upgraded, which is not the case. > >If I get a new linux package after doing apt-get ugprade which replaces >the one for my runnin

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > > * A package which requires a reboot on updates > > > > Oh, now I'm suposed to fix that, too? Bitch upstream for a run-time > > updatable Linux kernel. > > ROTFL > > That's not the point, I thought that was obvious, sorry. The point

Re: create new Debian-Kernel project (was: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel)

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Eduard Bloch wrote: >#include >* Jamie Wilkinson [Mon, Nov 10 2003, 06:54:22PM]: > >> >The fact of the too generic package name was mentioned before within >> >other arguments against your "linux" package. IIRC you prefered not

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, A.J. Rossini wrote: >Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This one time, at band camp, Eduard Bloch wrote: >>>You repeat this again and again and got answers from me and others to >>>such an ultimate argument. But did y

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Andrew Suffield wrote: >On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:58:46AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:43:49PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: >> > > 1) You said before you were concerned about my package occupiing the >> > > package >> > > namespace in the ar

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Garrett wrote: >Robert Millan wrote: >>On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:33:00PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: >>> klogd will be unable to look up symbols, and ps and top need it for >>> wchan to be displayable. >> >>I'm so scared. wchan won't be displayable! > >What w

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan wrote: > Place the package files in /usr/lib, and copy them conditionaly (debconf) > into /boot. The debconf question would properly explain that if per chooses > to update it, then the system must be rebooted promptly. > >Another option: > > Place the

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Matthew Garrett wrote: >Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > >>I do not expect Robert's package to make any more of an attempt to convince >>you a reboot is required than any of the other kernel packages. > >The current kernel packages include the

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > > How do the current kernel packages guarantee this? > > > > Why would Robert's package need to behave any differently? > > The current kernel packages don't make the old stuff just dissappear, > so it's less of an issue in that case. In f

Re: Bug#219582: ITP: linux -- Linux 2.4 kernel

2003-11-11 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Robert Millan wrote: >> being presented with. > >I'd really LOVE to. But this is my discussion. If I don't take part in it, >who will respond to all these bogus arguments some people enjoy sending in? > >Rather, this is you and the other trolls who are wasting my time.

Re: GCC 3.2 transition

2002-08-17 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Joseph Carter wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/j2sdk1.4.0_01/jre/plugin/i386/ns610$ ldd >libjavaplugin_oji.so > libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40044000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x4008e000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libd

Re: RFC: A regression test framework for Debian packages?

2002-09-02 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jérôme Marant wrote: > In a chrooted environment, we can install deboostrap and > package dependencies through APT. About 6 months ago I started writing some code in expect to do just this, to test my quake2-data installer package. I was able to install the package

Re: RFC: A regression test framework for Debian packages?

2002-09-02 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jérôme Marant wrote: >On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:19:23PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: >> This one time, at band camp, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> > In a chrooted environment, we can install deboostrap and >> > package dependencies through APT

Re: web browser bookmark defaults

2002-11-21 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Mark Howard wrote: >I also vote for removing any other upstream bookmarks (e.g. rpm search, >slackware searches). Feel free to disagree, with a convincing argument. I use a Debian workstation, but admin a collection of Debian and Red Hat machines -- remove the rpm sear

Bug#170484: ITP: chaksem -- a LaTeX class for presentations

2002-11-23 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Version: unavailable; reported 2002-11-24 Severity: wishlist * Package name: chaksem Version : 1.6a Upstream Author : Manuel M. T. Chakravarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~chak/presentation/presentation.html * License :

Re: Multiple conflicts between firewall configuring packages (policy change? mass bug filing?)

2002-11-27 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: >He can either: >1.- get the rules of the latest firewall script that runs from init (if it >flushes the previous rules) >2.- get a mixed setup of rules. > >¿Shouldn't there be a way for these firewalls to cooperate so as to not >ge

Re: ifupdown writes to /etc... a bug?

2003-04-24 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hood wrote: >On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 18:56, Steve Langasek wrote: >> The FHS is about more than just providing a system that technically >> allows you to mount different filesystems as needed. There are also >> aesthetic concerns in the heirarchy (in the broad sen

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Blars Blarson wrote: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >>I won't debate whether this is true in general, bug it is certainly >>unnecessary in the case of pump. I have specifically added code to >>deal with the inability to write to /var/run by

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri wrote: >On Apr 07, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Duh. Did you miss the part where people were talking about *amending the > >FHS because the FHS is flawed*? >Yes: I did not agree with them. >And looks like I was right, because as I showed

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri wrote: >On Apr 07, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > * pam, shadow > > Allow either /etc/nologin or /run/nologin to prevent non-root logins >Use a symlink. > > > * util-linux > > Use /run/mtab for mount's statefile >Use a symlink. A

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hood wrote: >On Sat, 2003-04-12 at 10:12, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: >> On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 14:17, Thomas Hood wrote: >> > * ppp >> > * Change /usr/sbin/pppd to: >> > * Store PID in /run/, not in /var/run/ >> Why? Is the goal to make PPP-mounter /var

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hood wrote: >(Re: /etc/nologin) >> A dangling symlink should be considered like a missing file. > >Yes, that would work. However, having separate /etc/nologin >and /run/nologin looks like a useful feature, as I mentioned >earlier. For clarification, (and this i

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: >On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 14:17, Thomas Hood wrote: >> The proposed new directory is for files similar to those in /var/run/ >> that are not just variable and unshareable but also local -- i.e., they >> must be writable independently of network co

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hood wrote: > * base-files > Add /run/ directory #191036: create /run for programs that run before /var is mounted > * pam, shadow > Allow either /etc/nologin or /run/nologin to prevent nonroot login #191037: Allow both /etc/nologin and /run/nolo

Re: /run/, resolvconf and read-only root

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Sam Hartman wrote: >Until you get general consensus on a specific goal, I'm unlikely to >accept such changes if they are submitted to me. As a maintainer I >want to be able to look at some statement and answer the following >questions: Hi Sam, I've just filed the bug

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri wrote: > >/etc has a "static nature". See the note on /etc/mtab under Table > >3.7.3.1. It is also for configuration files. /etc/adjtime is neither. >Then propose to change FHS. Welcome to the discussion. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Marco d'Itri wrote: >On Apr 07, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >(I forgot to mention) J.W.'s patch does more than what a mere symlink > >would do. By making programs sensitive both to /run/nologin and > >/etc/nologin, it becomes possible for the administra

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Thomas Hood wrote: >Jamie Wilkinson wrote: >> That is right! The core of the matter is not whether >> filesystems need to be mounted over the network or not, >> but whether the parts of the filesystem you are attempting >> to write to are on

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek wrote: >Shell pseudocode was posted to this thread (a month ago?) that showed >how the init scripts could handle the requirement that /run be mounted >early, even if it's not on the root fs. The init scripts already >include special handling of /proc and

Re: /run and read-only /etc

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Sorry to reopen this at such a late date, but I'm way behind on -devel. > >"Hi, I'm Karl and I maintain login and passwd." > >Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * pam, shadow >> Allow either /etc/nologin or /run/nologin to preve

Re: /run/, resolvconf and read-only root

2003-04-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >... and those who have tried to explain why it's a bad idea or have >concerns have been brushed off. So I've given up for now trying to >explain to you folks why I'm not convinced, since I don't have time to >go pig mud-wrestling, but please don't

Re: /run/, resolvconf and read-only root

2003-04-29 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: >This one time, at band camp, Theodore Ts'o wrote: >>... and those who have tried to explain why it's a bad idea or have >>concerns have been brushed off. So I've given up for now trying to >>explain to you

Re: Quake 2 sources GPL'd

2001-12-22 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess wrote: >That's neat, but I wish we at least had quake 1 in contrib for woody. >Woody will be the first release of debian in years and years without the >possbility of quake at all (in main, contrib, or even non-free), I think. (I'm not yet a d-d, I'm currentl

Re: Quake2/GPL: At least source should go into main

2001-12-22 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Erich Schubert wrote: >Software in contrib needs non-free software to run. >But the source of quake2 certainly is useful without the commercial game >data. This is a silly assertion; the source to *any* program is useful without the data files. As others have pointed

Re: Quake2/GPL: At least source should go into main

2001-12-24 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Erich Schubert wrote: >> I wonder how many people in either of these threads have actually downloaded >> this source and looked at it? > >i have. I even got it to compile... >and i think it'll need quite some work to get useful... >it has inline asm gcc doesn't like; th

Bug#126716: ITP: quake2 -- popular 3D first person shooter game (engine only)

2001-12-28 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-28 Severity: wishlist * Package name: quake2 Version : 3.21 Upstream Author : iD Software (unmaintained) * URL : ftp://ftp.idsoftware.com/idstuff/source/q2source-3.21.zip * License : GPL Version 2 Description :

Re: BUG: Quake2 and mailcap file (mime-support)

2002-01-09 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Pete Ryland wrote: >So is this a bug with mime-support (shouldn't have blown away mailcap when >/tmp was full), quake2-data (shouldn't have filled /tmp in the first place), >both, or should I have been monitoring /tmp and it's really my own silly >fault? (100M is surely

Re: SUGGESTION: Re: Some thoughts about problems within Debian

2002-01-10 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >Ahh it already exists! Cool. Well then it is a bug on the www pages. >Missing here ... >http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities It was at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#tags when I looked today... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debbugs and ACK messages

2002-04-03 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Wichert Akkerman wrote: >Previously Colin Walters wrote: >> This gets tricky though, because right now the BTS isn't designed to >> do stuff depending on the submitter at all... > >It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers. And that flag is? -- [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Debbugs and ACK messages

2002-04-04 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Colin Walters wrote: >On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 17:44, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > >> It's simple, just stick a flag in the mail headers. > >I don't really regard that as a reasonable solution. For example, my >email client doesn't (as far as I know) allow adding arbitrary h

Re: Debian Conference 2 Registration

2002-04-07 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: >IMHO the non-free section should be removed. IMHO you should write less email and fix more bugs. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg Commander Taco wastes our time with these dumb polls but we keep r

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free =?iso-8859-15?q?software in?= main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >DFSG stand for "Debian Free Software Guidelines". IMHO we ave to create a >DFDG, "Debian Free Documentation Guidelines". I wrote this up last night after getting fed up with this thread, then modified it this morning after reading the thread on

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free =?iso-8859-15?q?software in?= main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: >I wrote this up last night after getting fed up with this thread, then >modified it this morning after reading the thread on -legal that was >referred to. Flame away. > >http://people.debian.org/~jaq/jfdl.html Of course

Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free =?iso-8859-15?q?software in?= main)

2002-04-08 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Ola Lundqvist wrote: >On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 03:57:42PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: >> http://people.debian.org/~jaq/jfdg.html > >Well written. Thanks. > >One issue though: >The license may not require a royalty or

Re: The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and /usr/share/common-licenses

2002-04-08 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Dale Scheetz wrote: >So, in fact, both of these licenses are non-free, as they contain clauses >that can be used, and will be considered non-free. > >I find it ... foolish to declare a license to be free IFF some clauses of >the license are not exercised. Using this lan

Re: Bug #140769: frozen-bubble: RC bug

2002-04-14 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Rob Bradford wrote: >Package: frozen-bubble >Version: 0.9.2-9 >Severity: critical > >Frozen-bubble is holding up the release process as all the developers >are now hooked and are no longer working on woody, hence the RC status >as this package is single handedly holding

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-15 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Lasse Karkkainen wrote: >Time to throw some gasoline on the flames ... Branden apparently is >incapable of releasing it. So, I suggest that anyone, with enough >knowledge and TIME, reading this, would volunteer as XFree package >maintainer. Branden's comments suggest

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-17 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, David D. W. Downey wrote: >No apologies needed, we all know it's his evil twin. *evil* twin? Now I'm scared. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg Marge, this ticket doesn't just give me a seat. It also gives me the right -

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-17 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Joseph Carter wrote: >On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:25:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: >> I didn't go anywhere. Nowhere in my platform did I claim I wasn't evil. >> ;-) > > this is the New Overfiend, preacher of Love and Tolerance Orwellian Love and Tolerance, that i

Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?

2002-04-19 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
This one time, at band camp, Branden Robinson wrote: >Over six months ago, on 2001-11-14, Bug #119517 was submitted to the >Technical Committee for a ruling. No member of the Technical Committe >has participated in any public discussion of this bug (at least in the >bug logs or in available messag

Bug#634124: ITP: cronutils -- Utilities to assist running batch processing jobs

2011-07-17 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson * Package name: cronutils Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Jamie IWlkinson * URL : http://code.google.com/p/cronutils/ * License : Apache Programming Lang: C Description : Utilities to assist

Bug#946014: ITP: pyao -- Python interface to the Audio Output library

2019-12-02 Thread Jamie Wilkinson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Jamie Wilkinson * Package name: pyao Version : 0.82 Upstream Author : Christian Schmitz * URL : http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/download/ * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: C Description : Python interface to