On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> as you may know, Debian 10 buster includes the iptables-nft utility by
> default,
> which is an iptables flavor that uses the nf_tables kernel subsystem.
> Is intended to help people migrate from iptables to nftables.
>
> For t
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > 2) introduce firewalld as the default firewalling wrapper in Debian, at
> > least in
> > desktop related tasksel tasks.
>
> No objection. I think it's high time we have some default firewall
> installed in particular with IPv6 getting more widely d
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Di, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:23:43 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 11:07:15 +0200, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> > > as you may know, Debian 10 buster includes the iptables-nft utility by
> > > default, which is an iptables flavor t
On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 11:57 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> [...]
> > The other desktop firewall that I know is "ufw" but it doesn't seem to
> > have any momentum behind it.
>
> Also, while its syntax is obviously intended to be simple, it's quite
> irr
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > The other desktop firewall that I know is "ufw" but it doesn't seem to
> > have any momentum behind it.
>
> It is curious you mention a lack of momentum; in my experience, it is
> the most commonly recommended firewall on vari
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > > 2) introduce firewalld as the default firewalling wrapper in Debian, at
> > > least in
> > > desktop related tasksel tasks.
> >
> > No objection
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>
> > Again, I'm biased, but ufw supports IPv6. It's also been on the default
> > server
> > and desktop install of Ubuntu for 9+ years. ufw functions well for bastion
> > hosts, less so
7 matches
Mail list logo
