Re: removing unmaintained (unused?) X input drivers

2009-03-18 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 21:51 +0900, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > the following X input drivers will be removed from the archive soon > > unless someone steps up to maintain them (both upstream and in Debian). > > If you use one of these, now is th

Re: One-time cron output?

2009-04-18 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 23:50 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 11:28 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > > I wanted to gather some opinions on this matter. I’ve recently applied > > to the mlocate package a patch I received to skip running the daily > > update of the databas

Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s

2009-04-27 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:48 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > Hi > > Dne Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:39:15 +0100 > Noah Slater napsal(a): > > > * The Debian lists are the only lists I have ever come across that > > mandate, or > > even care, about such a thing. I have been on many lists in my time, >

Re: Ideas for user-visible changes in Squeeze?

2009-04-27 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 18:08 +1200, Francois Marier wrote: > I created a page to collect ideas on new user-visible changes that could be > rolled into Squeeze. > Please put your thoughts on the wiki: > > http://wiki.debian.org/UserVisibleChangesInSqueeze > > Who knows, some of these could even

Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s (Re: Can we ship sources of a PDF file in the Debian diff?

2009-04-28 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:07 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Bjørn Mork writes: > > > I don't know, but there are plenty of reasons to choose from. See e.g. > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > A stronger, and simpler, case is made by > http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply

Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s (Re: Can we ship sources of a PDF file in the Debian diff?

2009-04-28 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 07:46 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > + Frank Lin PIAT (Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:54:07 +0200): > > > If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list: > [...] > > > If the sender of the previous mail was NOT subscribed to the list. > [...

Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s (Re: Can we ship sources of a PDF file in the Debian diff?

2009-04-28 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:12 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Frank Lin PIAT writes: > > > If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list: > > If I select "Reply": > > To=mailing-list > > CC= > > If I select "Reply t

Re: ignoring the CoC in regards to cc:s (Re: Can we ship sources of a PDF file in the Debian diff?

2009-04-28 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:20 +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:54:07PM +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > If the sender of the previous email is subscribed to the list: > > If I select "Reply": > > To=mailing-list > > CC= > >

Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem? [386 support]

2009-05-05 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 17:41 +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > I have been told by upstream maintainers of one of my packages and by > > prominent developers of other distributions that supporting a standalone > > /usr is too much work and no

Re: deprecating /usr as a standalone filesystem? [/usr on NFS]

2009-05-05 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 16:25 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > > > Yes, the most repeated argument has been mount /usr via NFS. > > Unfortunately, nobody yet explained how do they update the resulting > > cluster of machines. > > It's not particularly difficult. You updat

Re: Possible mass bug filing: non-doc packages recommending doc packages

2009-05-08 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 17:55 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote: > > I filed a lintian wishlist bug (#527363) requesting a I/W tag when non > documentation packages recommend documentation packages. While I support the effort to reduce disk space usage, I strongly disagree with this proposal. A s

Re: Possible mass bug filing: non-doc packages recommending doc packages

2009-05-11 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Travis Crump wrote: > Daniel Burrows wrote: >> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:58:56PM -0700, Russ Allbery >> was heard to say: I think that lintian warning is the right way to do it. >>> I don't -- I think there are too many false positives for a lintian >>> warning given the thread. I also thin

Re: Bug#529624: netbase: networking should not be stopped on reboot or halt

2009-05-20 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 01:18 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <20090520155616.ga29...@bongo.bofh.it> you wrote: > > Does anybody see any downsides to this? > > It does not make sense to me. the network will be stopped after the daemon > if the daemon is confgured with correct depe

Bug#530253: Compressed svg should be named .svgz (not .svg.gz)

2009-05-23 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Package: debhelper Version: 7.2.8 Severity: normal Hello, According to SVG specifications[1] and freedesktop's mime database[2], the compressed .svg files should be named *.svgz (not .svg.gz) Files that are named *.svg.gz are identified as application/x-gzip instead of image/svg+xml-compressed.

Re: Who uses @packages.d.o mail?

2009-05-23 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Stephen Gran wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said: >> The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to >> keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews >> and the subsequent translations. > > This one time, at band camp, Adeodato

Re: Bug#530253: Compressing pdf

2009-05-23 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > According to SVG specifications[1] and freedesktop's mime database[2], > the compressed .svg files should be named *.svgz (not .svg.gz) BTW, compressed PDF (.pdf.gz) are perfectly handled by mime, nautilus and evince (file association works perfectly,

Re: no deprecation of /usr as a standalone filesystem

2009-06-01 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 19:51 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Josselin Mouette writes: > > > Le dimanche 31 mai 2009 à 19:43 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > > > All things considered, I have no immediate plan to push for > > > deprecating a standalone /usr. > > > > Thanks for going back. > > Seconded.

Statistics for licenses?

2009-06-04 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, I am preparing a document to advocate further use of open-source software in my organization. I am looking for some statistics of the [main] licenses used in Debian packages (or some statistics about the license used in open-source software at large). Are you aware of such analyze? Thank

Re: Statistics for licenses?

2009-06-09 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 09:10 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > I am looking for some statistics of the [main] licenses used in Debian > packages (or some statistics about the license used in open-source > software at large). > > Are you aware of such analyze? FWIW,

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

2009-06-13 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:02 +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:56:25PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > Josselin Mouette writes: > > > > > Unless you are volunteering to write and maintain these files for our > > > large source packages, for which maintainers have already explained

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

2009-06-13 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 23:39 +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > > What I now would put in debian/copyright is: > > Copyright (C) 2006-2008 Person A > > Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Person B > > It depends what you hope to achieve by adding t

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

2009-06-13 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 21:11 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 07:56:09PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > Josselin Mouette writes: > > > > That doesn’t hold. Most of my copyright files are much easier to read > > >

Re: Let’s turn DEP5 into something useful

2009-06-13 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Sat, 2009-06-13 at 09:17 +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:52:36AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > > The real problem with DEP5 is not the format (which is not worse for a > > small package than the current one), it is with the unrealistic amount > > of information th

Re: apt-get wrapper for maintaining Partial Mirrors

2009-06-18 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 16:16 -0500, Joseph Rawson wrote: > On Tuesday 09 June 2009 13:14:53 sanket agarwal wrote: > > I had an idea in mind whereby the task of making mirrors for personal > > distributions can be automated. Depending on what you want to achieve, a caching proxy might be an easy so

Re: Switching the default /bin/sh to dash

2009-06-24 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 06:47 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Donnerstag 25 Juni 2009 05:21:45 schrieb Raphael Geissert: > > I just noticed I forgot to say something: (BTW, scripts not only loads faster under dash, they also run faster in Dash.) > > > What won't change: > > > * Bash will still b

Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-10-29 Thread Frank lin Piat
[Please, reply/discuss .. separate thread.] Introduction Lots of package seems to have some kind of dependency on "menu" which aren't needed/useful. Therefore, removing the "menu" package on a given system isn't always possible. Also, many packages seems depends, recommends or sugg

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-10-30 Thread Frank lin Piat
> On Sun 30/10/11 11:31 , Daniel Baumann wrote:: > > On 10/29/2011 08:49 PM, Frank lin Piat wrote: >> I intend to submit a mass bug filling to ask packages maintainer to drop or >> downgrade their dependency on "menu": > >[...] > > packages that need r

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on

2011-10-30 Thread Frank lin Piat
On Sun 30/10/11 13:55, "Bernhard R. Link" brl...@debian.org wrote: > * Frank lin Piat [111029 20:49]: > [Please, reply/discuss .. separate thread.] > Please don't put stupid requests into then... > (Not even speaking about the flames outside ). > > > Specio

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on

2011-10-30 Thread Frank lin Piat
On Sun 30/10/11 18:51, "Russ Allbery" r...@debian.org wrote: > Frank lin Piat fp...@klabs.be writes: > On Sun 30/10/11 11:31 , Daniel Baumann wrote:: > >> packages that need root have to use su-to-root in order to play > >> well on live systems (where you know

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on [X-KDE-SubstituteUID]

2011-10-31 Thread Frank lin Piat
> On Mon 31/10/11 11:20 , Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:: > > [Frank lin Piat] > > Any chance to go ahead? It would be a pity if the only solution was > > to fork su-to-root (and possible merge xdg-su[2]) in a new > > source+binary package :-( FYI ... a KDE spec

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-11-04 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 07:20 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Bill Allombert (bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr): > > > > What about moving the su-to-root binary to a different binary package ? > > > Bill what's your PoV about spliting it ? > > In that case, I think that the above discus

Re: Possible mass bug filling for package depending on "menu".

2011-11-04 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 10:21 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:13:43AM +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > Other package that depend on menu... mostly met

Re: Bug#649338: ITP: pxe-kexec -- Retrieves PXE configuration file and kexec entries

2011-11-20 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Hello, Some comment regarding the package description... On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 02:32 +, Dave Walker (Daviey) wrote: > Package: wnpp > > * Package name: pxe-kexec > Description : Retrieves PXE configuration file and kexec entries > Tool that fetches PXE configuration from a TFTP (o

Bug#750138: ITP: scap-workbench -- Scanning and tailoring tool for SCAP content

2014-06-01 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Frank Lin PIAT * Package name: scap-workbench Version : 0.8.8 Upstream Author : Martin Preisler : Maros Barabas * URL : https://fedorahosted.org/scap-workbench/ * License : GPL3 Programming Lang: C

<    1   2