debian/watch problem

2014-06-13 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, I'm struggling to get debian/watch working for the package jing-trang. The problem is upstream says Google no longer allows publishing tarballs under [0]. So they only have tag for the latest release [1]. My question is, is it possible to write a d/watch file for that? [0] https://code.goo

virtual machine from USB stick (virt-manager & qemu/kvm)

2014-06-30 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, I know this question probably doesn't belong to this list, and I tried debian-user@ first, but didn't get a single response. I'm trying to create a VM with Windows 7. Is there a way to do that from USB stick? It is a ~10GB corporate Windows package. Thanks, Eugene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

uscan connection error

2013-05-15 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, I'm trying to download sources using d/watch and uscan. Here is the output of uscan --verbose --force-download: -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line: https://www.saxonica.co.uk/repos/archive/opensource/tags/ (\d.*)/

Re: uscan connection error

2013-05-16 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm trying to download sources using d/watch and uscan.

Re: uscan connection error

2013-05-16 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to download sources using d/watch and uscan. Here is the >> output of uscan --verbose --force-download: >> -- Sc

Re: Unreleased libraries

2014-02-07 Thread Eugene Zhukov
My apologies if something isn't right with this email, I'm writing from my phone. > On 7.2.2014, at 18.25, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > > Hello, > > I am interested in packaging Skia ( https://code.google.com/p/skia/ ), the 2D > library used in Chromium, Firefox and others. I need it because

credentials config at pkg install

2014-12-11 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hi, I plan to package a perl script to run as daemon. It will update dynamic DNS provider with IP changes etc., but for that it needs user credentials registered at provider's web site beforehand. Is it a good solution to ask for credentials at package installation step? These credentials and othe

Re: credentials config at pkg install

2014-12-11 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Thanks for quick replies! I'll go forward with AICCU and debconf way. Not sure if I will eventually upload my package to Debian though, since this dynDNS provider is only for Finland and user base would be small. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Re: Who gets an email when with bugreports [was: Re: Unauthorised activity surrounding tbb package]

2015-01-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Wookey wrote: > +++ Paul Wise [2015-01-19 17:14 +0800]: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >> >> > I can understand your point of view and I think also the why but isn't >> > that position the exception from the rule? That is shouldn't the p

Re: oauth2 sprint at DebConf?

2015-03-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hi! On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Enrico Zini wrote: > Hello, > > the oauth2 part of our single signon system is in need of a team of > people to maintain it, and my experience so far has been that nobody > seems to understand oauth2[1]. > > I would like, in some future, to completely replace

Rebuilding package reverse build-dependencies

2017-02-09 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, I have a package (saxonhe) whose newer versions are not backwards compatible and break other packages (build)depending on it e.g. epubcheck. I guess this is a common problem which sometimes happens with some packages. Is there a way to rebuild all ${package} reverse build-dependencies in on

Re: Rebuilding package reverse build-dependencies

2017-03-13 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Eugene Zhukov wrote: >> I have a package (saxonhe) whose newer versions are not backwards >> compatible and break other packages (build)depending on it e.g. >> epubcheck. I g

Package removal from testing for bug in stable

2016-06-17 Thread Eugene Zhukov
Hello, The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1] bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer version, without a bug). How autoremoval is relevant in this case? [1] Although my question is generic, #826864 triggered this question Thanks, Eugene

Re: Package removal from testing for bug in stable

2016-06-19 Thread Eugene Zhukov
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 17.06.2016 09:31, Eugene Zhukov wrote: > >> The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1] >> bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer >> version, without