Super software, swell prices, splendid service.
http://fnavi.4b81pl4fjwmbj5m.impynjimpy9.com
Man invented language to satisfy his deep need to complain.
Television: chewing gum for the eyes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Package: general
Severity: normal
Working both in squeeze/xfce/thunar and wheezy/lxde/pcmanfm (both up-to-date).
Three computers: Old 1.3GHz/i386, New 2x2.2GHz/amd64 and eeepc 0.9GHz.
Tested on Transcend jetflash 4Gb and Kingston DataTraveler 4Gb.
When I eject the USB flash drive (by right-clickin
On Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:44:20 -0700
Steve Langasek wrote:
SL> 6) Finally, in addition to everything else that's moving out of
/usr/X11R6/,
SL> packages providing fonts for X should now install to /usr/share/fonts/X11
SL> instead of to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts. The heirarchy is the same as
SL
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 11:05:38 +0200
Norbert Preining wrote:
NP> So I let the package depend on debhelper >= 5.0.31, but:
NP> /etc/X11/fonts/Type1/foo.scale
NP> or
NP> /etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/Type1/foo.scale
NP> ?
/etc/X11/fonts/X11R7/Type1/foo.scale
NP> I would say that the fo
Hi all
I've read the debian news announcement today
(http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730). What got me very
interested was the part about a new package format (in my oppinion
this area can be vastly improved, and I'm interested in contributing).
Searching the list archives I was unable to find
2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
> Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>> I've read the debian news announcement today
>> (http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090730). What got me very
>> interested was the part about a new package format
>
> There a
2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
> Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>>
>> 2009/7/31 Giacomo A. Catenazzi :
>>>
>>> Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>> (in my oppinion
>>>> this area can be vastly improved, and I'm interested in con
Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam the list? I just
subscribed and already see spam and phishing attacks...
2009/8/1 Unex Webmaster :
> Unex Webmail Technical Services-
>
> Account Subscriber,
>
> We are currently performing maintenance on our Digital webmail Server
2009/8/1 Tollef Fog Heen :
> ]] Eugene Gorodinsky
>
> | I also think some abstraction from the actual filesystem is a good
> | idea. For example currently the only way to install a lib in a
> | directory other than the one it was intended for is by using a hack
> | that would loo
2009/8/1 brian m. carlson :
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 02:24:28AM +0300, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
>> Is there any way to actually make it harder to spam the list? I just
>> subscribed and already see spam and phishing attacks...
>
> Yes. There are infinitely many ways to make
A while ago I participated in a discussion here about the debian
package format. Quite recently I tried to spark up a discussion about
package formats on the LSB list but did not get any replies, hopefully
this discussion will be more welcome here. Constructive crticism is
welcome, so feel free to
I believe RPM is not suited well enough for this job, it tries to do
everything rather than doing one thing and doing it well. The package
format I'm proposing has a few features rpm does not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
>Not to mention that the package format is not the only thing that matters.
>It is the contents of the package, the rules, specs and standards that are
>followed that cause the most differences.
I aggree, and I'm hoping to resolve this issue
>Oh and I guess I'm missing something, otherwise why wo
> I've read that several times, but I still must be missing something.
>My impression is that your poins is essentially the following: 1. it's
>too much work for "small distros" to use any new format instead of one
>of the big established ones; 2. let's reduce the number of big
>established format
Sorry for the delay, I've been very busy last week.
>> A while ago I participated in a discussion here about the debian
>> package format. Quite recently I tried to spark up a discussion about
>> package formats on the LSB list but did not get any replies
>
>Can you point to the message (preferabl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eugene Kirpichov
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: haskell-strptime
Version : 0.1.8
Upstream Author : Eugene Kirpichov
* URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/package/strptime
* License : New BSD
https://code.google.com/p/jing-trang/downloads/list
[1] https://code.google.com/p/jing-trang/source/browse/#svn%2Ftags%2FV20131210
Thanks,
Eugene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello,
I know this question probably doesn't belong to this list, and I tried
debian-user@ first, but didn't get a single response.
I'm trying to create a VM with Windows 7. Is there a way to do that
from USB stick? It is a ~10GB corporate Windows package.
Thanks,
Eugene
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eugene Seliverstov
* Package name: asn1c
Version : 0.9.21
Upstream Author : Lev Walkin
* URL : http://asn1c.sourceforge.net
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : ASN.1 compiler for C
This ASN.1
/ (\d.*)/
debian debian/orig-tar.sh
uscan warning: In watchfile debian/watch, reading webpage
https://www.saxonica.co.uk/repos/archive/opensource/tags/ failed:
500 Can't connect to www.saxonica.co.uk:443
-- Scan finished
Any clue?
Thanks,
Eugene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to download sources using d/watch and uscan.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm trying to download sources using d/watch and uscan. Here is the
>> output of uscan --verbose --force-download:
>> -- Sc
ple assure me that not.
Thank you,
Eugene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAALuUm+yWVms9byd+cmb-zewRHXpq=XNVWG41RaB4cZx_an=q...@mail.gmail.com
n is all you have.
>
Have you tried asking them (the upstream) for a tag?
I have a couple of times asked politely for a tag from some upstreams and was
lucky to get one, even though the upstream hasn't had a tag in years.
Eugene
s and other configurations I plan to put under
/etc.
If that's OK solution, could you please point me to some example
package doing similar thing?
Thanks,
Eugene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Thanks for quick replies! I'll go forward with AICCU and debconf way.
Not sure if I will eventually upload my package to Debian though,
since
this dynDNS provider is only for Finland and user base would be small.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
tainer
doesn't get mail about a bug.
For example I'm listed as a maintainer of epubcheck package, but I
didn't receive
any email about reported bug #773366.
I've sent a mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org asking about absence of any
notification about reported bug, but no response since
probably more fun when done in a group, so this
> looks like an idea for a DebConf Sprint[3].
>
> Who would be interested in joining this?
>
I've already booked my flight to DebConf.
Eugene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &qu
one go in a more-or-less clean environment (chroot/container/vm)?
Thanks,
Eugene
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:24:48PM +0200, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>> I have a package (saxonhe) whose newer versions are not backwards
>> compatible and break other packages (build)depending on it e.g.
>> epubcheck. I g
Hello,
The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1]
bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer
version, without a bug).
How autoremoval is relevant in this case?
[1] Although my question is generic, #826864 triggered this question
Thanks,
Eugene
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:09 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17.06.2016 09:31, Eugene Zhukov wrote:
>
>> The package is marked for autoremoval from testing, however the RC[1]
>> bug is reported against version in stable (testing has a newer
>> version, without
BY the way, I don't feel comfortable about posting to the developers's
list, although I do lurk there.
I had some trouble installing some packages that needed xforms0.86.
xforms0.86, in turn, needed elf-x11r6lib, which apparently is
obsolete.
Is it safe to install xforms0.86, not including th
system directories, right?
Yes, that's what I mean: what's wrong with making rm -i the default
behaviour? We could do that by simply patching coreutils.
William
And, after this change, each system script that uses rm will ask user
for the confirmation?
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackY
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nlkt
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/nlkt/
* License : GPL
. Package works. Have installed chrony 1.23 - bug doesn't
appear too. Package works. Saw no any endless loops.
- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Evgeni Golov wrote:
>> * License : GFDL
>> Description : free [...]
>
> As far as I understand, GFDL is non-free for Debian :(
Does it (thinkcspy2) contain unmodificable sections?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: daptup
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/daptup
* License : GPLv3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I just searched for the ITP: oss4 mail [1]. Unfortunately I was not
> able to find in in my own debian-devel inbox. So I went to the archive
> http://lists.debian.org/devel.html to search for it and it seems not to
y maintainer with note "it is not a bug". Is he right?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=485759
- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using Gn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 09:57:13PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Recently I've noticed that 'Recommends' chain for package 'banshee' leads to
>> packages,
>> non-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 12-Jun-08, 13:57 (CDT), "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bug was closed by maintainer with note "it is not a bug". Is he right?
>
> Banshee's maintai
dependencies as
multiarch 'same' to allow foreign dependencies to be satisfied with less
number of packages in the system in the long run.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 09:34:42PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>
>> Moreover, this is not the only exception. Thousands of desktop and server
>> packages that contains executable binaries (applications) compiled
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>> What the multiarch spec proposes now is package-oriented approach: the
>> package
>> should define whether it is 'same' or 'foreign' kind. This is not
>> straightforwar
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>>> 2) Tagging package relationships instead of packages means extending
>>> the syntax of package relationsships, trusting the binary packages to
>>> get the depends right
>> You'll
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" writes:
>>>>> 2) Tagging package relationships instead of packages means extending
>>>>> the syntax o
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Except saying "apt sucks", I currently do not have more idea. Someone
> else maybe?
>
/me suggests to try cupt and hides
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer
signature.asc
D
r maintainers of reverse depends,
opposing to your. It has discussed drawback too, of course.
That's all my arguments.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
n't be first-class Debian packages
Fully agree.
While I support automatic generation of debug packages, creating a new format
for them sounds for me as creating new RFC for e-mails which bodies contain no
spaces and no Bcc header allowed. Why? To filter 'automatic debug mails'.
--
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Hello thread! /me puts on a package manager developer hat.
>>
>> Sorry, I haven't read the whole thread, it's huge.
>>
>> I think that diversion of debug packages out of current deb format is a
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2009-08-13, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>> Maybe you should spend some time and read the thread before stating such
>>> things.
>> Really? So, they are already first-class deb packages?
>
> Maybe you should spend some time and re
Andreas Tille wrote:
> I even failed to grep "man apt-get" for the string "suggests" so
> I think I can not do something like
>
>apt-get --include-suggest install
>
-o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jack
Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:35:10AM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>>apt-get --include-suggest install
>>>
>> -o 'Apt::Install-Suggests=1'
>
> Ahh, I remember I was formerly wondering about this option which might
> be
he same
> version),
> and one package can of course supersede many others.
>
I support this, however with not implying Conflicts/Replaces/Provides when
Supersedes is specified. Supersedes would be just a 'proposal' to a package
manager to remove old package name and install the n
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On fredagen den 18 september 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>>> I propose a new control field called e.g. Supersedes that will provide
>>> the same semantics. In its simplest form, a renamed package will declare
>
flicts
>>> foo}
> foo should now be marked as removeable, bar should be marked as
> manually installed (i.e. take the state associated with foo)
>
> Can any of that be achieved with postinst scripts?
That's a very bad idea IMO.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID
Anton Piatek wrote:
> 2009/9/19 Eugene V. Lyubimkin :
>> Anton Piatek wrote:
>>>> This should really be done by the package management, not by the user.
>>> It sounds like you are describing the following:
>>>>> $stable: package foo
>>> manu
is too generic. Can you change it to 'sandboxgamemaker'?
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
kage. Many
> of those either Recommend the relevant package or declare no
> relationship at all.
>
'perl-modules', unlike usual binary/data split, contain executable code that
depends on executable code from 'perl', so it is not another foo-data package.
--
Eugen
:-)
Would be nice to see also 1280x800.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
original tarball works better IMO.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
prerm, postinst) - for sure;
- (postrm) - most probably, checked only a
part so far.
So, the question: how do people think, is a goal to deprecate&remove these
params in dpkg and policy worthy?
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian
ure or in other places.
I always wondered how this params can be used by maintainer scripts, even in
theory.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
gt; future or in other places.
>[...]
>
> A failure of imagination on our art should not be used to block
> this functionality for cases where it might be needed.
With that kind of arguments, the standards cannot ever rid of unused bits.
I am giving up on this proposal
It gives examples of where things can be put in, were you
> inclined to do different things based on how the script is called.
It gives only a code template to do different things, but actually does nothing.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
and it won't be pulled for
Recommends/Suggests).
To summarize: if I am not mistaken, this DEP cannot be implemented due to
technical reasons in its current form.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
David Paleino wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> No, it doesn't. Dpkg and any sane high-level package manager won't
>> consider installing/upgrading/keeping some package (meta or not) without
>> all Depends installed.
>
> We can always change our tools
the bugs or this situation can be resolved through
different approach?
Regards,
- --
Eugene V. Lyubimkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkh82RgACgkQchorMMFUmYymIQCgsQnmJ7pIIBJifTBebGYf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Eugene V. Lyubimkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved through
>> different approach?
>
>
> While you're technically right, app
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qmmp
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Ilya Kotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/qmmp/
* License : GPLv2+
For example, new version of 'libpqxx' package is now in NEW, and it
fixes RC bug (serious, recently appeared), but contains another changes.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Eugene V. Lyubimkin [Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:56:37 +0300]:
>> For example, new version of 'libpqxx' package is now in NEW, and it
>> fixes RC bug (serious, recently appeared), but contains another changes.
>
> I don't see any mention in t
-8 support is a good feature,
especially for processing non-English documents.
Regards,
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
subdirectory of /tmp
>> that is only accessible by that user, and then sets TMPDIR and other
>> variables to that. Hence, it doesn't matter nearly as much if you
>> create a non-random filename, because nobody but you can access it.
>
> Yes, but
> scripts must use $TMPDIR ins
Kenshi Muto wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
>
> At Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:34:18 +0300,
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Utility html2text, version 1.3.2a-6, with "utf8" patch was just uploaded to
>> experimental.
>> The patch allows to process UTF-8 files when '-
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Utility html2text, version 1.3.2a-6, with "utf8" patch was just
>> uploaded to experimental. The patch allows to process UTF-8 files
>> when '-utf8' option supplied. Input should be in UTF-8 and out
almost no doubt this report should be marked 'wontfix'.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
as of yesterday evening, no one had filed an ITP.
>
> Best,
>
Google stands it doesn't available under Linux, what do you suggest to
package? :)
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
g RC bugs in
>>> iceweasel/xulrunner instead.
>>
>>
>>That's right, but at the same time some of us also want to have
>>some fun in Debian.
>
> I want fun, too. Maybe I should orphan these packages.
I don't think so.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qorganizer
Version : 3.1.3
Upstream Author : Balázs Béla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sf.net/projects/qorganizer
* License : GPLv2
do
(requested in
[4]).
Can we remove html2text's http support for squeeze?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285378
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=307425
[3] http://www.mbayer.de/html2text/faq.shtml#sect4
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
n be
done for squeeze (may be, as squeeze release goals?..).
It's my humble view. Does it sound reasonably?
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2008-09-08, Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My proposal is make the new file named, for example, debian/divergences, =
[snip]
> I think you are trying to overengineer something.
> I really prefer the documentation of debian patche
Ben Finney wrote:
> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Many of Debian packages have a patches that fixes some important
>> bugs which have not accepted by upstream for some reasons, some of
>> them also contains improvements, Debian-
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I failed to fetch a human-readable patch info for psi in testing from
>> patch-tracking.debian.net, for example.
>
> Okay, take another example then:
> http://patch-tra
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 14:33 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> Reinhard Tartler wrote:
[snip]
>>> http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/ffmpeg-debian
>> Well, how can users go this site? Is it described in debian policy,
>> devreference, so
Ben Finney wrote:
> "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
>>>> But how can users know about this changes in Debian packages?
>>> By the existing README.Debian and NEWS.Debian conventions (for
>>> persistent and version-sensiti
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 14:57 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>>> BTS and online changelogs linked from the PTS ?
>> For upstream, for Debian people - enough. My proposal is to make
>> user-oriented list. Long changelog entries with some inner pac
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue,09.Sep.08, 15:53:16, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> README.Debian contains notes about important changes that made in
>> Debian's variant of package for a long time of package' lifecycle.
>> NEWS.Debian is especia
a look on packaging of 'apparix' tool, it relies on shell
aliases too for its work.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qprint
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : John Walker <http://www.fourmilab.ch/>
* URL : http://www.fourmilab.ch/webtools/qprint/
* License
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> ..because I do not use GNOME and KDE and it does not suck several
> 100 MByte of useless GNOME and KDE libs!
'evince-gtk' package pulls much less dependencies, I am using it with XFCE.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(m
William Pitcock wrote:
> Unless you're talking about the ugly XMMS GUI. In which case, I believe
> QMMS is available for packaging.
You meant 'QMMP'? It reproduces XMMS GUI and it is in unstable already.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)
t that is another discussion :-)
Actually, apt-get is more often used as non-interactive package manager, so I
would not
add interactive "asker" to it. Aptitude, however, has all chances and
opportunities to
implement it.
All above is IMO.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jac
we have not-so-excellent, but rather good apt, and
significant amount of Debian users choose Debian just only because of apt. IMO.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
Ukrainian C++ Developer, Debian Maintainer, APT contributor
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
isn't backed by facts,
One big fact is: Debian have tens (or even hundreds) of tools that use apt
infrastructure, including both user side and archive maintenance side. Nix, in
any way it operates, suggests other API to maintain packages. Who is supposed
to rewrite all this stuff for Nix?
>
Artyom Shalkhakov wrote:
> 2008/12/24 Eugene V. Lyubimkin :
>> Which means that "find all dependencies with no exceptions" is not true.
>
> This is how Nix developers put it:
>
>> Runtime dependencies are found by scanning binaries for the hash parts
>&
Tracking System that permits RC bugs to remain in the next releases of
> Debian when the report is closed incorrectly and nobody notices before
> they are out.
bug-maint-info.txt file is in package 'doc-debian', reassigned
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)
nacceptable to drop fbreader from Lenny. Please
coordinate with
me. (BTW, I was not anyhow pinged and noticed this only right now and only by
good chance.
Badly.)
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
Ukrainian C++ developer, Debian Maintainer, APT
1 - 100 of 169 matches
Mail list logo
