oday and break tomorrow.
Could --shallow-since= (one month ago, or one year ago) be another
possible thing to consider?
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/634F4BD1E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
ost-sarge. The team is small, but work is going forward, with
outstanding results that are just waiting to be integrated a bit more in
normal Debian tools. And there's work going on also for that.
People wishing to help, or to know more, please drop me a note.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key
use?
One may want to use tools written in a language they know, so that if
something breaks, it may be easier to fix it.
I, for one, do this kind of reasoning, and don't feel much comfortable
in running things written in languages I don't know (yet).
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/
g.
Now admin::backup counts 61 packages: good!
If someone wants to take care of keeping the admin::backup tag up to
date, please send me a note.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
he application to see if there
are things that could be added.
Then, click on File/"Mail changes to central database". That's it.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lease X-Debbugs-Cc me so that
I can offer help (I prefer not to report the bug myself because I have
never used jigdo).
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
stion: where do we collect this kind of tips?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: festvox-itsomething
Version : unknown
Upstream Author : ISTC-SPFD CNR <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.csrf.pd.cnr.it/TTS/It-FESTIVAL-license.htm
* License : GPL (Final
documentation and a couple of plugins.
For those cases, a more finer-grained approach would be needed. One
idea is to use the already existing but not that used Enhances field.
Thoughts?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:45:06PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Enrico Zini proposed to use Enhances: instead which seems more correct
> > than Suggests.
> What does Enhances do *exactly*? Or is it just "for
o group it as
something gravitating around the world of ifupdown).
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s in Debian, but people don't usually
notice them. I guess it's partly because they are not called "Debian
Something", and in part because in many of them the barrier of entry
gets high in term of competences, since they have a substantial level of
specialisation.
Ciao,
Enrico
-
t used at working with
Debian and you are super-quick at passing NM.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ebtags, and
possibly crafting some ad-hoc graphical interface that data.
I'll be super happy to help!
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
r" and "apt-cache search
networkmanager" but could not find it.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ot with hot sausage!
Ciao,
Enrico and the movement of Italians Against Pizza Blasphemes ;)
[Cc-ing to debian-curiosa, thread should follow there, where someone can
also teach me how to comfortably set mail-followup things in mutt]
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL
debtags and debtags-edit based on the new libs
In the meantime, I've been able to restore commit messages to the
debtags-commits list. They were still stuck after the alioth->svn move.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 04:05:31PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I renamed libtagcoll-dev to libtagcoll1-dev and libdebtags-dev to
> libdebtags1-dev, and I'm considering uploading to unstable in a day or
> two:
>
> - it's too late for it to go in sid (good!)
> - it
options. I'm short of clues for the best
way of doing this, and I'd be happy to give access to the svn repository
of people who could help and work on it together.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
now I have quite clear what needs to be done.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
time as upstream developer of
Debtags, and has always to choke on some obscure packaging stuff
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; stage than in a
"let's make this efficient".
It'd actually be quite interesting to redesign these algorithms
efficiently: if someone knows C++ and STL and algorithmics and wants a
challenge, please contact me.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in said a bit more: whoever is
interested in doing this, please join us in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list[1].
Ciao,
Enrico
[1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Descr
r instead
> of working around it? You may find valgrind useful for this.
I had done that already: valgrind only shows a few issues inside the
Perl code.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
AIL PROTECTED] [2], although it's not clear yet
how to properly implement CDD-specific tagging and it could be quite a
complicated "first task" to pick up.
Ciao,
Enrico
[1] http://debtags.alioth.debian.org
[2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
lian locale?
I've been it_IT.UTF-8 for quite a while with no problems. And I also
get to be able to write the name of my girlfriend, which Latin1 cannot
encode, together with accented Italian words, which BIG5 cannot encode.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
when writing mixed languages in
the boundary regions where there is more than one official language.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ood that I cope with the stress by instead
enduring the wait high up in the Alps :)
Ciao,
Enrico
[1] http://debtags.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/edit.cgi?pkg=PKGNAME
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that mailman is easy to use for you. Now I know who to bugger
on IRC when I have a problem with it :)
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python-debtags
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debtags/python
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Access D
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cnf
Version : 4.0
Upstream Author : Various from Council for the Central Laboratory of
the Research Councils ("CCLRC") and stated at the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dballe
Version : 2.5
Upstream Author : Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for ARPA SIM
* URL : http://www.smr.arpa.emr.it/software/DBalle.html
* License : GPL
g as soon as possible.
If you need help, know-how on the tagcoll/ept codebase usually hangs out
in the #ekhis IRC channel on freenode.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
test suite passes.
It looks like a similar gcc problem as previously found, always in
tagcoll: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=358493
I'm now working on producing something that looks like a gcc test case.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini &l
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:33:48PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I'm now working on producing something that looks like a gcc test case.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=393275
I'll now upload a new version of tagcoll2 that builds with -O1 on Alpha,
working aroun
g on libwibble-dev
and libept-dev.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a vote
> [ 1 ] Choice 2: The DPL's withdrawal of the delegation stands until a vote
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hread for a previous discussion on the
same problem: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/07/msg00281.html
Ciao,
Enrico who got frustrated when trying to categorise it.
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
e.debian.org/~enrico/dcg
[2] http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ch02s04.html
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in a way or another we'll have updated tags in
unstable again.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to jail if he
willingly uploads some malicious code.
This prompts me that we should probably be taking trusted notes of birth
dates and birth places, because it's hard to physically trace one person
down just given his or her name.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enric
e to setup flamenco to give a view of Debian packages using
debtags.
Would someone want to pickup the task? I can help with providing the
debtags data digested in all sort of formats.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Desc
roject: http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2006 (see DebtagsAI)
[2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2006-July/001292.html
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:40:57PM +0200, Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Many thanks to the KDE developers for removing the similar blurb that
> > they used to have. They did it nicely, and in
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 01:52:57PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> la, 2006-07-08 kello 12:40 +0200, Enrico Zini kirjoitti:
> > some groups of packages in Debian share introductory pieces in the
> > package description. For example, most pike packages have this:
> I tend to lik
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:55:33PM -0400, David B Harris wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/devel/, "Projects" section:
>
> * Debian Web Pages
[...]
> * Alioth: Debian GForge
> Certainly seems that they're listed.
The Debian Usability Research seems to be missing:
http://deb-usability.alioth
he software is bad, but because the
maintainer has no time, capacitiy or resources to promote it.
It's been some time I'm having these thoughts, I'm happy I've finally
found an occasion to share them.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ackage searches. That
quite broadens my view.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bug#116747, bug#47451 and bug#165241,
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 11:04:30PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> libtagcoll0, Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Already asked for removal, now supserseded by libtagcoll1-{dev,pic}.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HAYAYYY!!!
$ svn st|grep ^C
C debian/control
C README
C configure.ac
Small things easy to resolve. Wow! It's done!
Ciao,
Enrico and the emotion of finally doing a real merge :)
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
:raster
zoph: +works-with::image:raster
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 08:42:53PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> I'm checking the new tag updates from the packagebrowser.
Am I nuts today? I wrote twice debian-devel instead of debtags-devel :(
Good thing are, debian-devel gets some peek at what's happening in
debtags-devel, and t
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
I've recently been making a new debtags version at least once a day: either
some chunk of the gcc migration, or yet another APT ABI change, or who knows
what's going to happen tomorrow.
I'm tired, and I haven't been writing any line of code for it anymore si
le kind of libstdc++.
So I write here, so that at least the mess is made known. If someone
can see any plans for solutions, I can't :(
Ciao,
Enrico
[1] Description: Smart Common Input Method platform
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 12:12:13PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 08:31:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> >
> > Applications linked with libstdc++5 and using GTK segfault when using
> > SCIM[1] as input method, and neither GTK nor SCIM nor the apps se
app, not the one that the library is linked against.
> Segfault.
Wow. Should I go on and report something, or can I consider the g++
maintainers as already aware?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rico
[1] apt-get install libapt-front-dev
http://libapt-front.alioth.debian.org
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
mized versions?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bly has it in his own interpretation of
freeware.
Maybe he can be talked into removing the ambiguity and formalizing it in
a clearer existing license? Looks like he's wanting a BSD one.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
oing svn up and don't
do it again before one minute.
Better ideas would of course be welcome.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
TECTED]>
Python version of the Olson timezone database
python-unit
Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
unit test framework for Python (default version)
python-weblib
Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yet another web programming framework for Python - library
python-xlib
Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Interface for Python to the X11 Protocol (dummy package)
python-xml
Alexandre Fayolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
XML tools for Python [dummy package]
python-zopeinterface
Tommi Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Python library for API definitions through interfaces (dummy)
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ng to debian-custom as metapackages are quite a
substantial topic over there.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hard job?
I at least would welcome a place where I can put some of my stuff
somewhere.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
It has been brought to my attention that we don't have .desktop files
to launch what is the standard Debian way to launch web browsers and
terminal emulators: how come?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
con-developers/2007-June/001374.html
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
re is a
translation in the system by looking at what *i18n_Translation* files
are available. Then, for every such file, it tries to extract the
translated description, and then index them.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
ossibly wrong)
Description-de.noguide header instead of the normal Description-de, so
looking up "Description-de" gave an error.
I now ignore translated descriptions for those packages that do not have
the header that I'm looking for.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB
red?
I'm asking because of #436161: the list of such marks seems like a
perfect data source for a prototype.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
st on every issue, and point to the full checklist to
find more.
Opinions?
Entries for http://wiki.debian.org/TidyUpChecklist ?
Ciao,
Enrico
[1] Namely, telling a NM applicant that he should attend to a few things
that have been bitrotting, and then looking at my own DDPO page, erhm.
--
GPG ke
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
* Package name: xcowsay
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Nick Gasson
* URL : http://www.doof.me.uk/xcowsay/
* License : GPL 3 or later
Programming Lang: C
Description : Graphical configurable talking
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini
* Package name: cfget
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : Enrico
* URL : http://www.enricozini.org/sw/cfget/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : featureful tool to read values from
or something,
eventually make it into the stable, well-known core, so this isn't a bad
thing at all.
Still, I wish they'd listen.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ere better fsck strategies?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
answer is yes, ^C is officially safe, then I propose to add "if
in a hurry, interrupt with ^C " to the "check forced" message.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be
reproduced with the -1 version that is in Debian now.
What's going on? How can I build this thing correctly here?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pkg
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : hg clone http://hg.debian.org/hg/private/enrico/libpkg
* License : LGPL
Program
n in #debian-devel, I went for 'upt'.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ggregated score is computed with this (rather arbitrary) weighted
sum:
score = vote + recent * 0.5 + old * 0.3 + nofiles * 0.1
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
kages depending on the current libept on this new library; since the
current libept is too complex to be manageable, we solve two problems
(maintaining the old library and naming the new one) by just superseding
it.
BTW, xapian full text index of package descriptions is coming :)
Ciao,
En
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:57:55AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> BTW, xapian full text index of package descriptions is coming :)
Committed now!
\o/
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
You're late: it's ept now :)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/06/msg00103.html
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
something along those lines.
"puzzle game", I should say.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t; The user can overright these setting by changning them in the tools -> options
> -> language settings menu.
It sounds like a useful package, but please add to the description an
expansion of the CTL acronym.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PR
mple data, but I'll
be away for the week-end.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:25:44PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> - compute a "delicateness" index of a package by summing the SAT
>temperature of all packages that depend on it, and then give special
>attention to the most "delicate" packages to see RC bugs, ma
into the VCS could do
the job; is there really no utility to replay changes from Moin's
history to a VCS, and changes from a VCS history into moin?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
offs were
made to have a single screenshot that would look decent on screen as
well as on print.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;arch=i386&stamp=1216774836&file=log
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
something like this before you
start doing your builds of the day:
schroot -c sid-source -- sh -c "apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade; apt-get
autoclean; apt-get clean"
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:57:40AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Enrico Zini wrote:
> > and found that not even our buildds check signatures
> The reason they do this is that they build from incoming
> (queue/accepted). And incoming is not signed. I asked
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:08:57AM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> It seems that you can't, in my version of sbuild, unless you patch the
> code.
...and if you want to patch the code, you can actually do it using the
patch that I've just prepared and sent at
http://bugs.de
t-start-mysql-by-default.html
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nes that nfs-mount /etc and /usr, but not
/var, or machines updated by rsyncing /etc and /usr?
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: openmoocow
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Thomas White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~taw27/openmoko/openmoocow/
* License : GPL v3
osals/CopyrightFormat
happens and see if I can automatically derive a facet out of those
information.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nd),
some have very clearly defined meanings.
The role::* tags were designed to cope with this use case, but indeed
until there is some consistency enforced, they can't really replace
sections.
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to be expected.
(maintainers can enter this information in debian/control and I can scan it
using Mole)
Ciao,
Enrico
--
GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 304 matches
Mail list logo
