I really don't think that a "progressive" branch is necessary. The
problems involved in keeping track of three branches at one time and
trying to keep version dependencies in order between branches would far
out weigh any benefit that would be created by such a branch. IMHO the
structure (stable,
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:36:47PM -0500, Ed Szynaka wrote:
> > The problem that I see is that there is too much time between stable
> > releases. I think that shorter and much more regular time periods
> > between freezes is necessary. By fixing the number and date of
2 matches
Mail list logo
