On 19 November 2018 at 16:59, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
| Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:52 Uhr schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel
:
| >
| >
| > Hi Ian,
| >
| > Thanks for the follow-up.
| >
| > On 19 November 2018 at 15:45, Ian Jackson wrote:
| > | Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("O
On 19 November 2018 at 17:32, Sean Whitton wrote:
| Hello,
|
| On Mon 19 Nov 2018 at 01:15PM -0500, Chris Lamb wrote:
|
| > Hi Dimitri,
| >
| >> […] e.g. using reproducible builds infra to do "build in
| >> --no-merged-usr, rebuild in --merged-usr, result should be the same"
| >> either as a on
On 20 November 2018 at 02:35, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| > | > … Simon McVittie has actually patched our testing framework to vary
| > | > this and this is now live.
| > | >
| > | > https://bugs.debian.org/901473#33
| […]
| > Are we sure this is fixed?
|
| It might have taken a while fo
On 27 November 2018 at 08:04, Kurt Hornik wrote:
| The new r-base-core (3.5.1-2+b1) also seems fine on i386. Thanks!
Great news, thanks for reporting back!
All systems green, and Chris (was usual) right along :)
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-writexl
Version : 1.4.2
Upstream Author : Jeroen Ooms
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=writexl
* License : BSD-2
Description : GNU R package to write xlsx file
A couple of days ago, the (effective) Maintainer and rather active developer
of the Matrix package Mikael Jagan (CC'ed) posted on the r-package-devel list
(the primary list for R package development) that the upcoming change of
Matrix 1.7-0, planned for March 11, will be _very midly disruptive_ b
On 27 February 2024 at 19:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| A couple of days ago, the (effective) Maintainer and rather active developer
| of the Matrix package Mikael Jagan (CC'ed) posted on the r-package-devel list
| (the primary list for R package development) that the upcoming chan
On 22 March 2024 at 11:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 27 February 2024 at 19:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | A couple of days ago, the (effective) Maintainer and rather active developer
| | of the Matrix package Mikael Jagan (CC'ed) posted on the r-package-devel
list
| | (the pr
On 23 March 2024 at 07:25, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 22 March 2024 at 11:12, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| |
| | On 27 February 2024 at 19:01, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | | A couple of days ago, the (effective) Maintainer and rather active
developer
| | | of the Matrix package Mikael
Julian,
Arrow is a complicated and large package. We use it at work (where there is a
fair amount of Python, also to Conda etc) and do have issues with more
complex builds especially because it is 'data infrastructure' and can come in
from different parts. I would recommend against packaging at
R 4.4.0 will be released on April 24 (following the long established pattern
of annual 'a.b.0' releases). As is common, nightlies (as alpha, betas, rc)
have been made available for four weeks leading up to it. I uploaded a first
beta release r-base_4.3.3.20240409-1 to 'experimental' a week ago, I
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-nanotime
Version : 0.3.2
Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel and Leonardo Silvestri
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/eddelbuettel/nanotime
* License : GPL-2+
Description
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xrprof
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Aaron Jacobs
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/atheriel/xrprof
* License : GPL-2
Description : External sampling profiler for R
This (still
Does anybody know where we are with respect to the WNPPs / ITPs / ... on the
Amazon SDK for C++?
I have a package that could take advantage of this if it were packaged, and I
am sure a number of other packages are in a similar situation given how
pervasive AWS use is. So does anybody know where
Hi Noah,
On 26 December 2021 at 20:18, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
| On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 06:08:56PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > I have a package that could take advantage of this if it were packaged, and
I
| > am sure a number of other packages are in a similar situation giv
(Dual reply to two emails)
On 30 December 2021 at 23:32, Wookey wrote:
| On 2021-12-26 18:08 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Does anybody know where we are with respect to the WNPPs / ITPs / ... on the
| > Amazon SDK for C++?
| >
| > I have a package that could take ad
On 31 December 2021 at 07:51, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 30 December 2021 at 22:17, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
| | On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 08:10:50AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > My (very informal) packaging has always been in the open (but on GitHub).
A
| | > possible first step
On 13 January 2022 at 19:18, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
| On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 10:31:03AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > You have a large set there which covers three of the ones I'd need. Could
| > you upload these:
| >
| > https://salsa.debian.org/rvandegrift/aws-c-c
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-simplermarkdown
Version : 0.0.4
Upstream Author : Jan van der Laan
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=simplermarkdown
* License : GPL (>= 3)
Description : GN
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-tiledb
Version : 0.11.0
Upstream Author : TileDB Inc
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/TileDB-Inc/TileDB-R
* License : MIT
Description : R Interface to the TileDB Storage Engine
Hi all,
Maybe someone on the list can help with a sharp insight before I go trying.
The r-base source package (for the R system and language) has a somewhat
cobbled together debian/rules [1], mostly of my making over the last 20+
years since I helped Doug more and more and eventually took it ov
Ian, Guillem,
On 19 September 2019 at 14:51, Ian Jackson wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload"):
| > Maybe someone on the list can help with a sharp insight before I go trying.
| >
| > The r-base source packag
On 19 September 2019 at 20:40, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| On 19 September 2019 at 16:03, Guillem Jover wrote:
| | On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 07:15:43 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | > So presumably the dependency graph within debian/rules is wrong. Would
| | > anybody her
On 20 September 2019 at 13:27, Ian Jackson wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel writes ("Re: Possible doc package side-effect from going
source-only upload [and 1 more messages]"):
| > -build: build-arch
| > +## edd 19 Sep 2019 for source uploads also build build-indep
| > +build: bui
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-
jA0ECQMC+vR93/THh2j/0sEcAdxV3lOzN7OrqPBVT6sfCMHfx3NJ3AzYHLeMsvn/
3RvYw/bzKhEgcvOAr8QA6aL0LWJwQpdKh/bhzoXRFtkhNHyjKl+LcsWY4Ldc/3oX
TdbNcVQdcNuXTGev5ZhM3hPpABF3VSyAY1DysLcdnEmC/57afMUNRu3MEcXJZMJr
dyDhaEQPsjABAoIAK0GtnjvRUXk+qeJjJVsoTib+LRojml2tODKvMUk+GO9RvvXo
1rD3qkTL8M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 26 December 2019 at 14:15, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
| - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| 7b77e0f2-4ff9-4adb-85e4-af249191f27a
| [ 3 ] Choice 1: F: Focus on systemd
| [ 2 ] Choice 2:
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-tmvnsim
Version : 1.0-2
Upstream Author : Samsiddhi Bhattacjarjee
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=tmvnsim
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R package for
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-conquer
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Xuming He, Xiaoou Pan, Kean Ming Tan, and Wen-Xin Zhou
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=conquer
* License : GPL-3
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-gsl
Version : 0.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Dirk Eddelbuettel and Romain Francois
* URL or Web page : http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/code/rcpp.gsl.html
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-htmltable
Version : 1.7-1
Upstream Author : Max Gordon
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=htmlTable
* License : GPL-3
Description : GNU R package for advanced html
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-viridis
Version : 0.3.4-1
Upstream Author : Simon Garnier
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=viridis
* License : MIT
Description : GNU R package with color maps
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-manipulatewidgets
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Jalal-Edine Zawam, Francois Guillem, JJ Allaire, Marion
Praz, Benoit Thieurmel, Titouan Robert and Duncan Murdoch
* URL or Web page : https
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-openxlsx
Version : 4.0.17
Upstream Author : Alexander Walker
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/awalker89/openxlsx
* License : GPL-3
Description : GNU R package for XLSX files
When working in a source directory named foo-1.2.3/, and then hitting C-c v in
debian/changelog, the mode smartly figures out the version number and creates
and appropriate new entry 1.2.3-1.
When working in a git repo where the directory is just foo/ this fails and
the changelog just increments
An upstream package I look after switched from sf.net to bintray. Do we have
a trick to parse layout via uscan?
Please CC me as I am no longer subscribed to debian-devel.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
On 26 May 2018 at 10:17, Paul Wise wrote:
| On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > An upstream package I look after switched from sf.net to bintray.
|
| Which upstream? Please link to bintray.
Quantlib.
upstream web https://www.quantlib.org/
upstream src ht
On 26 May 2018 at 10:42, Paul Wise wrote:
| On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > Quantlib.
| > upstream web https://www.quantlib.org/
| > upstream src https://github.com/lballabio/QuantLib
| > my srchttps://salsa.debian.org/edd/quantlib
|
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-rio
Version : 0.5.10
Upstream Author : Thomas Leeper
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=rio
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R package with Swiss-army knife for
On 26 May 2018 at 11:00, Paul Wise wrote:
| On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 10:50 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| >https://www.quantlib.org/download.shtml
|
| The bintray URL there eventually points here:
|
| https://dl.bintray.com/quantlib/releases/
|
| That has all the versions and if
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-zip
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Gábor Csárdi, Kuba Podgórski, and Rich Geldreich
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=zip
* License : CC0
Description : GNU R
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-viridislite
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Simon Garnier
* URL or Web page :
https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/viridisLite/index.html
* License : MIT
Description : Default
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-rematch
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Gabor Csardi
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=rematch
* License : MIT
Description : R package to match regular
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-cellranger
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Jennifer Bryan
* URL or Web page :
https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/cellranger/index.html
* License : MIT
Description : GNU R
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-ttr
Version : 0.23-1
Upstream Author : Joshua Ulrich
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/joshuaulrich/TTR
* License : GPL-2
Description : GNU R package to construct technical
Dear release team,
I would appreciate some attention for https://bugs.debian.org/868558
- I filed it on July 16.
- I followed up on July 29.
- I followed up on August 6.
- I answered a question on August 10.
- I followed up on August 19.
- I answered a question on August 26, and followed up on A
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-readstata13
Version : 0.9.0-1
Upstream Author : Jan Marvin Garbuszus, Sebastian Jeworutzki
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/sjewo/readstata13
* License : GPL-2
Description : R
at 06:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Hi guys,
|
| Package r-cran-readstata13 is now a required build-dependency of another
| package we had in Debian for a decade. So I prepared r-cran-readstata13 five
| weeks ago, and followed up with a revision a week ago (adding README.source).
|
| Could
On 14 October 2017 at 14:47, James McCoy wrote:
| On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:59:10PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
| >
| > Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue?
| > [...]
| >
| > The p
On 14 October 2017 at 21:59, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > The passive-aggressive "we won't work on your package, and won't tell you
| > why" is a wee bit annoying.
|
| This is an uncharitable interpretation of the situation. There is no
On 14 October 2017 at 22:00, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
| On Sat, 2017-10-14 at 12:59 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > Bumping this as my mail to ftpmaster went unanswered.
| >
| > Could someone please remind me who to ask about the NEW Queue? It is
| > causing
| > me a FTBFS
Chris,
On 15 October 2017 at 00:04, Chris Lamb wrote:
| [Drpopping -release from CC, they are busy enough]
|
| Dirk,
|
| > [Thomas Lumley] is not listed in DESCRIPTION
|
| He has a copyright attribution in R/read.R IIRC but there may be other
| instances and other copyright holders. You would
On 15 October 2017 at 15:10, Chris Lamb wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| > Checking the file now and ... he _is_ in the debian/copyright
|
| In that case, I'll just add "only human" and (possibly) "overworked"
| along with my previous description of the ftpteam
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-readr
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham, Jim Hester, Romain Francois
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/tidyverse/readr
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Description : GN
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-forcats
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/tidyverse/forcats
* License : GPL-3
Description : GNU R package for working with
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-cardata
Version : 3.0-0
Upstream Author : John Fox, Sanford Weisberg and Brad Price
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=carData
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Descript
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-nortest
Version : 1.0-4
Upstream Author : Juergen Gross and Uwe Ligges
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=nortest
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Description : GNU R pack
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-haven
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream Author : Hadley Wickham and Evan Miller
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/tidyverse/haven
* License : MIT
Description : GNU R package to import
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-fastica
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : J L Marchin, C Heaton and B D Ripley
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=fastICA
* License : GPL (>= 2)
Description : GN
Hi all,
Just built R 3.4.3 which was released a few hours ago, but I can't push it
via dput and dupload. Everything times out.
Is usper.debian.org down or unreachable?
If a made a simple mistake of not catching a new upload mechanism, could
someone kindly clue me in (maybe by private email repl
On 30 November 2017 at 07:38, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Hi all,
|
| Just built R 3.4.3 which was released a few hours ago, but I can't push it
| via dput and dupload. Everything times out.
|
| Is usper.debian.org down or unreachable?
Better now, and r-base_3.4.3 is being upload. Than
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-rstudioapi
Version : 0.7
Upstream Author : JJ Allaire, Hadley Wickham, Kevin Ushey and Gary Ritchie
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/rstudio/rstudioapi
* License : MIT
Description
Hi all,
I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the main R packages.
And now all of sudden it wants to build a -dbgsym package.
That may not be such a good idea for the several hundred r-cran-* packages.
I have
Hi Niels,
Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
| > the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped wi
On 20 December 2015 at 21:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| >
| > Hi Niels,
| >
| > Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
| >
| > On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| > | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > | > I
On 20 December 2015 at 22:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
| And what version of lintian is this? If you are using lintian from
| unstable or stable-backports, you shouldn't be seeing these warnings.
I see.
| I am sorry, I am not sure what you are asking. Perhaps you could tell
| me in details what y
Niels,
On 20 December 2015 at 22:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 20 December 2015 at 22:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
| | And what version of lintian is this? If you are using lintian from
| | unstable or stable-backports, you shouldn't be seeing these warnings.
|
| I see.
|
| | I am
I needed to rebuild r-base to have it use openjdk8 rather openjdk7, but I am
stumped at a font / permission / latexing issue. I have built this package
hundreds of times, and the last time about three weeks ago for r-base_3.2.3-5.
But now it fails at
make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/r-base-3.
Holger, Adam,
On 18 February 2016 at 20:04, Adam Borowski wrote:
| On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:23:21PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
| > On Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > > I needed to rebuild r-base to have it use openjdk8 rather openjdk7, but I
| > >
Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes:
> | Same on regular (unreproducible) sid, just tested on amd64, i386 and
armhf.
>
> Thanks for the feedback! Any idea why my regular / standard pbuilder with
> chroot would all of a sudden behave differently?
It would appear that something
Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes:
> It would appear that something changed in one of the underlying, and I had
> taken a shortcut of making by chroot base.tgz a littler 'fatter' by
> preloading. Pruning and starting over appears to have fixed the issue.
Dang. An
Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes:
>
> Dirk Eddelbuettel debian.org> writes:
> > It would appear that something changed in one of the underlying, and I
had
> > taken a shortcut of making by chroot base.tgz a littler 'fatter' by
> > preloading. P
Package: wnpp
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: r-cran-bh
Version : 1.60.0-1-1
Upstream Author : Jay Emerson and Dirk Eddelbuettel
* URL or Web page : http://cloud.r-project.org/package=BH
* License : BSL-1.0
Description : GNU R package
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dirk Eddelbuettel
* Package name: r-cran-reformulas
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Ben Bolker
* URL or Web page : https://cran.r-project.org/package=reformulas
* License : GPL-3
Programming lang: R
Description : GNU R
On 16 April 2025 at 18:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
| I haven't checked why they are there, but there are several packages in
| the key package set [1]. I would be good to check beforehand what
| happens if they are removed on those architectures. I think it's best to
| assume for now that you can't
On 16 April 2025 at 19:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On 16-04-2025 18:55, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
| >
| > That appears to be a different set of packages.
|
|
| The packages spotted in the original list, I assu
301 - 375 of 375 matches
Mail list logo
