M$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$
UB+++>$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++()$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K-
w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-)
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e-> h* r? z*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
David Mandelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t to death; their blood shall be upon them.
>
That's not anti-homosexual, that's anti-bisexual. "as he lieth with a woman"
implies that he has to lie with women the same way as with men for it to be
applicable.
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$
UB+++>$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++()$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K-
w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-)
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e-> h* r? z*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
David Mandelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
GOMBAS Gabor wrote:
> ... which would mean that it would become unaccessible (and thus
> meaningless) as the real /var gets mounted later in the boot process.
> You cannot reliably put it under a directory that is not guaranteed to
> be on the root file system; that leaves roughly /, /etc, /bin, /l
Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, David Mandelberg wrote:
>>TMPDEV="`mktemp -d /tmp/devXX || { mkdir /.dev; echo -n /.dev; }`"
>>mount -o bind /dev $TMPDEV
>>mount -t tmpfs none /dev
>>mkdir /dev/orig
>>mount -o bind $TMPDEV /dev/orig
>&g
Adeodato Simà wrote:
> # test -r /proc/1/root || echo "Inside a chroot"
What if an postinst script at some point drops privs to a non-root user and
grsec is preventing it from reading any process' info other than its own user's?
Also, as pointed out earlier this wouldn't work on HURD.
signatu
usr/lib/$i" "$DESTDIR/usr/share/$i"
ln -s "/usr/share/$i" "$DESTDIR/usr/lib/$i"
done
--
David Mandelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 23:47 +0100, Paul Brossier wrote:
> * Package name: freecycle
I'm not sure if it applies, but there's a US trademark on "freecycle";
see <http://www.freecycle.org/>
--
David Mandelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 03:53 -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> As far as spam harvester are concerned, they can just subscribe to the
> mailing-lists to get the mail headers.
I think if they subscribe to the mailing list and use it for abuse they
can easily be banned, whereas they can't be banned from
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 19:40 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> GNU version of OpenSSL (I don't recall how
> it is called).
GnuTLS I think.
--
The attachment "signature.asc" (if it exists) is a digital signature.
Unless you know what that is, you can completely ignore it. It is mostly
ha
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 20:15 -0400, David Mandelberg wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 19:40 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > GNU version of OpenSSL (I don't recall how
> > it is called).
>
> GnuTLS I think.
Stupid mail misconfiguration, I sent this before I go
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e->++++ h* r? z*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
David Mandelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$
UB+++>$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++()$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K-
w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-)
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e-> h* r? z*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
David Mandelberg
[EMAIL PROT
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$
UB+++>$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++()$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K-
w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-)
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e-> h* r? z*
--END GE
lt;...>'.
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.1
GAT/CM$/CS>$/CC/IT$/M/S/O/U dpu s+:++ !a C++$>C+++$
UB+++>++++$L$*-- P+>++$ L+++()$ E-(---) W+++>$ N(+) o? K-
w--(---) O? M V? PS++@ PE-@ Y+@ PGP++(+++)>$ t? 5? X? R tv--(-)
b++(+++)@ DI? D? G e-> h* r? z*
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
David Mandelberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
