Hello,
Am Freitag, den 30.12.2005, 08:35 +0100 schrieb Frank Lichtenheld:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 11:55:17PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
> > guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
Hello everybody,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2006, 17:40 +0100 schrieb Luca Capello:
> 2) will the package be based on the unofficial Debian (but official
>Ekiga) snapshot available at [1]?
it'd make a lot of sense to do this together with the pkg-voip group.
They already prepared packages for opa
Hi everybody,
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2005, 11:54 -0700 schrieb Matt Zimmerman:
> In some cases, Ubuntu maintainers are not also Debian maintainers, and as
> such would require sponsorship in order to upload their packages to Debian.
> Ubuntu, on the other hand, imports all new source packages from
Hello everybody,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 10:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Having the Ubuntu maintainer as co-maintainer would be a drastical
> advance for both Debian and Ubuntu.
Thanks Andreas for pointing this out. I am really happy to hear interest
in this. Since we're all working on
Hello Peter, hi everybody else,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.06.2005, 14:08 +0200 schrieb Peter Van Eynde:
> A message like this makes you the perfect victim :-) for my question:
> what should a debian maintainer do to have his or her packages in
> universe in a good shape? I'm even willing to build the pa
Hey Pierre, hey everybody else,
I now quote some lines I found pretty important for the whole
discussion:
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 09:04 +0200 schrieb Pierre Habouzit:
> A push method (wrt us) would be better than a pull (from us) one.
> We have not time to pull.
> we have bloate
Dear Andreas,
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 11:52 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > It has been said that it is too much of a
> > burden for Debian maintainers to process the patches, and Ubuntu currently
> > has a miniscule number of developers compared to Debian.
> I wonder why the statement
>
Dear Andreas
Am Donnerstag, den 02.06.2005, 12:05 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Somebody might find the appropriate term for "we do not try
> hard to search more effective ways".
I thought very highly of you, when you (as one voice of many) said
"group maintenance". I want to highlight, underlin
Hi Petter,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 18:38 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
> maintainers are not too happy about Debian, and would only like to
> maintain packages in Ubuntu. We need a procedure for this case as
> well.
Do you ha
Hello Dale,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:29 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> >From the first CD I installed, I realized it was a fork...and a disapointing
> one at that. (Pretty desktop on live CD didn't install from installation CD,
> but the fact that their archives only hold their limited pa
Hey Dale,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 12:33 -0400 schrieb Dale C. Scheetz:
> When using apt-get on a system installed from the installation CD (not the
> live
> CD) apt-get points to the Ubuntu archives, which only contain a very limited
> subset of Debian's main archives. I had limited success i
Hi Bill,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 11:47 -0500 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> > This is not going to work for all packages, as some package
> > maintainers are not too happy about Debian, and would only like to
> > maintain packages in Ubuntu. We need a procedure for this case as
> > well.
>
> Shou
Hi Petter,
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 20:14 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> [Daniel Holbach]
> > Do you have a particular case in mind?
>
> I'm not going to provide examples, no.
I'm very unhappy, about your answers and this whole thread in general.
Don't
Hi Petter,
thank you very much for that mail.
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 21:01 +0200 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen:
> And more specificly, we are discussing how to make sure (new/not in
> debian) packages in Ubuntu also make it into Debian. I suspect we are
> under the assumtion that packages are
Am Samstag, den 04.06.2005, 23:50 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>
> > But the atmosphere in the thread is tense and full of misunderstandings.
> You are right here and I love if we could solve this.
Nice you say that. :)
> >
Hey Adeodato,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 04:29 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> but on the
> packaging side they work as closely as possible: common VCS repository
> and whatever.
This sounds really cool.
> specially for non-experienced packagers, doesn't help here
> either (correct me
Hey Andreas,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> What are the reasons for getting something easier into universe than
> sid according to your opinion?
Since we have no "package maintainers", but a big team of enthusiasts
trying to make as much cool things happen as po
Hi Andreas,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 09:17 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> My impression was that Ubuntu would directly derive
> from sid and universe would be kind of a sid mirror.
It's good to clarify some bits. In Ubuntu we have 4 repositories:
* main: the really really 18-months sup
Hi Stephen,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 10:49 +0100 schrieb Stephen Birch:
> How to report bugs. Do we really need to separate bug tracking
> mechanisms?
Some Debian maintainers were really unhappy about Ubuntu bugreports and
I do completly agree with them. Some packages are compiled against
dif
Hey Kevin,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 05:06 -0400 schrieb Kevin Mark:
> check out: http://debian.home.pipeline.com/ and look for the
> newdebian2.png for a somewhat accurate idea of how things work.
> Comments/questions welcomed.
After the first shudder at my end and the first daunting impressio
Hello Josselin,
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette:
> Oh, great. I forgot that Canonical's business model is to use Ubuntu as
> an upstaging area for Debian, so that we're always lagging behind. Will
> the next development decisions also be taken by some Canonical sta
Hello Florian,
Am Mittwoch, den 22.11.2006, 17:17 + schrieb Florian Ragwitz:
> jokosher (0.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release.
>* Update 10_desktop_file for 0.2.
>* Location of installed files changed slightly.
> + Modify debian/jokosher.sh and debian/jok
Am Donnerstag, den 23.11.2006, 07:45 +0100 schrieb Daniel Holbach:
> Hello Florian,
Sorry everybody. I woke up too early today to recognize the forced
Reply-To.
Have a nice day,
Daniel
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Hi Nikita,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2005, 02:04 +0400 schrieb Nikita V.
Youshchenko:
> For one of our internal projects, libxml++2.6 was too old.
> So I've created a package for libxml++2.10, using debian/ dir for the
> latest libxml++2.6 package.
I packaged it for Ubuntu - libxml++2.6 and libxm
Hi Nikita,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.07.2005, 12:04 +0400 schrieb Nikita V.
Youshchenko:
> > I talked to upstream and they
> > said, the ABI broke during the development unintentionally, but we
> > should better stick to libxml++2.6-2.10.0 and recompile the dependent
> > packages.
>
> Is 2.10 backwa
Hello,
On 17.10.2012 11:13, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2012/10/17 Hideki Yamane :
>> No, LP is good website for development with collaboration.
>
> Can I have my own LP, please?
https://dev.launchpad.net/Running should help you with that.
Have a great day,
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
26 matches
Mail list logo
