Re: Towards d-i wheezy beta 3

2012-09-09 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 10 September 2012 06:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > If anybody wants to see something land into this release, it would be > nice to mention it now instead of after the end of the merge window. Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude (following the same change in tasksel)

Re: Feedback on Debian 7.0

2013-06-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 June 2013 03:10, Russ Allbery wrote: > It would probably be a good idea for the installer to add commented-out > sources.list lines for the main archive, even if the installation is done > off-line. (Assuming that it doesn't, but Nikolas's experience seems to > indicate that it doesn't.) >

Detect if root login is disabled?

2011-12-07 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Hello I am looking at Bug#516854 and wondering: Is there a robust way for a *user* to detect if root login is disabled? Would like to perform such a check from an instance of aptitude running as a user account. I am aware of the following method which detects the `passwd -l' style lock, however

Re: Detect if root login is disabled?

2011-12-07 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Igor Pashev wrote: > su? su doesn't distinguish between a locked password and an incorrectly entered one. Would like to know the locked status before trying su so that the program can either fall back to sudo or give an error message more informative than just "incorrect password". -- To UNSU

dpkg, aptitude and use of state files (was: Re: Important information regarding upcoming dpkg 1.16.2 upload)

2012-03-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
TL;DR: aptitude does keep dpkg/status and apt/extended_states up-to-date with the *current* state of a package, just like other software. Please do not grok pkgstates to determine if something is installed, etc. On 18 March 2012 23:16, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell wrote: > Hi, I like ds

Re: Debian should move away from MD5 (and at best also from SHA1) (in secure APT and friends)

2012-10-18 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 19 October 2012 09:19, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > 1) Programs (I usually mean apt or aptitude here don't give exit > statuses != 0 in all cases when something critical has happened. The apt-utils are mostly ok at aborting with non-zero for critical errors. Aptitude is not. > e.g. apt-

Re: New virtual packages: lv2-plugin and lv2-host

2012-11-21 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 21 November 2012 22:51, Alessio Treglia wrote: > Actually I receive lots of mails from users asking me questions like "How > could > I find an exhaustive list of LV2 toys currently provided by Debian?", "Does > the > X sequencer support LV2 plugins?". So, I think we'd do a good service to our

Re: Adoption of Nix?

2013-02-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
Hello Just some quick notes related to this, without jumping in to the discussion (yet?). On 24 February 2013 01:28, John Moser wrote: > > Daniel Burrows debian.org> writes: > >> > > Note: I'm not subscribed to the list, and pulling this old thread through > Gmane; please CC directly to me. >

Re: Adoption of Nix?

2013-02-23 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 24 February 2013 08:56, John Moser wrote: > Right, and that's why I proposed manipulating Apt and Dpkg such that they > can understand and behave within a system with multiple installed versions > managed in various places. Thanks for clarifying so promptly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi

Re: needing sponsor for blt: am I at that stage?

2013-03-01 Thread Daniel Hartwig
On 2 March 2013 00:12, Paul Johnson wrote: > Hello, > > Its me again. Once again, I'm throwing myself on your mercy because > although I like programming and packaging, I am having a horrible time > finding my way through your web pages to adopt a package and keep it > up to date. > > So far I ha