e cron-job downloads of SpamDomains
and Spammers and SpamNets from my home web server makes my internet
connection very slow for most of every Sunday)
comments??
craig
--
craig sanders
on the boot disk. would be nice if it could be made to fit again. elvis
isn't as good as vim, but it's much better than ae.
craig
--
craig sanders
-tiny
needs 65K.
craig
--
craig sanders
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 01:48:03PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > someone (miquel, perhaps) made elvis-tiny a year or two back, and it fit
> > on the boot disk. would be nice if it could be made to fit again. elvis
> > isn'
On Fri, May 21, 1999 at 06:01:26PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> vi - hard to use, but small.
correction: hard to learn, easy to use. small, fast, and powerful.
craig
--
craig sanders
hich isn't
ae's fault...it's our fault for trying to make it do more than it can.
> ee is the right choice.
ee is better than ae, no doubt about it. however if there's 50+K
available on the rescue disk for ee it would be better to use that space
for a decent minimal vi clone (elvis-tiny needs ~67K).
craig
--
craig sanders
lvis-tiny needs ncurses now. again, i'm assuming it can be ported
to slang using slcurses.h. i made a start on this yesterday and cleared
up a few dozen trivial problems (elvis' own curses.h redefines many
slcurses.h macros) but ran into a problem with elvis' qfaddch macro
which requires more knowledge about curses than i currently have.
craig
--
craig sanders
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 07:54:57PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 09:47:33AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > that extra 30k (if it is actually available on the rescue disk) would be
> > better used either as part of the space needed by elvis-tiny (**) or by
&g
all the stuff i commonly use. i just want the bare minimum,
and that includes a decent editor.
craig
--
craig sanders
ulation is far from perfect, it should not
be removed until there is a replacement which can fit on the rescue
disk.
craig
--
craig sanders
when we can do so
would be absurdly laughable if it weren't so outrageously blinkered and
pedestrian.
> Anyway, every one knows that vi is primitive ;-)
i expected better of you than pointless cheap shots like this. guess i
was mistaken.
craig
--
craig sanders
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:40:48AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > and that includes a decent editor.
>
> That rules vi out, then.
for politeness' sake i will interpret your remarks in the most positive
light possible: you are mistaken.
craig
--
craig sanders
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 02:11:03AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 10:10:56AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > Are other editors really so difficult?
> >
> > yes. difficult and clumsy and lacking basic functionality.
>
> All that missing
#x27;source' format and
generate html or whatever else from that?
craig
--
craig sanders
t's shell?
craig
--
craig sanders
stinst/prerm scripts have been completely redesigned.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 07:18:09AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > do they automatically set up sash as root's shell?
>
> They don't touch the root account. Instead, they clone it as sashroot
> and set the she
301 - 316 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
