Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-flatdict
Version : 4.0.1
Upstream Contact: Gavin M. Roy
* URL : https://github.com/gmr/flatdict
* License : BSD-3-Clause
Programming Lang
chitecture-specific failures showing up
there. Some might go away with a few more retries I guess, but we'll
likely need to work out what to do about the rest. I haven't looked at
these in any depth.
Can anyone help with any of the remaining problems here? This would be
especially usefu
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 12:53:42PM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 01:58:14AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > [...]
> > * spyder: #1088068/#1089054.
>
> I'm struggling with this one; I've asked at
> https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issue
On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 01:58:14AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> While there are a few bits of that transition tracker still red, the
> current target is to work on the list of autopkgtest failures shown on
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults in order to get the
> additio
On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 03:04:13PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:41:28AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > But I'm thinking that, perhaps the best option is to ask upstream
> > directly, whether they are going to release a 2.1.x release soon, or
>
ews on locally-trained models, but I see no very
compelling need to find more things to spend energy on even if the costs
are lower.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
r
*_LDFLAGS variable is appropriate.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
target/root/.ssh; echo 'ssh-rsa
...' >/target/root/.ssh/authorized_keys
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
aven't been able
to observe any way in which it meaningfully affects either me or others,
so I'm not going to put energy into it when I could do something else
instead). To be told that this means I'm helping to stifle the use of
git in Debian is frankly infuriating and insulting.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
listic to expect
reviewers to only submit merge requests on Salsa in the general case
(outside of specific situations where you know that the maintaining team
uses Salsa actively for more than just git hosting). At least if you
file a bug then there's a good chance somebody will actually be told
can apply
> those accordingly.
I don't completely agree with the last part of this: I use git-dpm for
many packages and I leave MRs switched on anyway, even though it does
mean that sometimes I might need to do merges by hand. It's not ideal,
but it's OK. (I unders
but going one step further, NOT pushing upstream branches
> to the packaging repositories may help here as well.
Pushing upstream branches is only a problem if an upstream branch is set
as the default. Otherwise, it's helpful for various tools to have them
av
one.c", I
think it's probably been supported to some extent at least as far back
as git 1.5.6.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
does then we should pragmatically regard it only as an
indication of what tools that _create_ Debian packaging repositories
should do. Renaming branches is intrusive (it still typically requires
manual action from anyone who has an existing clone and wants to pull
changes!), and so there c
in bulk, the change is still
going to be disruptive to anyone who has a local clone of any of the
affected repositories at the moment. So maybe let's spend time on
something else instead.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
rap-and-sort after that package update, and wonder: What is it?
https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dh-debputy/debputy.1.en.html
https://people.debian.org/~nthykier/blog/2024/debian-packaging-with-style-black.html
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
gt;
> With tarballs the granularity of these tools is so much less.
This is a false dichotomy, though. It's perfectly possible to use both
in conjunction with each other, by importing a tarball on top of an
upstream git tag so that the differences between them are represented by
a git comm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-typing-inspection
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Contact: Victorien Plot
* URL : https://github.com/pydantic/typing-inspection
* License : MIT
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:40:42PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
Installed size of mawk is 263 MB which is really small for today's standards.
KB rather than MB, thankfully!
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-django-pgbulk
Version : 3.2.2
Upstream Contact: Wes Kendall
* URL : https://github.com/AmbitionEng/django-pgbulk
* License : BSD-3-clause
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Colin Watson
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-django-hashids
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Contact: Shen Li
* URL : https://github.com/ericls/django-hashids
* License : Expat
Programming
er than having to disentangle things later when several
different failures have all piled up into a big ball of mud.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 03:53:41PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu Feb 27, 2025 at 1:29 PM GMT, Colin Watson wrote:
And this in ~/.muttrc:
set text_flowed
That seems to work pretty well. I reflowed the parts of your
message that I quoted here to match.
If you happen to use
ir systems configured this way
makes me wonder what's going on. Does anyone know of documentation
somewhere that recommends configuring stable systems this way?
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
todo,
some kind of prioritization of which packages out of the huge pile are
worth paying more attention to than others is useful to me.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
> patched vulnerabilities or not.
But it doesn't. Santiago's using the data from the security tracker to
determine whether CVEs are open.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
message
that I quoted here to match.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
ing would most
likely converge.
I think this significantly underestimates the annoyance involved in
renaming existing long-lived branches (in that all clients have to
re-clone or manually adjust), which is certainly why I generally avoid
doing so unless I absolutely
before the url (we can all say how
bad gmail is, but that doesnt solve anything)
You can use the bts(1) command for that sort of thing.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
ly.
That said, making it easy for established users to hand out invitation
tokens seems pretty harmless from this point of view (although I don't
know how much effort it would be to build or maintain).
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
that debbugs doesn't just replay everyone's email addresses through to
mailing list archives.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
completely
inactive.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
installations. But I've
updated it there anyway.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
ldn't think of a reason not to.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 04:37:33PM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:00:05PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Do you really enjoy waiting 30 min for a bug to be created to get
a bug number?
I agree there are a number of problems with debbugs, but I don't
think
ed to it for a lot of
things a couple of years before I left. Let's just say that I am
extremely unenthusiastic about having to use it for hobby work as well.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
n a PostgreSQL port a while ago I infer that he probably
agrees with me on this.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 11:59:11AM +0200, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
Do we have a cli-tool whcih is an equivalent of apt source blabla=version, but
connected by default to snapshot ?
There's debsnap(1) in devscripts.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [
f how people
should respond to review.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
ectly, definitly more than once per months.
One possibility would be for the BTS to offer a way to follow up
privately, similar to the N-submitter@ addresses. (This idea would
obviously need refinement.)
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
bbugs very actively; I would
100% have switched to it.
--
Colin Watson (he/him) [cjwat...@debian.org]
1101 - 1141 of 1141 matches
Mail list logo
