On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:40:52PM +0300, The Illuminati wrote:
Listen up shitty ass spam bot. I'm really Gabe Newell and I can track your
fucking IP
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:04 PM, CHOICEHOMEWARRANTY <[1]a...@sigxcpu.org>
wrote:
[SPAM]
Does anyone on this list file "abuse@" reports,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 03:36:58PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
I think the best explanation is that the entire message ??? complaint and
quoted part ??? were composed and sent by the spammer themselves.
Oh, the "original" message is seperate, I just replied to a reply.
I can't find the original me
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 12:42:50PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
Christopher Clements writes:
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 03:36:58PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
>I think the best explanation is that the entire message ??? complaint and
>quoted part ??? were composed and sent by the spammer them
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 09:55:14AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Christopher Clements writes:
On closer examination, I think you are correct in saying that the
replies are written by the spammer as well.
On closer examination of what?
The "To:" field.
The headers of the m
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:26:00PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Christopher Clements writes:
On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 09:55:14AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Christopher Clements writes:
On closer examination, I think you are correct in saying that the
replies are written by the spammer as well
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 05:01:40PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
Christopher Clements writes:
...
That then provokes a small fraction of the victims to shout at us,
because they don't know ho to read headers.
That is what you are seeing.
Are you saying that these messages were not se
mailing
list and using them to forge spam.
The folks at debian-devel have no idea who is sending this spam, but the
orignal messages definitely didn't come from
.
Please don't sue Debian, as they are being framed for spam they never
actually sent.
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 1:20 AM, C
7 matches
Mail list logo
