Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: glastree
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Jeremy Wohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://igmus.org/code/
* License : public domain
Description : builds live backup trees, with branches for each day
The poor
> In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually most closely related pdumpfs. Like pdumpfs, glastree works
locally and not
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > operates?
> >
> > glastree provides a sub
> > > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> >
> > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> > it in the first place).
>
> How is that an advantage of use?
Well
> > Well, if one had a small system and desired not to install ruby, it
> > would still be possible to obtain pdumpfs' functionality. Of course
> > that could be called an installation issue rather than a usability
> > issue.
>
> 3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to sto
> > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > operates?
>
> Or storebackup?
>
> (Actually, storebackup's one-line description doesn't really hint at
> this functionality. But I'm using it to create
Does anyone know of an analog clock built on top of the Debian swirl?
Through a configuration error, I discovered the cool XMMS Debian theme,
and got to wishing that I had a bit more of a Debian feel to my desktop.
I love running an analog clock, and seeing it next to my new XMMS, I
couldn't help
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjgrapht-java
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Barak Naveh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jgrapht.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description :
> Seperate repositiories are already parallelized, which is what I think
> you are asking for here.
But if multiple URLs could satisfactorily serve requests for a single
repository, only one of them is currently used.
Ideally, the amount of parallelism could match the number of redundant
URLs pro
> * Package name: php-net-imap
> Version : 1.0.3
> Upstream Author : Damian Alejandro Fernandez Sosa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Net_IMAP
> * License : php license
You should be aware that per the current REJECT_FAQ [1]
your pac
> > >2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00066.html
>
> the project decision is clear IMHO : read the php license, you'll see it
> can only apply to the main and official PHP distribution.
Please read the message to debian-legal that I originally referenced. It
outlines recent
discussion and deal professionally with the upstream
authors of the current RC bugs related to the PHP License.
cheers,
Charles
-Original Message-
> From: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: PHP License for PHP Group packages
> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:41:33 -0500
> To
-Original Message-
> From: José Carlos do Nascimento Medeiros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: PHP License for PHP Group packages
> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:27:53 -0200
> To: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-legal@lists.debia
Hi,
I am an active user of the libhtml-mason-perl package, and am quite
interested in seeing it continue to progress in Debian.
Unfortunately, as outlined in my [1]message to debian-qa in January, the
package appears to have been abandoned, and all attempts to contact the
package maintainer have
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-pager
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Lorenzo Alberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Richard
Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-cache-lite
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Fabien Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Cache_Lite/
* License : LGPL
Descripti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcolt-java
Version :
Upstream Author : Wolfgang Hoschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dsd.lbl.gov/~hoschek/colt/
* License : BSD(ish) and LGPL
Prog
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjung-java
Version : 1.7.4
Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: J
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: courieruserinfo
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Andrew St. Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: courierpasswd
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Andrew St. Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-simpletest
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Marcus Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.lastcraft.com/simple_test.php
* License : The Open Grou
Hi,
I am currently working on bug #234048 to package Bouncy Castle Crypto, a
Java implementation of various cryptographic algorithms, for Debian. My
previous post about issues I have encountered went unanswered:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2005/07/msg3.html
My primary dilema is th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fortunes-bible
Version : 0.0.20020527/
Upstream Author : Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fortunebible.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
> This way, your package could go to main, which is a very good thing.
> Another approach would be to build the package with some jdk's (1.4 and
> 1.5 are enough) and add jdk14 and jdk15 to the binary name.
>
> Maybe you can have a look at libpg-java I think it builds several jars
> for different
> In the future, please try to find out if your package is part of some
> transition, in order not to interfere with it. The Release Team is
> also aware this information is not very easily accessible, and will
> think of ways of improving the situation.
First of all, I apologize for compl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xom
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xom.nu/
* License : LGPL
Description : tree-based API fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hibernate
Version : 3.0.5
Upstream Author : hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://www.hibernate.org/
* License : LGPL
Description : a object/rela
> Today my packages with PEAR modules was rejected from incoming queue.
> The reason is that PHP License was used for PEAR library.
>
> I've found many packages already existing in Debian archive which are
> licensed with PHP License. What does it mean? Should I fill bug reports
> with critical se
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00188.html
> >
> > Currently the Pear team claims to be "in the process of resolving this
> > situation" (see Pear request #5473).
>
> What does it mean? Is the problem already solved? Can I upload the packages?
No, it is not solved. To be sp
29 matches
Mail list logo
