Re: Maintaining kernel source in sarge

2003-05-18 Thread Brian May
s user-mode-linux builds by depending on "kernel-source-2.4.20" and automatically applying the UML patch, I wonder if the same thing could also be doine for -hppa and/or -ia64? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Debian conference in the US?

2003-05-19 Thread Brian Nelson
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What are other developers' feelings on the matter these days? > > If we're doing "let's have a conf where we normally don't" how about we > have it on the US's east coast aswell. I'd personally argue for the > nothern Virginia are myself. > > Too many con

Re: Accepted pointless 0.3-3 (i386 source)

2003-05-19 Thread Brian Nelson
reopen 193287 reopen 193286 thanks Marco Presi (Zufus) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 20:30:39 +0200 > Source: pointless > Binary: pointless > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 0.3-3 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Marco Presi (Zufus) <

Re: Firebird 0.6

2003-05-20 Thread Brian Nelson
Eric Dorland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Everyone, > > From the amount of mail I've gotten I guess people will be > interested. I've uploaded mozilla-firebird_0.6-1 to my personal apt > repository at http://people.debian.org/~eric/debian/. Just add: > > deb http://people.debian.org/~eric/debi

Re: Symlinking /usr/share/doc/ is not allowed

2003-05-20 Thread Brian May
h pointing out in this circumstance that I may want to install abc-doc even though abc is not installed or is a different version (eg. to see what the package is like before installing it). -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Accepted ptkei 1.18.0-4 (all source)

2003-05-21 Thread Brian Nelson
reopen 192068 thanks John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:40:18 +0100 > Source: ptkei > Binary: ptkei > Architecture: source all > Version: 1.18.0-4 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Changed

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-21 Thread Brian Nelson
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Format: 1.7 > Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:31:23 +0200 > Source: directory-administrator > Binary: directory-administrator > Architecture: source i386 > Version: 1.3.5-1 > Distribution: unstable > Urgency: low > Maintainer: Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Accepted ptkei 1.18.0-4 (all source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 21 May 2003 12:24:42 -0700, Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >> reopen 192068 thanks > >> John O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Guido Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote: >> > directory-administrator (1.3.5-1) unstable; urgency=low >> > . >> >* New Upstream Version (closes: #176227, #188308, #90276) >> >>

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> It's much more helpful to write this as: > > yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and > usefulness is :) > > At least I think it is not a good idea to tal

Re: Accepted directory-administrator 1.3.5-1 (i386 source)

2003-05-22 Thread Brian Nelson
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: >> * Francesco Paolo Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030522 21:35]: >> > Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs. >> > Do it using BTS directly. >> >> The developers r

problems upgrading stable libc6 to unstable libc6

2001-04-24 Thread Brian May
ou want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 80185 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libdb2-dev 2:2.4.14-2.7.7.1.c (using .../libdb2-dev_2%3a2.7.7-7_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libdb2-dev ... Setting up libdb2-dev (2.7.7-7) ... Any comments? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Base Bug Week, 30th April to 6th May

2001-04-25 Thread Brian May
ing else just yet (as I don't like upgrading to much stuff, partly because of the huge bandwidth required). Is this possible without manually copying&pasting from dselect? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Referring what kernel-images to build to the technical committee?

2001-04-27 Thread Brian May
have already booted Linux. However, if you are reading the installation instructions (as what Steve was saying), then you probably do not have a Linux system yet. Whats the point of finding out what the correct kernel is only after you have downloaded it? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

openldap question and possible feature conflict

2001-04-27 Thread Brian May
dap2 Build-depends: heimdal-dev, ... which doesn't look real good. Also Sam Hartman is going to scream "what about MIT Kerberos?" Sorry, that doesn't count ;-). (two versions of openldap2? arrgghhh!). -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: character sets

2001-04-27 Thread Brian May
>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> 1. use xemacs mule latin input mode. It doesn't work for Brian> me, have to try and find ou

Re: (OT) Storage (8*IDE HDs) any experiences?

2001-04-29 Thread Brian May
vices, I strongly suspect when designing IDE that they made the assumption it would only be used for the one power supply. Hence I wouldn't like to try it, unless I didn't care about reliability and/or potentially wrecking the hard disks. Even if it works today, will it work tomorrow? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Gnome bug 94684

2001-04-30 Thread Brian May
arison, the Debian maintainer probably already subscribes to the mailing lists, and has the upstream BTS book marked. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer

2001-04-30 Thread Brian May
Matt> interested in. The configuration should be trivial. ...but on a computer with a limited bandwidth (28.8kbps), pay per the megabyte download, this is simply not an option. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

imp broken in unstable?

2001-04-30 Thread Brian May
? Or do I conclude that imp in unstable is broken, and unusable in my given configuration? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer

2001-04-30 Thread Brian May
make master.debian.org my server, too. Just not as convenient (I would need to implement something, eg. fetchmail based for retrieving the mail.) One day, I need to investigate fetchmail, and how it works. Or that BSMTP stuff. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#95818: libpgsql2.1: should not depend on ident-server

2001-04-30 Thread Brian May
without* a reply; -S is different] This isn't something I like (read: hate), but I am bringing it up because it could be a serious security hole when used by programs like postgresql. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#95801: won't let me upgrade perl from stable to unstable

2001-04-30 Thread Brian May
D]> writes: Jason> On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Brian May wrote: >> WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed This >> should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing! >> perl-5.004-base (due to perl-base) Jason> I'm con

Re: Bug#95801: won't let me upgrade perl from stable to unstable

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
my bug report properly, especially when you say "dist-upgrade" will work, when I have given details in my last message as why it cannot work. Also you assume that the output from dpkg --print-avail is incorrect. I hope I have proved that it is correct, and yes, I do know what I am doing. However, I will reassign the bug to perl-base, seeing that is the package which seems to have started this mess. If the maintainers disagree with the problem, then they can argue with you. I have spent too long on this already. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

BTS feature?

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
will assume this bug has been fixed". I think it would be nice if this could get automated. Comments? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#95801: won't let me upgrade perl from stable to unstable

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
is not a bug (somewhere; anywhere) that I can't upgrade from stable to unstable I will ignore your messages. In the unlikely event that the perl maintainers get confused and don't fix the problem, somebody else will complain about it latter on. Then they can deal with the problems. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
n't I think of that? ;-) In the past, I seem to remember having problems when mail bounced after it was forwarded by procmail (I think I may have somehow created a mail loop with bounce messages somehow creating more bounce messages; I can't remember the details now). I will have to watch out for that. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#95801: won't let me upgrade perl from stable to unstable

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
ad installed. Jason may even be correct when he said it was not a problem with apt. I am not going to argue where the problem lies, but just think it should get fixed. My apt, at the time, however was 0.5.0 (or possibly 0.5.3). -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: debbugs can now send bug mails to someone different than the maintainer

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
. I would have though that fetchmail-ssl would be quite OK. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: BTS feature?

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
t;, but without having to manually keep track of 30 days if he doesn't get any response. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: postgresql and libssl - Bug#95146

2001-05-01 Thread Brian Ristuccia
f current policy dictates that PostgreSQL as it currently stands needs to go in non-us, then that's where you should put it. Policy that requires packages depending on packages in non-us also be in non-us will not change even if the current legal inquiry finds that not all crypto containing uploa

Re: upgrading only urgency=high packages

2001-05-01 Thread Brian May
ackages being incompatible with the Hurd. The biggest problem could be the load imposed by "apt-get upgrade" or "apt-get dist-upgrade" or "dselect", I am not sure how these should be done. Automatically extract the data according to some preset criteria and put it in a number of compressed Packages file? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: imp broken in unstable?

2001-05-02 Thread Brian May
nto postgresql and of Petr> course fails I guess that part is not important then, and I need to focus on the first line. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: upgrading only urgency=high packages

2001-05-02 Thread Brian May
es themselves. Matt> This would be a scalability problem if such a system were to Matt> become popular. Judging by the response that Matt> apt-listchanges received, and the interest people have in Matt> the idea, it just might. What about a distributed database, eg. ope

netscape in unstable and mouse capture

2001-05-06 Thread Brian May
ect of kill -9?) Is there anyway of resolving this situation without killing the X server? Sorry, I am currently typing blind, as this window is hidden by another window, and I can't change it, so lets see how it comes out -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Caching Proxy for apt-get via http?

2001-05-06 Thread Brian May
esh_pattern Sources.gz$ 720 100%720 to try and eliminate this problem. Seems to work fine. So far... -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: netscape in unstable and mouse capture

2001-05-06 Thread Brian May
ompletely hidden... Ooops. Perhaps I shouldn't have said that . -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#95975: mutt: doesn't use charset anymore

2001-05-06 Thread Brian May
files. After all, the leading . is not defined by the language being used, rather it is a hack used by many user level programs that consider the file a "hidden" file. (sorry if I missed the point of all of this) -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: support for older distributions

2001-05-08 Thread Brian May
ke testing, only based around stable, not unstable. Pitfalls: Of course, it goes without saying, that you can't copy the new package into the new distribution until all dependencies have already been satisfied. Including libc6 + libc6 related packages. Also, I have not considered multiple arc

Re: support for older distributions

2001-05-08 Thread Brian May
field to help the BTS tracking of packages somehow, but I haven't thought too much of this aspect. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Questions to testing/unstable

2001-05-08 Thread Brian May
ich I found in the CVS version; I still need to test it though). -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: support for older distributions

2001-05-09 Thread Brian May
uation of having many different apt repositories, each with different selections of packages compiled for stable, you would have one big repository that could be used by everyone. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: support for older distributions

2001-05-09 Thread Brian May
test the package. But installing a new version of libc6 on a stable system has the potential for breaking the whole system. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: how can Euro symbol be displayed under X [4.0.3]?

2001-05-09 Thread Brian May
looking at the right character?) However, xemacs-mule doesn't seem to support anything greater then ISO-8859-9, so it looks like I am out of luck here. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: step by step HOWTO switch debian installation into utf-8

2001-09-03 Thread Brian May
t versions of English - in the configuration screen see a list of "default" locales, and select en_UK, but en_UK is not a valid locale. I believe it should be en_GB. - in the configuration screen manually type "en_GB", but this doesn't seem to do anything. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: How many people need locales?

2001-09-03 Thread Brian May
dates in MM/DD/ format. - unless of course you have changed the locale... Very confusing too. Took me ages to work out why dates like 28/5/2001 were getting interpreted as text strings, and not as dates. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

isync vs mailsync

2001-09-03 Thread Brian May
uration. I have filed bug reports on both programs, and supplied a patch to mailsync. - limited documentation. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
Thats what I thought, too. I really missed things up when I moved messages on the client. They ended up appearing in both groups at once. Fortunately, a side affect of these problems meant that the server hadn't been missed up. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
erbose mode in isync): \Recent == new message == old unread \Seen == read Hmmm... -v is meant to "Show IMAP chatter" but it doesn't. Do I smell another bug in mailsync? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: step by step HOWTO switch debian installation into utf-8

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
ks. doesn't look like it to me: [503] [pluto:bam] ~ >LANG=en_AU:en_GB dia Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library [504] [pluto:bam] ~ >LANG=en_GB dia [505] [pluto:bam] ~ >LANG=en_GB dia [505] [pluto:bam] ~ >LANG=en_AU dia [506] [pluto:bam] ~ >LANG=en_GB dia -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: step by step HOWTO switch debian installation into utf-8

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
>>>>> "Marek" == Marek Habersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marek> Or just put LANG=en_GB in /etc/environment Hmmm. Might be worth trying. However, either this is going to override the language chosen by gdm, or gdm is going to override this. Not an ide

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
>>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In my search for a "perfect" offline IMAP client(TM) I have >> looked at isync vs mailsync. Colin> What

Hello

2001-09-04 Thread Brian Elias
by decrease our percent of profits. Just click the link below to set up an appointment with one of my sales representatives today! Just point your browser at www.inetwindows2k.com Brian Elias President Hansons Windows & Siding P. S. This a one time email offer only good for the next

Re: Date format (was: How many people need locales?)

2001-09-04 Thread Brian May
as a string. If the user really does want a string (seems unlikely), he/she can quote the value. The error/warning message should indicate that the user can change the format by changing the locale. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Colin> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> In my search for a "perfect" offline IMAP client(TM) I ha

Re: step by step HOWTO switch debian installation into utf-8

2001-09-05 Thread Brian May
library Vociferous> From another message (in one of the numerous Vociferous> "translated descriptions" threads), you can set Vociferous> LANGUAGES=en_AU:en_GB, and it will do fallback. Are you sure? As far as I can tell, the value of LANGUAGES is totally ignored. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-05 Thread Brian May
>>>>> "Marcelo" == Marcelo E Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Despite these problems, Gnus is the only program I have seen >> that will highlight replies to my mail, something I

Re: step by step HOWTO switch debian installation into utf-8

2001-09-05 Thread Brian May
rmation. [783] [scrooge:bam] /usr/doc/libsasl-dev >LANGUAGE=en_GB ls --sss ls: unrecognized option `--sss' Try `ls --help' for more information. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: funny idle time from time

2001-09-06 Thread Brian May
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:13:00PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:12:46PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 11:35:05AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > > > Also, if a computer is running slowly, but top says the CPU has plenty > >

Re: isync vs mailsync

2001-09-07 Thread Brian May
at I have seen it is very good. It is just a pity that gnus won't install at the same time. I tried chaos instead, but couldn't get imap to work :-( -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#111658: RFA: knapster2 -- KDE Napster client

2001-09-08 Thread Brian Russo
Package: wnpp I don't use napster anymore, hence I have no interest in knapster2. It's not terribly difficult to maintain, single binary and all. I would simply prefer to focus on some of my other packages. P.S. upstream doesn't like to clean up his tarballs properly.

Re: Bug#112020: ITP: keychain -- An OpenSSH key manager

2001-09-13 Thread Brian Sniffen
helps them do their jobs. * Tell everyone the passphrase. Same problem. -Brian Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 07:08:32PM -0500, Cesar Mendoza wrote: > > I find the package useful and I'm also aware of the shortcomings of >> ssh-agent

Re: Purposely broken/uninstallable packages in archive

2001-09-20 Thread Brian May
nstead gave up maintainership of the package, since I no longer have time to play around with diskless systems. Anyway, I hope this helps explain the situation a bit better. It is now up to Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (the new maintainer) to answer the ifs, whats, whens, and whys about dealing with this bug report. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#66135: libtool_1.3.5-1(unstable): wrapping of binaries fails with -D__LIBTOOL_IS_A_FOOL__

2001-09-21 Thread Brian May
ause of debian/rules which continue to use an obsolete (and no longer required) hack in order to remove unwanted -rpaths. Just remove the hack, it is no longer required. It no longer serves any useful function either. For more details read the bug report. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#66135: libtool_1.3.5-1(unstable): wrapping of binaries fails with -D__LIBTOOL_IS_A_FOOL__

2001-09-22 Thread Brian May
the initial bug report for a general idea, do any packages still fall into this category?) -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
Duly chastined. :) I discovered a few minutes ago (thanks to a friend that is d-d) that I can in fact join the debian-devel list. So I am now lurking to read and reply. :) I'll reply in a few minutes to the other email. :) Brian

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
at worst IMHO. > > > Have a nice (redhat|mandrake|windowsXP) day > > Pf Ack! EVIL! It's still Debian Woody for me. :) I'm not giving up just yet. -- Brian Wolfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Down to earth computing!" TerraBox.comFingerprint: 2849 5090 D4E0 2A6C C648 A750 52F8 8504 67DB 205C

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
s in Debian, not packagers that go > their merry way leaving the distro littered with outdated and often broken > crap. Aye, and I as a user will wave my Clue Bat(tm) as forcefully as required and as frequently as required at developer heads that I have contact with that don&#x

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
art. > > > Have a nice (redhat|mandrake|windowsXP) day > > > > Not even worth more than this snicker. > > > > OK, I'm getting in on this one, regardless of opinions. Sorry, but I > have to agree with Brian here. > > OK, my little history to

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 01:43:53PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 01:57:17AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > As debian "caught up" on versions, CDRToaster became > > increasingly buggy. The last modification that I saw to it over > > a year ago was to let it s

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
It's a normal bug at the minimal. I couldn't get CDRToaster to even do a simple burn of a single directory! So I think the bug description would be more like "CDRToaster has failed to follow the evolution of mkisofs's command line parameters. As a result many fetures that CDRToaster purp

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
Ok, here is something to look at. How many NEW packages are there in the last 2 months? How many of them could have been saved for later due to an alternate allready existing? How many don't add a whole lot of value to debian? Instead of many new packages, why not make people pic

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-26 Thread Brian Wolfe
l/fringe stuff thats poping up) On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:22:42PM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 03:49:11PM -0600, Brian Wolfe wrote: > > Instead of many new packages, why not make people pick up the orphaned > > stuff, and find replacements or adopt p

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-27 Thread Brian Wolfe
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 11:07:20PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote: > On 26 Dec 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > > Um, if it doesn't work for the version of mkisofs in woody, then it is > > a critical bug as far as woody is concerned. > > That may be true. But someone who has potato installed, and

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-27 Thread Brian Wolfe
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:24:06PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 04:14:46PM +0200, Juha J?ykk? wrote: > > > I wonder how this could happen in the first place: if CDRToaster > > depended properly on mkisofs version <= whatever, then upgrading > > mkisofs should remove CDRToas

Re: An alarming trend (no it's not flaimbait.) (fwd)

2001-12-28 Thread Brian Wolfe
breaks too frequesntly. :) On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 08:09:54AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Wolfe) writes: > > > Actualy, I believe that the mkisofs maintainer should have seen that a > > new option was created and notified the maintainers of anything t

Re: BitKeeper

2002-01-03 Thread Brian Ristuccia
t interested in packaging it at this > time, but I might file an RFP unless someone knows of a reason why it can't > be packaged for non-free. > > [0] http://www.bitkeeper.com/Sales.Licensing.Source.html > It's probably OK for non-free. -- Brian Ristuccia [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New project: Debian-Med

2002-01-07 Thread Brian Bray
h care field needs a distribution that's focused more on stability and reliability than on the latest and greatest features. The thousands of Debian volunteers have an established track record in producing a great distribution with "the right stuff". -Brian -- Brian Bray Minoru Dev

lock files in /home???

2002-01-09 Thread Brian May
mounted with file locking disabled, hence the file locking operation fails. This in turn causes gconfd to fail, which in turn causes Nautils to fail. Is it really required to have file locks under $HOME? Wouldn't, say /tmp be more appropriate? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: pcmcia-modules in woody

2002-01-15 Thread Brian Mays
h to also build a new pcmcia-modules package to accompany a new version of their packages. That certainly helps. - Brian

Re: Debbugs and ACK messages

2002-04-03 Thread Brian May
ior it has now. How would you combine flags? eg. -done and -nonverbose or -forward and -nonverbose, etc. (or is that -forwarded?) -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"mutt -y" speed

2002-04-04 Thread Brian May
ver, I can't see any evidence that the LDAP server (localhost) is slowing down. I have tried restarting the LDAP server, but this doesn't help. ANy ideas? Thanks in advance. (sorry about the rushed E-Mail) -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: "mutt -y" speed

2002-04-04 Thread Brian May
14720 1776 ?S12:13 0:00 /usr/sbin/nscd root 16860 0.0 1.4 14720 1776 ?S12:13 0:00 /usr/sbin/nscd bam 16923 0.0 0.4 1616 584 pts/1S12:16 0:00 grep nscd -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Bug#141748: ITP: openca -- Open Source Certification Authority

2002-04-08 Thread Brian May
Package: wnpp Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-08 Severity: wishlist * Package name: openca Version : 0.8.1 Upstream Author : Multiple; see website. * URL : http://www.OpenCA.org/ * License : "Apache-style" license Description : Open Source Certification Aut

Re: O: gnu-standards -- GNU coding standards

2002-04-08 Thread Brian May
C printf statement? Would it still meet the DFSG? Also, it is worth noting that even the GPL doesn't allow unrestricted editing of source files: a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices stating that you changed the files and the date of any change. -- Brian M

Re: creating package.substvars

2002-04-08 Thread Brian May
ed depends is the the same for every generated package. (although you it may not be appropriate for the -dev package) The debian-mentors mailing list might be better for this type of package. errr... I mean for this type of question. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

bootstrapping build process?

2002-04-09 Thread Brian May
hoping that this could be bypassed though, by telling the autobuilders to initially resolve the dependancy for heimdal when building kerberos4tkth from non-us/testing. Is this possible? Any comments? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: Bug#141847: O: dupload -- Utility to upload Debian packages.

2002-04-11 Thread Brian May
ase leave language flame wars out of discussion - we all know that is the best language). Thanks. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: rsync and debian -- summary of issues

2002-04-11 Thread Brian May
ly > will be useful. > > http://rsync.samba.org/rsync-and-debian/ > > I'd appreciate comments. I think some more details is required regarding rproxy. Why is nobody actively developing it? AFAIK, it solves all the problems regarding server load discussed in rsync, doesn't it??

Re: Bug#141847: O: dupload -- Utility to upload Debian packages.

2002-04-12 Thread Brian May
. How does it determine the archive? It might be useful if it could automatically determine that some packages should get uploaded to my private archive (because they can't go in Debian yet for various reasons), and other packages go to ftp-master. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

Re: rsync and debian -- summary of issues

2002-04-12 Thread Brian May
) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) /usr/sbin/rproxy: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped I believe it has been statically linked with libhsync. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- T

Re: rsync and debian -- summary of issues

2002-04-12 Thread Brian May
imize the load on the server. Perhaps I am mistaken? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#141748: ITP: openca -- Open Source Certification Authority

2002-04-17 Thread Brian May
. Anyway, I can't package it yet, not until the next (unreleased) version of openssl suddenly appears in Debian. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-18 Thread Brian May
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 07:25:31PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I didn't go anywhere. Nowhere in my platform did I claim I wasn't evil. > ;-) Damm! Too late to vote for you now... -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again

2002-04-18 Thread Brian May
bers. ;-) (knew there had to be a good reason). -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Technical Committee: decision on #119517?

2002-04-19 Thread Brian Mays
Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > As Brian has made it clear that he does not wish to follow either > suggestion made by Dale Scheetz (splitting the package or changing the > Depends:) to ensure all executables supplied in the package run as > expected, ... While I have stated that I do not l

Re: Whoos with GnuTLS and md5-signed certificates

2009-02-14 Thread Brian May
o see #514578. -- Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Whoos with GnuTLS and md5-signed certificates

2009-02-15 Thread Brian May
etc, Lenny users will still be vulnerable even if GnuTLS is fixed. The sooner MD5 certificates (not counting explicitly trusted self signed certificates here) are disabled everywhere the better, IMHO. Yes, this may break stuff. Unfortunately. -- Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Re: Refactoring the Debtags web interface

2009-02-23 Thread Brian May
8/22/the-problems-with-openid/>, unfortunately the domain appears to be off-line now, and the archive at <http://web.archive.org/web/20080208023407/http://idcorner.org/2007/08/22/the-problems-with-openid/> is difficult to read due to bad formatting. -- Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: Refactoring the Debtags web interface

2009-02-23 Thread Brian May
b browser client support (e.g. Kerberos or something like Kerberos). -- Brian May -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >