Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, bdr...@debian.org
* Package name: git-ubuntu
Version : 1.1
Upstream Contact: ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
* URL : https://launchpad.net/git-ubuntu
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: promoe
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Thomas Frauendorfer
* URL : http://wiki.xmms2.xmms.se/wiki/Client:Promoe
* License : GPL v2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : gui client
Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 16:09 +0200 schrieb Sandro Tosi:
> Ideally, I'd imaging nnn...@b.d.o to reach
>
> - submitter
> - maintainers
> - subscribers
>
> We already have -quite if we want to not mail people.
>
> Do others feel we should enable emailing the submitter by default?
Yes, plea
Am Sonntag, den 13.09.2009, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Jon Dowland:
> Most of the examples given in DEP-5 containing the path
> character will not work, either, e.g.
>
> Files: debian/*
>
> Assuming they are passed into a find(1) invocation like so
>
> find . -path 'debian/*'
>
> (note the pre
be dropped. "no" or "not-yet" would indicate that the patch
was not applied yet. If the patch was applied, it could contain the
revision (like "r4681") or a link to the VCS commit.
What do you think about my suggestion?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.u
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 08:42 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches
if
> > they were accepted by upstream or not. I have to check each patch if
I
>
Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches if
> > they were accepted by upstream or not. I have to check each patch if I
Hi,
I got some FTBFS with binutils-gold bug reports. How can I build my
packages using binutils-gold? What do I have to change for that?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: release
Version : 0.1 (native)
Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung
* License : GPL v3+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : provides information about the current releases
This package
s. This would be
> ideal.
> I'd just do find . -name "*.jar" -exec rm {} \;
>
> But also a patch which contains just the names of the files to be removed and
> not the whole content would suffice.
Putting 'find . -name "*.jar" -delete' in you
Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >
> > * Package name: release
>
> The tool isn't about releasing, but about to querying the release. Also,
> it's about distribution
Am Mittwoch, den 09.12.2009, 09:34 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 07.12.2009, 09:03 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
> >> On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 00:14 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >> > For Debian I
preferences, suggestions, or objections?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2009, 09:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Lin PIAT:
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 00:09 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > To sum up the naming discussion, there are two possible package names:
> >
> > * distro-release-info
> > * release-info
> >
> >
Am Freitag, den 11.12.2009, 15:57 -0600 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> [Benjamin Drung]
> > Yes, the name is a bit to generic. Any other suggestions for the name?
> > On the mailing list I found 'release-info'. On my list are now:
> >
> > * release-info
> >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: jdownloader
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : JDownloader DEV-Team
* URL : http://jdownloader.org/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Java
Description : download manager for one
the
desktop file. Then you have a desktop icon, but you cannot launch the
application.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
ipts, the extension will enhance the supported
xulrunner apps and provide xulapt-extname. In the case of
xul-ext-quotecolors, it will enhance icedove and provide
icedove-quotecolors. So are still able to run "apt-get install
icedove-quotecolors" or "apt-get install iceweasel-ad
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 15:48 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Thilo Six wrote:
> > Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34
> >> icedove-quotecolors
> >
> > 2nd question:
> > In the good old days (when ever thes
2010/2/2 Mike Hommey :
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
>>
>> Source package name
>> ===
>>
>> The source package na
that plugins that do not use that interface adopt it forthwith.
> :-)
npapi- prefix is not very user friendly. It reminds me of the PCMCIA
card. xul-plugin- sounds better, but do not fit. The least evil proposal
was to append -browserplugin. Better suggestions are welcome.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubun
ges? What's the opinion of the
> affected packages' maintainers?
We should gather more opinions, especially from the affected packages'
maintainers.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
rganization that uses its own tools.
>
> You seriously don't want to force dak upon everyone. And there is not
> even a package. (And the same is true for wanna-build, sadly.)
Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
such packages?
--
Benjamin Dru
Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 17:57 +0100 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
> Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Why is there no dak and wanna-build package? Are there plans to create
> > such packages?
>
> Have you ever tried to install dak?
No.
> If you have, the
> latest version.
That explains why fatsort is gone. Thanks for the info.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
u just call autoreconf, the changes end up in the diff;
> > and this is not what we want.
> >
>
> I do use autoreconf and I don't have these changes in my diff.
>
> IMO, a backup/restore script (where you specify the list of files to
> backup) may be more useful. I
s with internal structure; the format of
> > Origin is not dissimilar to what we need here. How about something like
> > the following?
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, it looks good so I applied it.
Thanks.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer
hat should we do?
I think we should start using the new naming policy to add the
-browserplugin suffix.
There were some votes for -browserplugin and none against it. No better
name was proposed. Therefore I think that it was decided.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 23:51 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> On dim., 2010-04-25 at 18:58 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > What should we do?
> >
> > I think we should start using the new naming policy to add the
> > -browserplugin suffix.
>
*-browserplugin
4. *-browser-plugin
I think all of these would work (with a slight preference to 1. or 2.).
Opinions?
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 18:49 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > I'm sure you meant "browser-plugin-*" here ...
> > Hm, browserplugin-* would be a new option. Then we would have
> >
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 20:40 +0200 schrieb Benjamin Drung:
> Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 18:49 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 04:56:15PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > > I'm sure you meant "browser-plugin-*" here ...
>
Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 23:58 +0200 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> "Hans-J. Ullrich" writes:
>
> > Am Montag, 26. April 2010 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> >> Benjamin Drung writes:
> >> > Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Stefano Zac
Am Dienstag, den 27.04.2010, 10:02 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 08:40:41PM +0200, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
> >
> > I setup a doodle poll
>
> Dear Benjamin,
>
> I would like to recommend http://selectricity.org/ instead. In contrary to
>
t; PS I am not on the mailing list, so please remember to cc me. Thanks.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
was writing something for a 32-bit machine with SSE2 instruction
> set, what would be the most appropriate architecture name?
The best solution would be autodetection of SSE2 on runtime. That can be
done with a few lines of code.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Mainta
Hi,
after some days the poll [1] has been a clear result. browser-plugin-*
has won with a huge winning margin.
[1] http://www.doodle.com/guafbbhipwskzr8a
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital
//popcon.ubuntu.com/stat/sub-i386.png
>
> Is it enabled by default without asking the user? (I didn't do an ubuntu
> install since warty or hoary so I wouldn't know)
No. You have to enable it in a submenu.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintaine
art though.
Debian contributors don't have to be Debian users at the beginning. They
can come from Debian-derived distributions and contribute directly to
Debian to avoid work duplication.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Am Montag, den 26.07.2010, 10:30 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 22.07.2010, 10:20 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> > > On 21/07/2010 10:25, Paul Wise wrote:
> > > > They also cu
Am Freitag, den 30.07.2010, 14:24 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > > I could not find that "submenu" while installing 10.04. It's quite
> > > possibly only in the alternate installer image nowadays (that is use
y, but I cannot
> remember what it was -- maybe it doesn't exist anymore.
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
There you can search the contents of packages.
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 14:38 -0400 schrieb Michael Hanke:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:33:54PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 30.09.2010, 14:31 -0400 schrieb Michael Hanke:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I want to determine in what De
ctions?
You probably want to use mozilla-devscripts to package it. Look at the
wiki page [1] and look how other XUL extensions (e.g. adblock-plus) are
packaged.
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/mozilla-devscripts
--
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: ocs
Version : 2.3n
Upstream Author : Opal Group, TU Berlin
* URL : https://projects.uebb.tu-berlin.de/opal/
* License : GPL, LGPL (will probably change)
Programming Lang: C, Opal
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: libkibi
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Benjamin Drung
* URL : https://launchpad.net/libkibi
* License : ISC
Programming Lang: C
Description : library for byte prefixes
This
ample
wrap-and-sort could format it nicely. Having some glue code for
software-center would be nice. Third idea is to write a checker tool
that compares debian/copyright with the file headers (licensecheck
output).
The Files field contains a space separated files list. What to do if the
file name contains a space? How should this space escaped?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: portsmf
Version : 0.1~svn20101010
Upstream Author : Roger B. Dannenberg
* URL : http://portmedia.sourceforge.net/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Portable
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: libsbsms
Version : 1.7.0
Upstream Author : Clayton Otey
* URL : http://sbsms.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Subband Sinusoidal Modeling
rchitectures, and I'm hesitating, now.
>
> So, fellow developers, what do you think?
I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in
unstable and push the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push 4.0 to
unstable when it's out.
Then we have one big break and a tested 4.0 in unstable.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
gt; > lead to some noise in the short term but are convinced that the longer
> > term advantages make this worthwhile.
> >
> Did you do an archive check with the new lintian and diff'ed it against
> a check with previous lintian?
Please do a complete archive check on li
patches waiting to be reviewed. What can be
done to improve this number?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > 1. ubuntu-dev-tools contains a bunch of scripts. Some of them are useful
> > only for Ubuntu, but some of them are general usable for packaging.
> &
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 16:42 + schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Benjamin Drung writes ("new scripts and patches for devscripts"):
> > 1. ubuntu-dev-tools contains a bunch of scripts. Some of them are useful
> > only for Ubuntu, but some of them are general usable for pac
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 + schrieb Roger Leigh:
> >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >> > Should
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 22:28 + schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Benjamin Drung writes ("Re: new scripts and patches for devscripts"):
> > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 16:42 + schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > > > add-patch
> > > > check-symbols
> &g
t; language issue should probably be a decision within the devscripts team,
> together with the script proposers.
Can we continue to discuss the language issue on debian-devel or should
we move the discussion somewhere else?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I was sucked in the ubuntu-dev-tools maintenance due to one script that
I wrote. I assume that may happen with devscripts too.
> Last we spoke, he wasn't comfortable with Perl,
> so while they may support their scripts within devscripts, how much does
> it really buy for the devscripts p
Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 18:32 +0100 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
> On 08/03/2011 23:01, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >
> > check-symbols
>
> I always hated programs that do "sudo" (and even more those doing it
> *twice*). And, isn't just unpacking the .deb and
s part of my experience). Usually, making authors switch from
> the almost automatic "All rights reserved" motto to GPL (or similar)
> is not unfeasible.
Do we have a wiki page or similar containing this information? It would
be nice to have a page for guiding people (that are unawar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: pyapi-gitlab
Version : 6.2.3
Upstream Author : Itxaka Serrano Garcia
* URL : https://github.com/Itxaka/pyapi-gitlab
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: graypy
Version : 0.2.11
Upstream Author : Sever Băneşiu
* URL : https://github.com/severb/graypy
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python logging handler that
een quickly reached and the announced [10]
> change is now imminent. Thanks to Carsten Hey and Gerfried Fuchs for
> their help in figuring out the details of the last discussion on the
> matter and DSA for their feedback.
>
> [10] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce
ss several
> architectures (useful for transitions)
> * query: query packages using their metadata (similar to grep-dctrl,
> but uses a dedicated query language)
> * tracker: frontend to multiple monitors
What does ben stand for? Is this just a short name for me? ;)
Would it b
fixed now.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
t; several interpreted languages in our mime.types
>
> text/x-perl
> text/x-python
> text/x-tcl
> text/x-sh
> text/x-java
> text/x-haskell
> [...]
Java and Haskell are compiled, but not interpreted languages.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.a
Am Dienstag, den 14.05.2013, 20:35 +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 13.05.2013, 21:06 +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> > > This may be still buggy and may needs some more work. I was thinki
havior All I
> read is:"Mimimimimi!" in ALL directions.
Ondřej Surý is not spamming. He raises an important issue. Insults and
disrespectful behavior on debian-devel are not welcome. There is no
excuse for such behavior. You might have a thick skin and disagree, but
not everyone is happy
; are the packages that either build-depend (94) or depend (2) on
> texi2html.
Have you checked indirect build-dependencies on texi2html (e.g. the
package build depends on foo, which depends on texi2html)?
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
a-devscripts
> If it wasn't too hard I'd be happy to maintain xul-ext-lazarus, for example.
It is simple in most cases. You often just repack the .xpi file.
Do you mean "Lazarus: Form Recovery" with xul-ext-lazarus [my first
connection was the Lazarus IDE for Pascal]? This e
> built failed "accidentally" and needs to be restarted, or it requires
> some fixing and uploading new version. It will save time for both DDs
> and wb-team.
+1
In Ubuntu, developers can restart builds on failing archs (via
Launchpad) for package that they can upload. I used
we could have 0-day long freezes and could drop testing
completely. :)
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1370472907.12617.45.camel@deep-thought
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: droopy
Version : 20120108
Upstream Author : Pierre Duquesne
* URL : http://stackp.online.fr/droopy
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: Python
Description : mini web server
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: pyhunspell
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Sayamindu Dasgupta
* URL : https://code.google.com/p/pyhunspell/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : Python 2/3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: adblockedge (binary: xul-ext-adblock-edge)
Version : 2.0.4
Upstream Author : adstomper
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/adstomper/adblockedge/
* License : MPL-2.0
Programming Lang
patch might make more sense in devscripts, but devscripts I think
> has the same set of constraints, albeit with different base languages.
> Python and Perl at the moment, I think.)
devscript had only Perl and Shell scripts initially, but then gained
Python scripts. I don't see any
n the same date, you can append .2 (0~MMDD.2).
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1381869150.2681.3.camel@erde
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: lxmms2
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Johannes Heimansberg
* URL : http://wejp.k.vu/projects/xmms2/lxmms2
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : control XMMS2 with
> If integration with PTS is planned (and or if you're using
> ubuntu-distro-info) perhaps python would make sense as a language
> choice.
ubuntu-distro-info is implemented in Haskell (since version 0.3) and has
an Python and Perl library.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
e: "foo/file one.bar"
License: ISC
File: foo/file_one.bar
License: GPL
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:20 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
>
> > DEP-5 is nice, but how can I specify a license for a file with white
> > spaces? For example you want to specify that the file "foo/file one.bar"
> > is licensed un
th a tab.
>
> >The general way to specify information for a file name that contains
> >whitespace is to use wildcards to match the whitespace,
>
> That works only if you can stand ugliness of such Files fields.
True words.
For example, the eclipse source package has files with spa
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
>
> > Is it to complex to have a syntax that is similar to what the shell
> > does? Two solutions pop into my mind. Please let me know, why these are
> > not use. You can point me
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:56 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2012, 14:49 -0800 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> >> Yeah, both of those were among the other syntax proposals that were
> >> suggested, and I think one of t
lan project.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Benjamin Drung
* Package name: npapi-vlc
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : VLC media player developers
* URL : http://git.videolan.org/?p=npapi-vlc.git
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C++
Description
ople will suggest you follow the LTS upgrade
> path, which is very similar to Debian Stable's.
Since Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, the LTS versions are supported for five years on
the desktop, too.
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the Debian developer and not just by the
maintainer of packaging-dev or one single bug reporter. Therefore I am
asking you: How popular are bzr-builddeb and dh-make? Should they be
recommended or just suggested by packaging-dev?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/688572
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ub
mmend none of them :-)
> Cheers,
>Matthias
>
> 2012/10/11 Benjamin Drung :
> > Hi,
> >
> > How popular are bzr-builddeb and dh-make in Debian? The current
> > situation is that packaging-dev recommends bzr-builddeb and suggests
> > dh-make. It was reque
Am Donnerstag, den 11.10.2012, 14:38 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:38:08PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > How popular are bzr-builddeb and dh-make in Debian? The current
> > situation is that packaging-dev recommends bzr-buildde
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 00:00 +0200 schrieb Vincent Bernat:
> ❦ 11 octobre 2012 22:33 CEST, Benjamin Drung :
>
> >> > I can confirm the trend for a couple of organisations. The primary
> >> > reason that I identified was the retirement of security support f
Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 10:04 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:35 AM, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>
> > A poll is a good idea. Can you recommend a site that allows setting up a
> > poll?
>
> The Debian secretary was at one point going to setup devotee
depend on Launchpad? bzr is integrated into
Launchpad, but you can use bzr without Launchpad as every other DVCS.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
) one of the above options.
What will I do?
Am Samstag, den 13.10.2012, 00:10 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy:
> Le Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:06:11PM +0200, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
> > Am Freitag, den 12.10.2012, 10:04 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
> >
> > https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden
I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading
the announce mail about it.
--
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 20:35 + schrieb Jon Dowland:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:29:02PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Hm, I filed two unblock requests after that deadline, but before reading
> > the announce mail about it.
>
> You don't state whether th
e for general purpose programs.
> Well, plum is an acronym for Python LaCie das U-Boot Milchkuh, I'm not
> really good at giving names, if you have any idea, feel free to share.
Shouldn't it be "die U-Boot Milchkuh" instead of "das U-Boot Milchkuh",
because the cow
Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2012, 15:32 +0400 schrieb Игорь Пашев:
>
>
> 2012/11/14 Philip Ashmore
> simple format which, like xml, is human-readable
>
>
> XML is not human-readable :-)
XML is human-readable, but in most cases ugly to write. IMO XML is not
human-wr
Am Freitag, den 09.11.2012, 10:12 + schrieb Neil McGovern:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:54:23AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > Quoting Benjamin Drung (bdr...@debian.org):
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 08.11.2012, 20:35 + schrieb Jon Dowland:
> > > > On Thu, No
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
