ou old timers
that I used to work with might be willing to sign my new key and/or
would be looking for possible keysigning in Philadelphia, PA area or
maybe even New Haven, CT area.
Thanks for any guidance/help!
Barry deFreese
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 09:38 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 14.07.24 02:28, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > OK, don't beat me up too bad, even though I deserve it. I've been
> > away
> > a LONG time and did not retire properly nor update my key and my
> >
Universe is winning." Rich Cook.
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
what shall I do about that?
greetings,
jonas
What version of lintian do you have? That should be fixed by now.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urd5 to nurd6 if it was still there or no?
If I have done something wrong, please feel free to notify me and let me
know but I don't think it helps us any to just say "here we go again".
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.
Checking something extensively is much easier if there
is one canonical branch which everybody agrees on.
Sounds like Utopia but I can't see it happening.
Regards,
Martin
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any reverse dependencies except for the
Python ones, so I think we’d be better off removing them ASAP.
If you are fine with it, I’ll do a MBF.
Cheers,
Joss,
I was getting ready to file all of these so a +1 from me.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
.
There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some users
reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with openjdk but I
have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
My personal feeling is that we either need to remove it or fix it up.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Barry deF
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
users reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with
openjdk but I have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
I might
34 outstanding security issues? :)
OK, I guess it stays but it would be nice to get it fixed up.
Thanks for all the input.
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
have bugs and a very low popcon.
Does anyone have any objections before I remove them?
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
bugs and/or
> remove them from the archive.
I like that plan!
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
point me to a wiki page that has a correct way to adopt a package
> such as soundjuicer.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Andreas Marschke.
>
>
Andreas,
Where did you see that it was up for adoption? It's not listed as Orphaned or
RFA'd? In fact it just had an upload on 10/31
especially appreciate some feedback from any kfreeBSD folks as I
re-applied the patch for the joystick stuff but had to re-factor it a little.
Thanks!
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Glibc Packaging Team,
Hi Pierre,
I got 2.5 to build with TLS but we need some changes to Hurd and gnumach
to handle it. As I understand it we have even more issues with 2.6.
Of course I'm certainly not the expert on the issue..
Thanks,
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
.
- Upload them to unstable.
For the moment I did one upload to experimental, but I am not convinced
by my own choice. If somebody has wise comments, I will be grateful to
listen them.
Have a nice day,
Just help get ctsim to build with wx2.8 so we can drop 2.4. ;-)
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
kages should be removed as soon as they don’t have
remaining rdeps
I will look at this as well since I'm on an RM:/proposed RM kick. I
assume this is more of a Lenny+1 goal?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Barry deFreese wrote:
OK, I have looked at several of these and man what a mess.
Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnome-libs
Orphaned but obviously tons of r(b)depends.
gtkfontsel
Orphaned but a fairly significant popcon. I can't find new upstream
source. Could probabl
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
[...]
stegdetect
RM: filed.
Why isn't just the xsetg package dropped? stegdetect is a CLI app; only xsteg
uses GTK+
Cheers,
/me who has stegdetect installed and keeps it around to time by time try to find
something that
pends
while libnet1 exists. Who's taking care of those users? Should we keep
every version of glibc in the archive? How about all the gnome1 stuff?
BTW, I don't care if GTK+ 1.2 stays or goes but I do care about
unmaintained stuff hanging around.
Just my worthless $.02 :)
Barry d
Michael Banck wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:20:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
So I am not advocating keeping every bit of software around.
If we keep every version of every library out there how do we support
it?
Morten did not say that
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 15.47, Barry deFreese wrote:
Obviously I was exaggerating purposely.
Yes, but, you know, exaggerating the position of others in a forum
like this is not really constructive. In fact, it signals that you've
run out of arguments.
Give me a
a [1]. The modified package is on mentors and I am
looking for
a sponsor [2] (nudge nudge :-))
Morten,
Maybe I've already offended you but I already offered to sponsor your
gtkglarea upload, I just had a question on the soname mismatch that I
asked about on -mentors.
Thanks,
Barry d
Neil Williams wrote:
Barry - PLEASE do not continue with the request for sponsorship of
gtkglarea.
Neil,
My apologies but I just uploaded it. It still has a few r(b)depends:
rdepends:
xt
worlded
vertex
python-visual
rbdepends:
celestia
vertex
xt
Sorry,
Barry deFreese
--
To
porting
and/or uploads of new upstream where possible. I'd personally love to
see it go but I'm just one lowly new DD in a sea of people with much
more skills than I. :)
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
and NMUs for a couple of them. I will keep updating these notes if I
get anywhere.
If any of you maintain any of these packages and have any
thoughts/suggestions/etc, please feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
shell.
Cheers,
Looks like snes9express is supposed to be another front-end that is
gtk2.0 but it has never been part of a stable release.
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ew upstream available. I've pinged the ITAer to
see if the new upstream is GTK 2.0.
sqlrelay
Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either
port sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:40 AM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Actually, it would be nice if we had a decicated cleanups/transitions
overview page on wiki.debian.org as a central starting point for
people who want to help out.
This is the old one:
http://wiki.debian.org
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.or
fail for Debian?
They get paid? In my experience this helps a lot to be nicer to stupid
people.
No, MOTUs are held to the same CoC and are definetly NOT paid.
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.or
. But I did have "Just a suggests, can
probably be removed." in there.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
at gnome-libs removal was suggested (and bugs
filed) over a year ago, does it make sense to remove gnome-libs before
Lenny releases?
For more details, I have been trying to keep the wiki page up to date:
http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Barry deFreese schreef:
Hi folks,
There are only 5 packages left that have reverse depends on gnome-libs
packages. They are as follows:
digitaldj: Removal request was filed but maintainer claims someone has
done a Gtk2 port and saved it for now.
I thought this
se of
you that wish it to survive, want to take over maintenance of the
package? If not, I will likely be requesting removal. It is currently
not in testing.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
or
exactly a master but I'm happy to help if you want it.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woohoo, congrats Torsten.
Again, I must apologize for my extended absence, work and personal life are
just insane right now.
I hope it slows down in the winter and I will resume full duties. :(
Thanks,
Barry
On 9/17/2010 11:52 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Heyho,
>
> as you may have read in the
ing or some other form of notification that you were working on
it would have helped.
Sorry,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
).
I was considering packaging up the new upstream but I would have to
register to do that and I am not really keen on putting that much effort
into a non-free package.
Anyone have an opinion?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
P.S. Apologies for the cross-post but since arb is a Debian Med
Packaging
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
I was considering packaging up the new upstream but I would have to
register to do that
not true: ftp://ftp.ics.com/openmotif/
Anyone have an opinion?
it's still on my todo list. if i'll not get arround to do it over t
an
SDL team which
ideally would be packaging it. Have they been contacted?
I am actually a member of that team but admittedly have not been keeping up
with it unfortunately. :(
Thanks,
- --
Barry deFreese
Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to:
Debian Gam
42 matches
Mail list logo
