offhand, but it's quite doable. I believe it is merely that the kernel
can't autodetect the presence of this controller in older versions.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`-
On Tue 4 November, spender wrote:
> I've spared you your precious time and gone ahead and done this for
> you.
You might have a better reception if you dropped the attitude.
Anyone reading the thread will quickly form the opinion that maintaining
PaX within Debian would likely require frequent i
nel modules, and need
not match the running kernel or any installed kernel source
tree.
Andrew
g to do it
> > from one package, and why we don't do that already?
>
> I haven't noticed, so thanks for pointing this out. The fix is trivial, btw.
No, the fix is a fucking huge amount of work, which is why nobody has
done it before, even for the upstream kernel.
--
.&
el
programming knows that differences are as likely to cause a
performance loss as they are to cause a gain. More so, in fact; it's
easier to make code slower than it is to make it faster.
We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
hasn't been any in the past. If
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
> >hasn't been any in the past. If you don't have any evidence, you can
> >expect people to call bul
ndarisation means?
"Creation of an arbitrary feature set that all parties involved agree
is worse than what they had before".
"Standards" are snake oil.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `'
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 06:59:39PM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté :
>
> > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Mateusz Papiernik wrote:
> >> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >> >We're all very interested in *rea
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:53:26AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We're all very interested in *real* evidence here, because there
> > hasn't been any in the past. If
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:18:34AM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 12:33:15 +
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Please provide carefully documented evidence of the performance gains
> > that you are claiming, not handwaving. Evid
add lots of dubious patches. I don't use the packaged gpm
because the Debian patches cause my mouse to fail to initialize. My
past attempts to discuss this with the maintainer (Zephaniah Hull)
were unproductive, though I'd be happy to try again.
Andrew
ase do it right and
try and it get the xserver-xfree86's debconf scripts to do all the
configuration, otherwise it'll cause the user too much grief. Best of
luck.
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
---
Andre
g more indicative of total inexperience than
"it works fine".
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
many software programs called "linux" are around?
Dozens. Lots of people have created variations on the theme of
"linux". You're not even talking about packaging the one released from
kernel.org, you're talking about creating your own fork (vis. patches
to make it wo
d considerable *empirical proof* that
it's wrong (disproving statements like "Y is true for all X" is easy;
proving them is hard).
So don't whine about people "refusing to accept" it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
latter prohibits it from being in a Debian release. The former
should keep it out of the archive entirely.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n future, it took me
barely five minutes to note all this stuff and write this mail.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
's not an optimisation.
Mmm. -ffast-math and -funsafe-math-optimizations, off the top of my
head.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:19:58AM +, Will Newton wrote:
> On Monday 10 Nov 2003 19:54, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > We refuse to accept it blindly because it's wrong. There have been
> > cases when architecture-specific optimisations have made programs run
&
why are you so eager to use things which they say
aren't ready for release, if you trust their skills so much?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
te is confusion.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
em now or after
the next reboot?". Debconf is not an alternative to fixing the
problem. Such questions are still unacceptable bugs.
Note that the current kernel packages don't break your system before
*or* after rebooting.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:25:41PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > - I'm not trying to make a package, the package is already m
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:47:14PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> However,
> for the matter of finding out wether there will be much people in that
> userbase, there's the Popularity Contest.
Some people just never learn.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andre
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:23:44AM +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I
> for one _would_ appreciate having a debian-standard linux package.
kernel-source-*, kernel-image-*, kernel-headers-*
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' :
Linux espresso 2.4.23-pre9 #1 Mon Nov 10 16:37:06 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8
--
---
Andrew "Netsnipe" LauComputer Sci. UNSW & Debian GNU/Linux
GnuPG 1024D/2
ght now. I was wondering if
anyone here is actually using the software and might be able to help me
with decent descriptions for:
libpolhem-dev
libnobel-dev
libzorn-dev
libcelsius-dev
libsolid-dev
libgarbo-dev
3dwm-geoclient
3dwm-pickclient
3dwm-server
Thanks,
Andrew
signature.asc
Descriptio
don't have much of a problem with these people joining *because*
our process is the way it is. It is flawed to suggest that this means
we wouldn't have one if it were easier.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andre
ed if there weren't any people
objecting to the DAM. That would indicate he's letting people get away
with too much. This means it's useless as a measure of problems.
So, I find both your argument and your interpretation of its
c
ou acquired this impression. I'd say quite the
opposite, on all points.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:03:42AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 14-Nov-03, 19:52 (CST), Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > > I'm trying to prepare a QA upload of the 3dwm source package, and clo
for a name change before the real RMS decides to sue
us for misrepresenting him! = )
vbranden?
vdlegal?
Nominations are now open.
Cheers,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
--
-------
Andrew "Netsnipe" LauC
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:14:53PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> against his packages which uses a license his real self would approve.
against packages which use a license his real self would approve.
--
---
And
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:15:25AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:35:19PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > - Debian 3.0 doesn't support much of the hardware curently available -
ing real test
suites for them all would be more of a Herculean task.
> GUI programs are another story, but that's not a reason not to do it
> for non-GUI ones.
Right. It's a reason not to do any of it (test suites, or the
building/migration goo) for GUI programs.
--
.'&#x
of what
this would accomplish, I have a few guesses about what you might be
trying to do, and I think there are probably less intrusive and more
effective approaches].
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `'
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:12:42PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > This seems like a solution in search of a problem. What problem are
> > you actually trying to solve? Start by describing it, then we can try
> > dreaming up
> Possibly not, but I think a case could be made that Debian's users do.
> (You know, that other priority, the one that isn't Free Software...)
...the one that is no more important than free software.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' :
0-13498cl.i386.rpm
>
> couldn't this just refer to dpkg --install ?
But that won't satisfy any dependencies that the package you're installing
has.
> > Similarly, to check the build depends of a source package file:
> > apt-get build-dep apt-listchanges-1.49-11104cl.src.rpm
>
> similarly...?
See above.
regards
Andrew
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Finally, the "decision" isn't just "technical".
Ah, the inevitable cry of the advocate of the technically inferior
approach.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew S
ious flaw with
it...
Andrew
le version that incorporates that fix.
Andrew
sktop files" here and your
argument would still be about as valid.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:01:27PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:19:28PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> | On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 12:34:22AM +0100, Raphael Goulais wrote:
> | > On Wednesday 03 December 2003 21:31, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> | > >
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 03:44:56PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >That wasn't his argument. However, it's similar, and the response is
> >the same: why not simply add these features to the Debian menu system?
>
> Why be gratuitously
Sort of, but...
> In fact, it looks like it's been implemented twice, once for KDE and
> once for GNOME. (Is there any reason why the .desktop files aren't being
> shared between the two DE's? It also appears to me that KDE is doing a
> margina
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:27:50PM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > Are there any technical complaints about it? (Apart from "I don't
> > > like the .desktop extension", which I consider unimportant.)
> >
>
is there more black magic involved with kernel packages?
Thanks
Andrew
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:59:40PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 16:41, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, I was wondering how to go about taking the source package for
> > 2.4.23-686 (and the SMP version) and backport them to stable?
&g
retty simple to implement - just more
text fields. That way we support the upstream menu entries in
everything, not just kde and gnome.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> "*must* provide a .desktop file rather than the old
> Debian-specific menu format".
>
> Stem 5: Compatibility code for the old format in the menu
> infrastructure will be kept until it gets too much of a burden
> to maintain it.
S
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > I presume I can lower the dependencies on things like modutils and whatnot
> > down to the versions that are in stable with no ill-effects?
>
> It only depends on coreutils|fileutils, so there's no problems in that regard.
What a
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 05:11:50PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:35, Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > > I presume I can lower the dependencies on things like modutils
ase of kde/gnome, that would be a
.desktop file; for everything else, yes, the data is thrown
away. Nothing else supports those features, and this is again not our
problem.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
serdir-ldap addresses if I send
using mutt, not mail(1). I can't figure out what the significant
headers are - afaict, the interesting ones are the same.
Helpfully, changes@ can only parse mails I send with mail(1), not
those I send with mutt, so I have to do it blind.
--
.''`
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:06:48PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
> >> You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the
> >> de
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:29PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 02:51:53AM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
>
> > > You do realize that the desktop standard has more features than the deb
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:54AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > It's "pass a few more text fields through to the menu methods, and use
> > them to generate .desktop files" versus "rewrite everything".
>
>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:47:28AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:25PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> | Alternate approaches (that involve significantly less work)
>
> That's the bit that I (and presumably others) am not convinced about.
&g
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:18:21PM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 09:49:54AM -0600, Billy Biggs wrote:
> > > Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > >
> > > > It's "pass a f
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:29:24PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:31:17PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > We don't have to map them onto anything. We just have to pass them
> > through to the menu methods in a fashion that allows them to generat
or Gnome. YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE A DESKTOP FILE IF YOU WANT
> A DECENT MENU.
FUD.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n (generally used when you aren't being very
serious). I don't think it's a very good idea to use in this context.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 10:01:39PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:08:38PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:29:24PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:31:17PM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > >
in as
much depth as I'd have liked to have before floating it, but I felt the
original email was a good catalyst for getting it out there...
Andrew
ations.
X does *not* require that fonts be installed on the same host as the
client application, nor can it use them if they are. Fonts must rather
be installed on the host where the font server runs, which is probably
the one where the X server runs.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** |
talled in
> the file system visible to the application, not on a server someplace.
> This is the Xft2/fontconfig stuff deploying.
I am so glad I don't use xft2 for anything.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andre
an be written considerably shorter
if you don't make making it ugly. If you feel like doing so, please do
something worthwhile instead)
(MIT/X11 license)
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
ou pick, odds
are high that *something* uses it as a fixed port number, so sooner or
later it'll break for somebody.
The proper approach would have been for sunrpc to carve out a few
ports exclusively for its own use, but it's a bit late for that now.
--
.
rorprune but still something
> achievable in a postinst script.
Methinks we need something like wwwconfig-common, but for databases...
regards
Andrew
s on his asbestos suit)
>
> Please rename "planner" to "gnome-planner" immediately.
> Please rename "netspeed" to "gnome-netspeed" immediately.
This is not the appropriate place to be filing bugs;
for my
> > soundcard.
>
> likewise for me. i've found that after a fresh debian install, one of
> the first things i have to do is add a bunch of modules to hotplug's
> blacklist.
>
Ditto, which is what pisses me off about hotplug. It seems far more
indiscriminate in its
ed to use that, rather than its current special-case code.
I'd potentially like to help, possibly along with a friend who is a UML
user, but not a DD. I'll have a lot more spare time in about a month, so
could potentially make a concerted effort to get things ship-shape.
regards
A
ed features have been used and libtool was
instructed to link statically.
I can't think of any sane reason why you would do that on Debian.
(Other reasons? I can't think of any)
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dep
lt_dlopen() looks for the exact file you specify.
lt_dlopenext() looks first for .la, then for whatever the local system
conventionally uses (.so on gnu platforms).
Both are quite capable of operating on the .so directly, as long as
you don't use some of the more arcane features (d
nces welcome).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
pgp6lyX23uthH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;ll write the formal rules and set up the scripts.
If you have ideas for a better name, send them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Kudos to Richard Braakman for coming up with the idea and helping
sketch out most of the details]
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' :
ad "SSL/TLS support" added, but don't do any hostname
checking against the certificate - leaving you open to
man-in-the-middle attacks.
Andrew
--
Andrew McDonald
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mcdonald.org.uk/andrew/
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:57:12PM -0700, Neil Spring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 06:58:00PM +0100, Andrew McDonald wrote:
> > On a similar subject, there seem to be more than a few applications
> > that have had "SSL/TLS support" added, but don't do any hos
dy if they don't fix it
first - as long as either somebody fixes it, or nobody cares, why does
it matter?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
pgpbmRjrFdgxe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s (AIUI) to
allow this kind of upload, where the maintainer has advance
notification and a chance of override it, but if they don't then the
new package will go into the pool.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
pgpZRaydU8uZy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
//www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tls-extensions-05.txt>
Or, using a "TLS upgrade" procedure as in RFC2817 where the server name
can be specified in a Host: header before the TLS handshake is started.
For other protocols, e.g. IMAP and SMTP, the STARTTLS method is used to
do som
dvice, and telling people what to spend
their time on.
There may be valid reasons for not making NMUs in these circumstances,
but this is not one of them.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `
asonably be met with a Recommends: or Suggests:
Recommends and Suggests are not considered when installing
build-dependencies.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:40:55PM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:02:40AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:50:32PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > >>> > The question I want to pose today is &quo
I get it to work at all.
Then no, you don't. It was probably a mistake to ever attempt to
codify the list of virtual packages in policy. Agreement amoung the
people involved is sufficient.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.d
cifically about
the effects of changing context.
> The fact I posted that Andrew Lau should see someone about
> his disturbances comes about because of prior experience
> with that particular person, and seeing that he seems to
> like stirring things up and watching the result. He's d
Hi,
Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM process?
Andrew
filmgimp-dev_0.8a-3_i386.deb
68K libfilmgimp_0.8a-3_i386.deb
Thanks in advance,
Andrew "Netsnipe" Lau
- Forwarded message from Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Official Film Gimp 0.8a-3 packages f
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:52:13PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Since satie.d.o has been destroyed, where does this leave the NM
> process?
The real question is, will anything change in NM for those who've
already waited over 6 months for DAM approval. = P
11 and still countin
re: i386
Kernel: Linux espresso 2.4.19 #1 Tue Nov 12 23:32:34 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
---
* Andrew 'Netsnipe' Lau Computer Science & Sturep, UNSW *
* "apt-get into it
s a memory-to-framebuffer-throughput-bound
operation, not a CPU-bound one (unless your processor is really slow
and your resolution is absurdly high).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `'
ve me temporary access to? I'd like
to troubleshoot this problem quickly, rather than rolling a new package,
waiting for sponsor to upload it and then seeing what the Alpha buildd
does with it, rinsing and repeating.
Thanks
Andrew
pgpfJEIkGas5b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 02:20:04AM -0800, Jim Lynch wrote:
> The fact I posted that Andrew Lau should see someone about his
> disturbances comes about because of prior experience with that
> particular person, and seeing that he seems to like stirring things
> up and watching the resul
ow.
If we were to improve our current user-build mechanisms, would it be
feasible for Debian source packages or a mirror to keep track of what
flags are known to break what packages on what $ARCHs? It'd cer
ome a developer left NM with the question of what you intended to
> do crossed with what you had the skills to do. Perusing your entry
> in NM, you have passed the skills test. Congrats. But my question
> still stands...
> On Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:08:29 +1000 Andrew Lau
> <
ort.
You have some nerve there Jim flaunting your arrogance like that. I
have tried to reply to you in a rational and polite manner, but I have
come to the conclusion that no matter what I say or do, you will
continue t
point: mutt's IMAPS capability depends on a specific version of
libgnutls5 being present, or it complains about a missing symbol and
hides your mail from you when you try to access a mailbox starting with
"imaps://".
Regards,
--
Andrew Chadwick
pgpquDqeDU20I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-29
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tsclient
Version : 0.56
Upstream Author : Erick Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gnomepro.com/tsclient/
* License : GPL
Description : GNOME2 frontend for rdeskto
601 - 700 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
