27;ve read in many places that one
should never adjust the system clock discontinuously, especially not
backwards. Do you have any thoughts on this?
Andrew
Newsletter
Make
us an offer on Ebay.
Newsletter
Make
us an offer on Ebay.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew
* Package name: nccm
Version : 1.2.0
Upstream Author : Kenneth Aaron
* URL : https://github.com/flyingrhinonz/nccm
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Terminal based ssh connection
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andrew Ruthven
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmarkdown-render-perl
Version : 1.04
Upstream Author : Rob Lauer
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Markdown-Render
s work?
I would like to volunteer. Please give me some pointers on how I could
better educate myself, as I have an interest in increasing my understanding
of the "back-end" of what makes the distribution tick.
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ -
e improved. It also explains why the current process needs to
> be improved as well.
>
> Thanks to Ubuntu, we now have a good example of what's proven
> to work.
>
I think it is premature to declare that Ubuntu's model works any better than
what we're currently doing, in
alve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: rpm
Maintainer: Jeff Teunissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: wsoundserver
Should I file a bug against these packages requesting that they update their
build dependencies? wsoundserver already has such a bug filed, so there
would
nly use it in scenarios where you would be willing to use
pam_console.
(Why somebody bothered to implement resmgr instead of simply enhancing
pam_console is beyond me; probably NIH)
--
.''`. ** Debian G
cess someplace. Quite ironically, the
solutions to the problems they cite for pam_console are exactly the
same as the solutions they implemented for resmgr. Hence I figure it
was probably NIH.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: dstat
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Dag Wieers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/dstat/
* License : GPL
Description : versatile resource statistics tool
Dstat is a versatile r
iner: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: bash
Maintainer: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> if have a segmentation fault with the csh.
> the csh still crashs if you run eval '\!\!' in it.
All the more reason to use a better shell, or file a bug.
regards
an are
guaranteed to always have conflicting results. No matter what your
position on an issue, somebody in the project disagrees with you.
Get over it.
The only genuinely neutral content is the output of /dev/random; all
else is subjective.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | An
only the tools provided on a
Debian CD is a total moron. You might as well complain that the
internet is bad, just because it's primarily used as a vehicle for
delivering porn.
[And that's without even starting on this insane notion that trying to
stop kids from seeing porn is someho
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:47:47PM +, Will Newton wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 Dec 2004 22:15, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > Anybody who can't obtain porn using only the tools provided on a
> > Debian CD is a total moron. You might as well complain that the
> > inter
east get it right.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; '(debTimeStamp>$lasttime)'. this would make keeping debian up to
> date over dialup a much easier experience i imagine.
Or you could just use something like rsync.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t; in?
>
> Well, you would need to check the penal codes of each individual state
> wherein such a minor resides;
[...]
> I don't
> know how this applies to offenders from the UK.
We tell them to fuck off.
--
.'
here is only absence of action from some parties.
Just because you elect not to engage in an action doesn't mean you can
claim that nobody else should engage in that action. Not even under
some misguided notion of "equality".
If somebody was saying &q
ight. If it's necessary for one thing then it's
necessary for everything.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 07:14:07PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> >Oh come on, they're at far greater risk from our overly-permissive
> >approach to copyright and patent issues.
> >
> The copyright and patent problems faced by Debian are i
On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 11:51:29PM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
> * License : Free for non-commercial use
>
> Subject to license verification (DFSG compliant):
Non-commercial-use-only licenses are non-free.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suf
roducing censorship in order to not 'hurt
their feelings' to be morally repugnant. It has been proven endless
times that once you start doing this, you can't stop. For any package,
there is going to be some minority group that is offended by it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be exploited.
Precisely. If we tolerate the intolerance of these people who are so
terrified of images of the naked female form, then they will continue
to exploit our tolerance.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
iven
> package is NOT censorship.
And telling somebody else that they can't distribute a given package
IS censorship.
You evidently have chosen not to do it. That's not censorship. You're
presumably also trying to tell somebody else not to do it. That's
censorship.
--
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 03:55:27PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] freedom of expression constitutes one of the essential
> > foundations of a democratic society and one of the basic conditions
> > for its
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:21:04PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 05-Dec-04, 09:07 (CST), Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:45:56AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > On 05-Dec-04, 04:55 (CST), James Foster &
th
> its expected implementation.
There's only one way this ever goes. Any student of history should be
familiar with how this plays out.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Debian works. You do the
stuff you're interested in (frequently without mentioning it to
anybody else, in some cases).
Your Chicken Little act is not impressing anybody.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `'
transliterated field should be called 'Maintainer'. If you want
some other freaky encoding, unsupported by the older tools, put it in
a new field. Using the old field just breaks stuff for no reason.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffi
you share interests with, then you really need to
emigrate or revolt. Mine doesn't.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:33:54PM -0500, Josh Metzler wrote:
> On Sunday 05 December 2004 08:25 pm, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:21:04PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > On 05-Dec-04, 09:07 (CST), Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
At least in .au we have some legislation to protect minority
> groups but we're not living in a totalitarian PC clampdown.
Sounds irrelevant. There's a big difference between 'protect minority
groups' (from what?) and 'compel everybody to behave in a
in the context that Bruce's "history" is
comprised of the immortal words "Fuck you all" and the deletion of our
mailing list archives. Then it makes more sense.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
not seriously applied. It's there to cover
the University in the case of a lawsuit, and to allow them to
selectively apply it to people they want to get rid of (just about
anybody can be effectively accused of violating the policy; it's
almost impossible to go through the day without doi
own actions.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hile censorship is a choice made by an otherwise unrelated
person in the same organisation.
Editing would be if the maintainer decided to remove the
package. Censorship is when some other developer tries to force him.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that in certain
> contexts compels people to behave in a manner approved of by minority
> groups, and yet we're not living in a totalitarian PC clampdown.
Yet.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 06-12-2004 alle 01:49 +0000, Andrew Suffield ha scritto:
> > Word games. Censorship is when a citizen of one body chooses to have
> > that body distribute something (by being a citizen and distributi
sible to think a package like hot-babe
> is a bad idea without wanting to be set up as a censor for all ideas they
> disagree with.
However, it's extremely unlikely that it is possible to ban it for
that reason without going down that path. There's a significant
difference between
ng. Commercial publishers run into this
problem all the time and often decide it's safer not to bother]
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
sing a 'core' chunk early before there are any
applications to run on it?)
(c) Stuff that we've tried before and abandoned (like freezing
unstable)
(d) Stuff that isn't related to making releases faster
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
instead. Should be a trivial addition of a
conditional somewhere.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7;s not their fault if the
software doesn't work, or indeed completely fails to be inside the
expensive box when you open it).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
l world. Free software is here.
We'll do it again if we have to. They can open their specifications or
we'll fucking implement around them and eventually drive them out of
the market.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | A
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:07:35AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> It will take fund-raising to do it.
Bullshit. There goes that "free software is impossible" argument
again.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :&#x
nity to make widely desireable
chips with zero royalty costs.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 03:57:19PM -0500, Brendan wrote:
> On Monday 13 December 2004 14:50, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:21:54AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > > My surmise is that we'd need an effort like that, raising $250K, to
> > &
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 08:43:37AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:50:02PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:21:54AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > > My surmise is that we'd need an effort like that, raising $250K, to
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 02:13:53PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 07:50:02PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:21:54AM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > > My surmise is that we'd need an effort like that, raising $250K, to
''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
) and requires various pieces of test equipment (the
> purchase of which would also be a capital expense). One way or another,
> someone will have to bear these expenses.
And they say that about software too.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tatement was of the form "Here is how we do it,
and our way is the only way in which it is possible to do it". And
we've heard that one before.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
don't have that excuse.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] are requests for requeuing?
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Australia - http://lca2005.linux.org.au/ -Get bitten!
signature.asc
D
ctually not abreast of what the issue is with the security infrastructure,
so I don't know if it's likely to be a blocker all over again come etch
release time. I'd like to think it's going to easier to release etch sooner.
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - ht
dn't this have a flow on effect on our mirrors (or is the mirror pulse
independent of the dinstall run)? Either way, if the mirror pulse only
happens once a day, running dinstall more than once is going to be largely
ineffective for most users isn't it?
regards
Andrew
--
linu
ot more
> > time-effective, mail for mail, than trying to teach people how to use their
> > MUA.)
>
> Mail-Followup-To is not part of any of the standards defining e-mail
> protocols.
Which just goes to show how useless and irrelevant these purported
"standards&qu
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 02:45:12PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:36:11 +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> >> http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
> >
decoders.
Encoders only, not decoders. Decoders for anything probably cannot be
patented.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:56:43PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 12:06:53PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > > Is only MPEG Layer III patent encumbered ?
> > > > How about the other MPEG stuff ?
> > > > I find it har
Those are the patents for the transport mechanisms. Still not the decoders.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:03:37PM +, Will Newton wrote:
> On Saturday 08 Jan 2005 15:46, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> > > And every set top box manufacturer pays for their MPEG-2 (or MPEG-4)
> > > licenses.
> >
> > Those are the patents for the transpor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nautilus-sendto
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Roberto Majadas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.es.gnome.org/~telemaco/
* License : GPL
ve ported all their scripts
to the new RT 3.4 APIs.
"Our priorities are our users ..." right?
That said, we'll scrap the 3.2 packages when 3.4 get into sid;
they've never been in a stable distribution and they haven't been in
sid for that long.
--
Andrew Stribblehill
t having write access to any media that's not marked noexec?
>
> But I agree that the security benefits are trivial on a system where
> users have access to perl.
Or bash, that's enough to do it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :'
you could have done that yourself and saved us all the time
of a couple of mails.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
#x27;s a real problem that we've been facing for quite some
time now.
Action based on rational evaluation of the consequences *only*, please.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ated file in place; no file is better than a
mangled file).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o, not really. It's slow and doesn't present any views
on the information that are particularly useful and it's completely
immune to shell scripting. A web interface would appear to be the
wrong way to do this.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
(I've hacked the code.)
Unfortunately apt breaks the code. If you use dpkg directly it'll
work. If you use apt it'll pick a random and unpredictable starting
point.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** |
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:49:41PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20050228T164806+0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Unfortunately apt breaks the code. If you use dpkg directly it'll
> > work. If you use apt it'll pick a random and unpredictable starting
&g
ce and forgive me If I should begin asking for this in
> debian-users.
>
Possibly debian-project is a better list to ask.
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://linux.conf.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Au
hy random people should not be writing licenses.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ople ever object to 'pr0n' in the first place :P
But since those would exclude so much of the archive already, they
really can't be allowed as criteria.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
stems with a label, however I didn't manage to convince them to mount
by the label in /etc/fstab
regards
Andrew
--
linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux
April 18th to 23rd - http://linux.conf.au/ - LINUX
Canberra, Australia - http://linux.conf.au/ -
Trust is a 3-ary function of the form:
trust :: Person -> Task -> Scenario -> Boolean
And is defined as:
trust p t s = (need_to_trust p t s) && (willing_to_trust p t s)
It is not this, as you so absurdly clai
GR amending the DFSG is proposed and
passed, the ambiguity will remain.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/07/msg00435.html
--
Andrew Saunders
be better than using yet another
> scheme.
>
As a user, I much prefer
foo
+ libfoo
+ foo-doc-en
+ foo-doc-fr
rather than
foo
+ libfoo
+ foo-en-doc
+ foo-fr-doc
To me the hierarchy tree
--
is much more natural than
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:40, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Andrew Vaughan wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:28, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > FWIW, Debian package names prefer e.g. foo-en-uk-doc over
> > > foo-documentation-ukenglish.
Can you provide a reference/stats to back t
gt;
> Since when is a message that is on topic (or at least relevant) to
> Debian development spam?
Everything on -devel is spam these days, didn't you get the memo?
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux
r "package libbar-dev". I think this functionality would have to be
> implemented on the BTS side.
Logically package should work where is a source package. (Because
its quite common to eg tag multiple bugs pending at the same time).
Andrew V.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y the
> Debian submenu.
>
On my sarge system KDE already does this. (Installed from sarge Installer
beta 1 IIRC).
Menu->Internet->Download Manager (KGet)
FTP Client (KBear)
etc
Not all programs are properly classified eg. Mozilla, Thunderbird, most of the
Development tools s
ectory.
> >
> > Is this fixable or do I have to set up my complete system again? Hope
> > not.
> >
> > Pascal.
>
> Here is what worked for me:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/12/msg01408.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2005/12/msg01406.html
>
> post your steps if you get stuck
>
> Andrei
HTH
Andrew V.
tivating participation and how you actually sort of
keep from getting stuck in a rut or something. So... I don't know that
I have any more brilliant ideas than that.
[1]
http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2005/debconf5/mpeg/2005-07-16/08-Structural_Evolution-Bdale_Garbee.mpeg
--
Andrew Saunders
rts
> of the world.
I wish we could get it that cheap for my day job. What we have to pay
to get useful bandwidth has more zeros in it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`-
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 09:56:27AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 12/19/05, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:27:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Steinar H. Gunderson:
> > >
> > >
redit.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
could easily result in some-one restoring a backup over the wrong disk.
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
h a team too. All it takes is some
> interested people and an alioth project.
>
> - David Nusinow
I was about to suggest exactly that.
Thanks David
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g every *change* to a
given component to go through a single individual. Large projects need
a pumpking, because dogpiling creates lousy software. For Debian this
would be cumbersome and unwieldy as a rule, but some high-importance
tasks could benefit from it.
--
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:43:34AM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 08:38 +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On the other hand, I think there might be some benefit to requiring
> > that the Maintainer field must always denote one single Debian
> > develo
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:31:19PM -0500, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> >On the other hand, I think there might be some benefit to requiring
> >that the Maintainer field must always denote one single Debian
> >developer, who would be the "
problem at hand is exactly that /dev/hdX won't
> necessarily be stable anymore.
>
> (and, once more, and much worse: network interfaces need a solution to the
> same problem...)
nameif, ifrename - really, this problem has been solved so many times
that it's just not funny a
,headers}.
(on sarge, long lines trimmed)
$ apt-cache search 586 |grep image
kernel-image-2.4-586tsc - Linux kernel image for version 2.4 on Pentium-Clas
kernel-image-2.4.27-2-586tsc - Linux kernel image for version 2.4.27 on Pent
As Jérôme said, no 2.6 kernel compiled for 586 in sarge.
Andrew
ills to create their own package can still contribute. And
by contributing they can learn new skills.
Just my 2 cents
Andrew V.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
he last days on other lists than debian-devel, then this
> information is maybe helpful to identify the address.
>
debian-user is also affected
Andrew V.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ld one expires should be safe at present. That's a conservative
estimate. To defend against ancillary attacks (like somebody grabbing
a copy of the key from ftp-master) you need to know how probable they
are, and reduce these figures accordingly.
--
.''`. ** Deb
ces
don't scale to the level at which we have to work *all the time*. Just
ask the BTS admins what happens when somebody scans
http://bugs.debian.org/ to collect data.
Oh, and hey - when SuSE are doing better than you at publishing the
tools they use, it's a hint that maybe you suck.
d possibly be right, but you never know
without reading the thing...
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 1356 matches
Mail list logo
