Peter S Galbraith wrote:
AFAIK, you need to depend on emacs itself (and not emacs-common) if you
byte-compile it. I _think_ stuff can break if you don't, but I'm vague
on why. Search the debian-emacsen archives. I split off a package
because of that issue a while back, but the seperate -el packa
Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Agustin Martin Domingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Last time I read about that, if is byte compiled it should depend on
virtual package 'emacsen' (provided by all emacs flavours), since
otherwise emacs-package-install failed if no emacsen was installed.
r version=0
and also different to 10 or 10, which would just mean major versions
10 or 10
Cheers,
--
=============
Agustin Martin Domingo, Dpto. de Fisica, ETS Arquitectura Madrid,
(U. Politecnica de Madrid) tel: +34 91-336-6536, Fax:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-12-03
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: myspanish (or openoffice.org-spellcheck-es-es)
* License : (GPL)
Description : The myspell spanish dictionary for openoffice
This is simply a reservation to notify that I plan to prepare a myspell
with a '\documentstyle{your_style}' call
instead of a '\documentclass' one the 209 compatibility mode should
automatically be activated. What kind of problems are you experiencing?
Cheers,
--
=========
Agustin Mart
TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
It is true that the 2.09 compatibility mode works finely in almost
cases. However, LaTeX-2.09 itself still be needed for style files
that use internal macros of LaTeX-2.09. The style file of my
bachelor's thesis is an example of such style files, and there are a
fair num
6 matches
Mail list logo
