Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ttf-antp
Version : 0.51
Upstream Author : Bogus³aw Jackowski, Janusz M. Nowacki and Piotr Strzelczyk
* URL : http://www.janusz.nowacki.strefa.pl/poltawski-e.html
* L
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Miros/law Baran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > The font is included in the tetex-base package, along with other Type1
> > GUST-sponsored fonts (Antykwa Toru?ska etc.) - I think such a package
> > will be redundant.
>
> Well, tetex-base only has the afm a
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
I'm working on new package for FUSE[1]. Sad to come clean, but I screwed
previous package(s) up. There are plenty of bugs wrt debconf questions and
actions after them. There is also request[2] to simplify or even remove
questions at all.
Now I
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
use nameif.
This has been suggested before but AIUI nameif has problems/limitations
renaming eth0.
Well, you just cant use existing names (this could be fixed, however i am
not sure if this is needed)
It
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Dec 19, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there some reason we should be unable to provide a smooth upgrade path
for users of sarge? Having your network devices scramble themselves on
reboot is a Big Deal, whether or not it's in the releas
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Steve Greenland wrote:
On 20-Dec-05, 09:56 (CST), Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:57:08AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
[1] Dark blue on black. Need I say more?
The reality is that visibility of color combinations is heavily
dependent on
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Henning Makholm wrote:
Scripsit Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now, if your terminal pretends to be xterm but does not use the color
scheme of xterm, how should vim know that?
You can't.
real console: TERM='linux'
xterm: TERM='xterm'
gnome-terminal: TERM='xterm'
konsol
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 09:45:29PM -0500, Eric Cooper wrote:
I saw today that the python-minimal package in unstable is tagged as
Essential (and currently pulls in python2.3). According to policy,
this is supposed to happen only after discussion on debi
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Michael Banck wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:28:07PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
I've changed the override to Priority: standard; I can't say I'm remotely
impressed by how this has been handled.
Could this be
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Well, maybe the people who mislabeled the "everything is software" vote
as an "editorial change" and deceived many other developers should have
tought about this.
There are two different definitions of the word software:
1. something that can be represent
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Can you explain that?
Either the '{' and '}' are one indentation level down or the same indentation
level.
Hah! Not in GNU.
The GNU coding standards want you to indent '{' and '}' x/2 spaces, while
the code inside is indented x. So, the result is:
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 01:01:56PM +0200, oliver wrote:
> At Saturday 29 July 2006 22:15 wrote Henning Makholm:
> > Scripsit Oliver Korff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Description : computer chess engine, calculates chess moves
> > We seem to have several such engines already. Could the descripti
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:45:46PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Full IPv6 support
> =
>
> There has been some confusion about the Etch release goal about IPv6. Our
> understanding of that release goal is that all network applications should be
> able to work with both IPv4 and IPv
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:56:01PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> The inetd daemon installed by default:
> etch: openbsd-inetd | netkit-inetd
> sarge: netkit-inetd
> woody: netkit-inetd (netkit-base, split from netbase)
> potato: (in netbase)
> slink: (in netbase)
> Users
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:29:48AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 10, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - Some inetds automatically listen on v6, whereas others need it
> I call them "broken". I believe that administrators do not expect that
> services are exposed to IPv6 connection
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:34:39AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 11, Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why, for the love of Cthulhu, does netbase depend on inetd in the first
> > place? Let's see:
> Historical reasons.
>
> > Now, let
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:30:45AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.0012 +0100]:
> > 1.) Wait for a 0.10 release. I think my users wouldn't be happy ;-)
>
> Why not continue to current versioning scheme until 0.10 is out to
> avoid the epoch
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:17:43AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> "." is not special as far as version numbers are concerned. It's not
> a separator, for instance, and "1." is a valid version number (which
> is equal to "1.0").
Uhm, where does the "0" come from? This is grossly unintuitive, and
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 09:47:33AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.0931 +0100]:
> > And another bug: "2a.0" is _lesser_ than "2.0"! This works as
> > documented, but is totally against lexico
On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 09:52:01PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 10:58:13AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 12-Aug-06, 09:09 (CDT), Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > At 1155391794 past the epoch, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > > > Btw, why always the autotools
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:34:34PM -0600, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Wed August 23 2006 12:32, Blars Blarson wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >When a nice bittorrent frontend is installed, the user will only
> > > have to click on the link to start the downloa
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 07:29:22PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:16:49PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >>> which is definitifly a thing of the Kernel (Linux) which depend
> >>> on the support of the hardware manufacturer. If you want to
> >>>
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 02:01:21AM -0400, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Since I have no valid ID-Card (problens with France, since I am origin
> > iranish/turkish witeh illegal german adoptivp arents) I can not enter
> > the NM... nobody can sign legaly my GPG key and mor
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 10:12:04PM -0400, Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 09:24:21PM +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > > * Package name: adun.app
> > Maybe I miss some essential parts, but I always wonder why some people add
> > a .app to the software name? Can you please give
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
su, 2006-03-26 kello 04:11 -0600, Peter Samuelson kirjoitti:
OTOH, if you have no idea what language or what country the font
pertains to, why would you want that font?
It is not inconceivable that one could stumble on a document from
Bhutan, and want
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Option 3 "Steve McIntyre"
Option 4 "Anthony Towns"
Take a look at these numbers:
Option 3 Reached quorum: 344 > 47.0531614240744
Option 4 Reached quorum: 339 > 47.0531614240744
Option 3 passes Majority. 6.491 (344/53) > 1
Option 4
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
Really? I get spam addressed to ftp, cyrus (the Cyrus IMAP system),
postfix, apache, daemon, etc etc all the time. Those are very common
user names, and (even better for the spammers) their mail is typically
aliased to a group of people. They're proba
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:12:58AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
Result: programs run after ifrename (like ifupdown...) will get the old
name.
So what? The user deliberately asked for it. Also it seems easy to write
an udev rule to replace persistent-net-g
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
gustavo halperin dijo [Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 01:40:42PM +0300]:
I think that we have a problem when the common library between XFree and
/usr/lib are update in /usr/lib.
I assume that you're installing XFree86 4.5 by yourself, since it wasn't
packaged for
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What about oldstable while it is supported?
IMHO, would be good to have a way to check the bugs affecting each
release, so in the current interface we might have a link for:
Filter bugs affecting:
-
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : dnscruft
Version : 0.20060508-1
* URL : file://home/kilobyte/dnscruft/
Initial packages : http://angband.pl/debian/dnscruft/
Apt : deb[-src] http://angb
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
Martin Wuertele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about compressing all generated pdf with eg pdftk instead of gzip?
That would save on space without troubling potential readers.
Most PDF files in Debian are already compressed; at least those
which are gene
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:26PM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
> On the other hand, if we continue that thought process we could end up
> with all headers and libraries in /usr/share/, which is absurd.
Why? This is exactly what's beautiful, especially if EVERYTHING ends up in
/usr/share/ at one day,
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 01:17:02PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Out of curiousity, what happens when someone tries to login and /usr is
> unavailable? If the shell is set to something in /bin, it will still be
> used. What is the default action when the user's shell is not available?
foo:x
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:58:52PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 19:21 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > >> The point is that they could if the wanted to. And if they did, it
> > >> would work for _all_ programs, not just particular perl scripts that
> > >> happen to use som
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:18:46AM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> There are anyway users using dash as /bin/sh right now and broken
> packages are bugged, so switching default should not reveal any new bug
The policy says:
# If a script requires non-POSIX features from the shell interpreter, the
# a
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:27:23PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> During some tests I've performed, I've found that making the init
> scripts run with dash as default shell instead of bash makes the boot
> time a 10% faster (6 seconds in a 60 second boot).
This speed-up is not limited to boot
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:37:36PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Our Architecture: field is about the arches that Debian itself supports.
> If the meaning was broad as you describe, would we have to make sure our
> packages build on MS DOS?
>
> I'll agree with Josselin here: Debian is a GN
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 12:29:42AM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:18:19PM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > IMHO, pari-gp-c or pari-gp2c could be better than 'gp2c' to avoid
> > this namespace pollution, at your option.
> Good catch, I will consider this option.
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:42:03PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 23 May 2006, Goswin von Brederlow stated:
> > To me it sounds like you are. You provide a shared object file in a
> > public place so other people can link their binaries against
> > it. What else is a shared library? Does it ma
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> pictures and descriptions of what makes a real one for when they encounter an
> ID that they've never seen before. Surely Debian can do as well as the guy
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:29:34PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> * gnulib
> (easy pickings; need to package new Upstream from CVS, every month or so)
I ported quite a lot of C software between IRIX/SunOS/AIX/Linux, so
I'll take it.
> * tcng
> (some clean-up required)
I have some idea about
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:57:18PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 May 2006 13:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:20:14PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > Even the guy at 7-Eleven has the big book of north american ID cards with
> > > p
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 06:51:54PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> In my ideal world, this is what it would look like:
>
> Starting RAID devices ...
> /dev/md0 has been started with 3 drives.
> /dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives.
> /dev/md2 assembled from 2 drives - need all 3 to start
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 02:36:15AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote:
> > The friend muttered something about Ubuntu being as flaky as
> > Windows, then rebooted and started the installation anew...
>
> This is not an Ubuntu mailing list. It's pretty anno
On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 10:24:45PM +0200, Cesare Leonardi wrote:
> One of the terrible effect of software patents is that nobody knows if
> his program infringe some of them in some country. And, as you said, i
> think it's impossible to be completely patent-free as things stand now.
However, do
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 12:02:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Just as /etc/bashrc is not hidden, whereas ~/.bashrc is, *why*
> > should any *system* files be hidden?
>
> IMO dotfiles are a historical artifact which we are stuck with. If we
> were just
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 12:38:52PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> * Jari Aalto+usenet [Thu, Jun 15 2006, 01:31:49PM]:
> > x-word-processor
> > x-spreadsheet
> > x-file-manager
> > x-archiver
> > x-media-player or "x-video-player"
> > x-media-ed
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 01:56:21PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> for mentors.debian.net I would like to find a perfect (TM) regular
> expression to split the "Version:" line of a control file into:
>
> - epoch
> - upstream version
> - Debian package revision
>
> My current attempt is:
>
>
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:17:27AM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> > If package maintainer wants to build it faster on their own machine, I
> > would imagine that checking for an environment variable (DEB_MAKE_OPTS
> > or something, perhaps?) and using that would be the way to go. By
> > default, b
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 02:06:26AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Let's allow maintainers to use make -jX according to their common
> > sense, requiring obeying an env variable to opt out.
>
> Why not just have some ENV v
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:38:51PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 10:31:54AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On the other hand, making builds significantly faster is not
> > something that you can shake a stick at. Typically make -jX is faster
> >
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 12:38:51PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> I don't think it's good to define an opt-out variable (*_NON_PARALLEL).
> Think positive! So, it would be better to define DEB_MAKE_PARALLEL, but even
> better it would be to use something existing: CONCURRENCY_LEVEL as Don
> Amst
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:22:35PM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > The benefits on UP are small (~10%), but except for huge working
> > sets, non-negative. And the maintainer knows if the package handles
> >
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:42:07PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> SMP buildd systems currently run multiple instances of buildd at
> the same time, rather than expecting a package to specify make -j
> itself. Having three packages that specify 'make -j 4' on a
> multiprocessor buildd host that _al
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 07:50:50PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> ke, 2006-06-28 kello 18:43 +0200, Adam Borowski kirjoitti:
> > What do you think about going with Don Armstrong's suggestion
> > ($CONCURRENCY_LEVEL), while handling the default (no env var) my
> > way
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:26:15AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Still, the buildd admin has no way to estimate how much a sub-process
> > of a package is going to use, the maintainer has at least a rough
> > idea. Si
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:41:33AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 03:22:48AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > The same can't be said for upstream makefiles though. Many sources
> > don't build with -j option.
Right, that's just what I said :p It's the upstream and
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 06:17:20PM -0400, Jason Spiro wrote:
> * Package name: openwatcom
> * License : Sybase Open Watcom Public License 1.0 (it is
> OSI-approved)
Oops... it looks like OSI smoked something especially bad this time,
I'm afraid. This license looks like someone took h
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:10:34AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > the moment you use openwatcom to compile any work-related piece of
> > software (thus not "Personal Use"), you need to make the source of
> > openwa
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:36:12AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "use", like, for example, compile a piece of software. You don't
> > need to distribute openwatcom to anyone to fall within this clause.
>
>
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:57:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Additionally, it puzzles me how you think a maintainer will be able to
> accurately predict how much RAM a certain build is going to use. There
> are so many variables, that I think anything but 'this is the fastest
> way to build i
On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 02:38:30PM +0200, "Uwe A. P. Würdinger" wrote:
> James Westby schrieb:
> >An estimate of the pacakages that generate a certificate in postinst
> >(lets hope there are none that include them in the package) I tried:
> >
> >$ grep-available -FDepends openssl -sPackage -n | sor
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 08:23:00PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 03:04:14PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 11:57:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Additionally, it puzzles me how you think a maintainer will be able t
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 08:57:54AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Kevin Bube wrote:
> > What about switching to dvdrtools? I think this project was
> > started to solve the frequently recurring arguments about the
> > licensing and the device adressing scheme cdrtools use.
>
> dvdrtools are curren
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:28:49PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Updating with pdiffs took one minute nine seconds while downloading a
> completely new set of list files took eight seconds.
>
> Test environment was quite unfair though (an old machine with an 1200
> MHz CPU and a single, slow disk on
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:34:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Err, AIUI, ruby gems are a way to automatically install extras to a
> running ruby environment, much in the same way that the CPAN module is
> used for Perl.
>
> I fail to see why this would be "completely useless" on smaller
> arc
ct multiple builds running on the same host. In
that case, just set B appropiately; to 1 if you want
to disable any parallelism altogether.
=head1 SEE ALSO
L
=head1 AUTHOR
Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=cut
#Leaving no output would lead to bare -j, that is, -j INFINITY.
su
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> For example, the pike blurb could be summarised with something like:
>
> Pike is an interpreted, object-oriented, dynamic programming language
> with a syntax similar to C. To learn more about pike, see the package
> pike7.6 or
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> On Monday 10 July 2006 02:17, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 05:02:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Another problem is with hosts that do not accept a message from an MTA
> > > unless that MTA is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: vtgamma
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http://angband.pl/viewvc/vtgamma/trunk/
* License : Public Domain
Description : gamma correction for Linux console
This to
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:46:51PM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> Joerg clearly stands that:
>
> 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> be called "scripts":
>
> """ GPL §3 requires the "scripts for compilation" to be provided but
> as a first note, it is unclear w
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
> I will upload ~20 source packages in the next few weeks, adding
> support for more architectures to each package. So I'm really looking
> for a general solution and not one that only applies to asis.
Why aren't those packages arch:
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 10:11:41AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 13:14 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I will drop the version from the description and add cpio to the
> > suggests.
> >
> > I added the suggestion to the description because I guess that .tar.gz
> > will be the
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 10:42:22PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said:
> > And finally, if we don't care about standards conformance, I have said
> > that a good second-best is to document exactly what our requirements
> > are, rather than burying the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: chameleon-cursor-theme [1]
Version : 0.5-1
Upstream Author : Giuseppe Benigno
* URL :
http://www.{gnome,kde,xfce[2]}-look.org/content/show.php?content=38459
* L
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 04:41:37PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Ian Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060726 13:18]:
> >> But, for example, foo <-Depends-> foo-data is not usually an example
> >> of a silly dependency.
> >
> > Actually, there is
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:03:13AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
> > * Make it easier for package maintainers
> > - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
>
> How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designin
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Monday 02 June 2003 04:09, Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes wrote:
> > How to start debian direct on console mode,
> Eh? I thought Debian always started in console mode unless you both
> installed
> xdm (or the gnome/kde equivalent) and enabled it.
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:51:07AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > - drop the i386 support
> What we have not yet decided is whether we drop i386 support for C++
> packages or for all packages. If we choose the former, the mini-i386
> will just need to
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Stephen Stafford wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > What about perusing the INT 6 idea, and going all the way up to i686?
> While I support the removal of 386 support, I absolutely and strenuously
> object to going to
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Note that my idea was about patching the kernel that so the newer opcodes
> > would be emulated in software. Everything would still work even on a 386,
> > just sl
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Hmm... I'm not sure about this as the last time I used assembler was
> > in the times of real mode DOS, but there is a yet another option:
> > we can patch the kernel so when an invalid opcode occurs, whatever
> > instruction was at CS:EIP gets emu
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 12:49:10PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Vel?zquez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 10:57:40PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> >Now, if one removes or purges, say, KDE to install an unofficial
> > version... would (s)he loose all hi
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Thomas Smith wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, at 05:53 PM, I wrote:
> > I strongly believe that this is an overreaction. Christian is willing
> > to work with us to bring the package up to date, so there is no reason
> > not to accept this. I suggest that someone (I coul
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:12:35PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Ava Driscoll wrote:
> > > I do not appreciate the following showing up:
> > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01662.html
> >
> > That
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, George Danchev wrote:
> > Why not? It's a package. We modify it as we need to in order to provide
> > functionality and satisfy the needs of our users. I'm perfectly willing
> > to bet that more of our users are interested in a functional ipsec stack
> > than are interested in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: kbtin
Version : 1.0.5
Upstream Author : Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://kbtin.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL
Sponsor : Wanted
Package : http://kbtin.sf.net/
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Erast Benson wrote:
Let me enlighten you in regards of CDDL benefits. The great thing about
CDDL is that it is file based. So, all files which are licensed under
CDDL-terms works exactly as GPL does. i.e. any change made by anybody
(including propriatery distributors) *must* b
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Debian scales fine on non-glibc ports. It doesn't do so well on non-GPL
compatible ports. These are very much not the same thing.
In fact, Debian and GPL software in general work just fine on non-GPL
compatible platforms. I use and distribute (even c
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
I don't think the suggestion was to make TMP=~/tmp, but TMP=/tmp/$USER,
where /tmp/$USER is owned by the user in question and is inaccessible to
others.
It would be a lot better to use TMP=/tmp/users/$USER, as user names are
pretty likely to clash with
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:38:53PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey> Francois Marier wrote:
> >> Now the problem (see bug #462658) is that if you ever put a non-empty
> >> password there, then, you can no longer get rid of it after
>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:48:45AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 18:47:53 +0100, Roland Stigge wrote:
> > Again, I don't agree here (backed by p2): The package is wrong if it
> > asserts that it's "Architecture: all". It contains powerpc specific
> > stuff and can only be buil
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:38:04AM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> As an incredibly late follow-up to this [0] small thread, I created a
> small script to act as backend for pdns and return a mirror for the
> user's country.
> It's a simple DNS based geographic mirror selection
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:09:24PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Uhm, and how exactly do you get the arch? At DNS time you don't have
> > anything but the requester's or his ISP's IP.
>
> This would have to be placed insid
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:34:08AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:54:11 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> >> > Of course, that would mean that the few debian/rules (hi Manoj)
> >> > in Debian not being makefiles [...]
> What do you mean, still? I have never use
dded CNAMEs to a
> > PowerDNS server that manages the zone geomirror.angband.pl (helpfully
> > loaned by Adam Borowski). This server is running pdns-backend-pipe,
> > which simply runs a script to determine the best mirror based on the
> > contents of Mirrors.masterlist[0], the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:33:54AM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:40:14 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > I've already changed my /bin/sh and I've found very very few
> > broken/missbehaving scripts.
> > And as a great pro my boot time is more than 50% faster now, not to mention
> > tha
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:25:06PM +0100, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Humm
>
>
>
> And why not a marmot ??
Screw marmots. What about a human?
I would suggest this one:
http://people.debian.org/~amaya/wallpapers/dsc01074.jpg
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:53:31PM +0100, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote:
> I am running a dual boot system with Windows XP and Debian just
> upgraded to unstable installed.
>
> As usual Windows sets the hardware clock to local time. To compensate
> for this I have UTC=no in /etc/default/rcS as sp
1 - 100 of 1214 matches
Mail list logo
