Hi,
I recently uploaded a package to experimental and was suprised at the build
failures [1]. I have built it locally and on a porter box without issue --
each time using a clean unstable chroot.
[1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?
pkg=insighttoolkit5&arch=amd64&ver=5.4.3-2&stamp=1
Greetings,
This message is an automated, unofficial publication of vote results.
Official results shall follow, sent in by the vote taker, namely
Debian Project Secretary
This email is just a convenience for the impatient.
I remain, gentle folks,
Your humble servant,
De
Hi Steven,
Looks like the distribution is being picked up correctly, but you may be
missing the aspcud criteria used by the buildd's, see the
`--aspcud-criteria` option in [1].
Cheers!
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Enabling_experimental
Michael Stone wrote:
> Debian is a general purpose OS that can form the foundation for a lot
> of variants. But, that flexibility has a cost, and the cost is size &
> complexity. /var/lib/apt and /var/lib/dpkg alone are the size of a
> minimal linux distribution, without even accounting for actual
* Michael Stone [250419 15:47]:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:17:12PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
They likely lack perl, as well. Most/all awk usage in maintainer
scripts could probably be replaced with perl. But, if you are in the
minimizing game, perhaps you'd rather remove perl from the ess
Sean Whitton writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri 18 Apr 2025 at 08:18am -04, Michael Stone wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:52:17PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>>On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 08:02pm -05, Richard Laager wrote:
So, personally, I think getting mktemp(1) added to POSIX would be
bett
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 08:05:54PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
I have interpreted scripts that I want to run on any FreeBSD and Debian
machine, because they are part of my OS bootstrapping. What else is
there than POSIX sh for this? Therefore, it's still relevant.
With that requirement, what y
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:17:12PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
They likely lack perl, as well. Most/all awk usage in maintainer
scripts could probably be replaced with perl. But, if you are in the
minimizing game, perhaps you'd rather remove perl from the essential
set? A substantially harde
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 04:09:53PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Michael Stone [250419 15:47]:
If the goal is a minimal container image, why use debian at all vs a
distribution optimized for that purpose? Running alpine without perl
is already a solved problem...
This is true for a lot
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 10:55:20PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
This just hasn't been my experience. You don't need perfect
compatibility (or certification). By restricting myself to the POSIX
specifications of sh, awk, find, grep and sed, I've profitably written
several non-trivial programs that
On Apr 19, Michael Stone wrote:
If the goal is a minimal container image, why use debian at all vs a
distribution optimized for that purpose? Running alpine without perl
is already a solved problem...
Because I want to use a real libc, for a start.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description:
Hello,
On Fri 18 Apr 2025 at 08:18am -04, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 02:52:17PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 08:02pm -05, Richard Laager wrote:
>>> So, personally, I think getting mktemp(1) added to POSIX would be
>>> better for portability in the long ru
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Bayle
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sphinx-data-viewer
Version : 0.1.5
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/useblocks/sphinx-data-
viewer/graphs/contributors
* URL : https://github.com/useb
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:37:34 +0200
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 7066677e-e899-4143-af5e-710364fc2673
> [ ] Choice 1: Gianfranco Costamagna
> [ ] Choice 2: Julian Andres Klode
> [1] Choice 3: Andreas Ti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Bayle
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: sphinx-needs
Version : 5.1.0
Upstream Contact: https://github.com/useblocks/sphinx-
needs/graphs/contributors
* URL : https://github.com/useblocks/sphinx
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mitchell Augustin
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python3-test2ref
Version : 0.8.2
Upstream Contact: iccode17
* URL : https://github.com/nbiotcloud/test2ref
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:37:34 +0200
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- 7066677e-e899-4143-af5e-710364fc2673
> [ ] Choice 1: Gianfranco Costamagna
> [ ] Choi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:37:34 +0200
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 7066677e-e899-4143-af5e-710364fc2673
> [ ] Choice 1: Gianfranco Costamagna
> [ ] Choice
Hi
On 18-04-2025 15:46, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Should I log one bug for all 19 packages, or one bug per package ?
I'm pretty sure ftp-master has workflows that desire one bug per package
as I've seen that request often enough.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 03:46:03PM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> But I forgot that all raku-modules are Architecture: any, which means that
> all
> these module must also be removed from unstable/arm*.
>
> There are 19 packages to be removed from arm*.
>
> Should I log one bug for all 19 pac
On Saturday, 19 April 2025 18:23:06 Central European Summer Time Mattia
Rizzolo wrote:
> But I recommend you just leverage control commands while filing, since
> ftp-master tools just parse the subject:
Good idea !
Thanks both for the help
Hello,
On Sat 19 Apr 2025 at 09:40am -04, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 08:05:54PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote:
>>I have interpreted scripts that I want to run on any FreeBSD and Debian
>>machine, because they are part of my OS bootstrapping. What else is
>>there than POSIX sh for
22 matches
Mail list logo
