Re: "Missing" entries in timezone tables

2025-04-08 Thread Ananthu C V
Hi, I am not entirely sure, but I think you can probably find those missing timezones in tzdata-legacy package. Best, Ananthu

Should be wtmp considered as successor of who(1)?

2025-04-08 Thread Dirk Lehmann
Hi curl's and boys =D in relation to the discussion of 'utmp in trixie' * https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/04/msg00011.html It looks like, that wtmp is an well alternative to who(1). For that the command $> last -p now should be able to use in the future. But the developers at

Re: Formal warning for conduct on Debian mailing lists

2025-04-08 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
[Forwarded copy of original email: signed for authentication] On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 04:06:17PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > Dear Branden, > > The Debian Code of Conduct[1] (and the mailing list Code of Conduct[2]) can > be boiled down to two sentences in simple English: > Assume good

Re: Should be wtmp considered as successor of who(1)?

2025-04-08 Thread Chris Hofstaedtler
* Dirk Lehmann [250408 17:20]: in relation to the discussion of 'utmp in trixie' * https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/04/msg00011.html It looks like, that wtmp is an well alternative to who(1). For that the command $> last -p now should be able to use in the future. But the devel

Re: "Missing" entries in timezone tables

2025-04-08 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 04:50:58PM -0500, Richard Laager wrote: Option C would also keep the whole system consistent. But in that scenario, installing python-tz indirectly adds system-wide timezone values. I'm hesitant about that idea; it feels like "spooky action at a distance". FWIW, that'

Re: "Missing" entries in timezone tables

2025-04-08 Thread Richard Laager
I got bit (not in pytz) by US/Pacific disappearing, so I understand the annoyance from the user perspective. However, as that is what has happening in tzdata, I don't think we should have individual packages trying to fight that individually/haphazardly. I looked at the patches in the package.

Re: Should be wtmp considered as successor of who(1)?

2025-04-08 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 05:19:38PM +0200, Dirk Lehmann wrote: in relation to the discussion of 'utmp in trixie' * https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/04/msg00011.html It looks like, that wtmp is an well alternative to who(1). For that the command $> last -p now No. utmp and wtmp ar

Bug#1102391: ITP: python-typing-inspection -- Tools to inspect Python type annotations at runtime

2025-04-08 Thread Colin Watson
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Colin Watson X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-typing-inspection Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Contact: Victorien Plot * URL : https://github.com/pydantic/typing-inspection * License : MIT P

Re: "Missing" entries in timezone tables

2025-04-08 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 06:42:43AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: But ./gen_tzinfo.py in python-tz adds extra timezones it believes should be present, including some backwards-compatible entries such as "US/Pacific". Adding these timezones is possible, but I am loath to diverge from tzdata..

Re: "Missing" entries in timezone tables

2025-04-08 Thread Richard Laager
Perhaps I was unclear, which might have made things worse than having not said anything at all. So I'll take one attempt at clarifying. The issue doesn't impact me personally all that much, I don't have strong feelings, and I recognize that all options have pros and cons. As I understood the